Pulsatile perfusion reduces the risk of delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplants, irrespective of donor type and cold ischemic time

Transplantation

Volumn 97, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 668-674

  Gill, Jagbir ^a,b   Dong, James ^a   Eng, Michael ^a   Landsberg, David ^a   Gill, John S ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences   (Canada)

^c TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cold ischemic time; Deceased donor kidney transplantation; Delayed graft function; Donor type; Pulsatile perfusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CADAVER KIDNEY; COLD ISCHEMIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE REGISTRY; DONOR AFTER CIRCULATORY DEATH; EXPANDED CRITERIA DONOR; FEMALE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; HUMAN; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KIDNEY PRESERVATION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; PULSATILE KIDNEY PERFUSION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; STANDARD CRITERIA DONOR; UNITED STATES; CONFOUNDING VARIABLE; CRYOPRESERVATION; DONATION AFTER CIRCULATORY DEATH DONOR; EDITORIAL; EXTENDED CRITERIA DONOR;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COLD ISCHEMIA; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PERFUSION; PROPENSITY SCORE; PULSATILE FLOW; REGISTRIES; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84896657886     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000438637.29214.10     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Gjertson DW. Impact of delayed graft function and acute rejection on graft survival. Transplant Proc 2002; 34: 2432.
2. Ojo AO, Wolfe RA, Held PJ, et al. Delayed graft function: Risk factors and implications for renal allograft survival. Transplantation 1997; 63: 968.
3. Tapiawala SN, Tinckam KJ, Cardella CJ, et al. Delayed graft function and the risk for death with a functioning graft. J AmSocNephrol 2010; 21: 153.
4. St Peter SD, Imber CJ, Friend PJ. Liver and kidney preservation by perfusion. Lancet 2002; 359: 604.
5. Stratta RJ. Is machine perfusion a superior method of preserving donor kidneys? Medscape Transplantation 2009. Available at: Http:// www.medscape.com/viewarticle/587800. Accessed December 4, 2013.
6. MoersC, Smits JM,MaathuisMH, et al.Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl JMed 2009; 360: 7.
7. Moers C, Pirenne J, Paul A, et al., Group MPTS. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 770.
8. Schold JD, Kaplan B, Howard RJ, et al. Are we frozen in time? Analysis of the utilization and efficacy of pulsatile perfusion in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 1681.
9. Barber WH, Deierhoi MH, Phillips MG, et al. Preservation by pulsatile perfusion improves early renal allograft function. Transplant Proc 1988; 20: 865.
10. Burdick JF, Rosendale JD, McBride MA, et al. National impact of pulsatile perfusion on cadaveric kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1997; 64: 1730.
11. Polyak MM, Arrington BO, Stubenbord WT, et al. The influence of pulsatile preservation on renal transplantation in the 1990s. Transplantation 2000; 69: 249.
12. Sellers MT, Gallichio MH, Hudson SL, et al. Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation. Clin Transplant 2000; 14: 543.
13. Halloran P, Aprile M. A randomized prospective trial of cold storage versus pulsatile perfusion for cadaver kidney preservation. Transplantation 1987; 43: 827.
14. Lodhi SA, Lamb KE, Uddin I, et al. Pulsatile pump decreases risk of delayed graft function in kidneys donated after cardiac death. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 2774.
15. (SRTR). OPaTNOaSRoTR. OPTN/SRTR 2011 Annual Data Report. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation; 2012.
16. Bond M, Pitt M, Akoh J, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of methods of storing donated kidneys from deceased donors: A systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 2009; 13: IiiYiv, xiYxiv, 1Y156.
17. Wight J, Chilcott J, Holmes M, et al. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulsatile machine perfusion versus cold storage of kidneys for transplantation retrieved from heart-beating and non-heart-beating donors. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7: 1.