An MRI-based assessment of standard and extralevator abdominoperineal excision specimens: Time for a patient tailored approach?

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 822-828

  How, Peter ^a   West, Nicholas P ^b   Brown, G ^a  

^a ROYAL MARSDEN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXTRALEVATOR ABDOMINOPERINEAL EXCISION; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RECTUM RESECTION; STANDARD ABDOMINOPERINEAL EXCISION;

ABDOMEN; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERINEUM; PROGNOSIS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84896712097     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3378-7     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(21):3061-8.
2. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, Marijnen CAM, van Krieken JHJM, Quirke P. Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(36):9257-64.
3. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(2):303-12.
4. Marr R, Birbeck K, et al. The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):74-82.
5. Salerno G, Chandler I, Wotherspoon A, Thomas K, Moran B, Brown G. Sites of surgical wasting in the abdominoperineal specimen. Br J Surg. 2008;95(9):1147-54.
6. Miles E. A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet. 1908;2:1812-1813.
7. West NP, Finan PJ, et al. Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3517-3522.
8. West NP, Anderin C, et al. Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(4):588-99.
9. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307-10.
10. Shihab OC, Taylor F, Salerno G, Heald RJ, Quirke P, Moran BJ, Brown G. MRI predictive factors for long-term outcomes of low rectal tumours. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(12):3278-84. Epub 2011 May 18.
11. Shihab OC, Brown G, Daniels IR, Heald RJ, Quirke P, Moran BJ. Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumours and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(3):251-256.
12. Nagtegaal ID, Cornelius JH, et al. Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(36):9257-64.
13. Mathis KL, Larson DW, et al. Outcomes following surgery without radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99(1):137-43.
14. Messenger DE, Cohen Z, et al. Favorable pathologic and long-term outcomes from the conventional approach to abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:793-802.