Are we frozen in time? Analysis of the utilization and efficacy of pulsatile perfusion in renal transplantation

American Journal of Transplantation

Volumn 5, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1681-1688

  Schold, Jesse D ^a   Kaplan, Bruce ^a   Howard, Richard J ^a   Reed, Alan I ^a   Foley, David P ^a   Meier Kriesche, Herwig Ulf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Deceased donor kidneys; Delayed graft function; Discard rate; Expanded criteria donors; Kidney transplantation; Pulsatile perfusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KIDNEY PRESERVATION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE PERFUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

CADAVER; COHORT STUDIES; CRYOPRESERVATION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LOGISTIC MODELS; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PERFUSION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PULSATILE FLOW; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRANSPLANTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 21344442881     PISSN: 16006135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00910.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Cho SI. Preservation of Cadaver Kidneys. N Engl J Med 1975; 292: 481.
2. Clark EA, Terasaki PI, Opelz G, Mickey MR. Cadaver-kidney transplant failures at one month. N Engl J Med 1974; 291: 1099-1102.
3. Opelz G, Terasaki PI. Kidney preservation: perfusion versus cold storage-1975. Transplant Proc 1976; 8: 121-125.
4. Barber WH, Deierhoi MH, Phillips MG, Diethelm AG. Preservation by pulsatile perfusion improves early renal allograft function. Transplant Proc 1988; 20: 865-868.
5. Burdick JF, Rosendale JD, McBride MA, Kauffman HM, Bennett LE. National impact of pulsatile perfusion on cadaveric kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1997; 64: 1730-1733.
6. Kosieradzki M, Danielewicz R, Kwiatkowski A et al. Early function of kidneys stored by continuous hypothermic pulsatile perfusion can be predicted using a new "viability index". Transplant Proc 2002; 34: 541-543.
7. Light JA, Kowalski AE, Gage F, Callender CO, Sasaki TM. Immediate function and cost comparison between ice storage and pulsatile preservation in kidney recipients at one hospital. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 2962-2964.
8. Polyak MM, Arrington BO, Stubenbord WT et al. The influence of pulsatile preservation on renal transplantation in the 1990s. Transplantation 2000; 69: 249-258.
9. Sellers MT, Gallichio MH, Hudson SL et al. Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation. Clin Transplant 2000; 14: 543-549.
10. Shidban H, Locke J, Mone T et al. Benefits of using pulsatile perfusion pump for cadaveric kidneys. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 320.
11. Halloran P, Aprile M. A randomized prospective trial of cold-storage versus pulsatile perfusion for cadaver kidney-preservation. Transplantation 1987; 43: 827-832.
12. Mittal VK, Kaplan MP, Rosenberg JC, Allaben RA, Toledopereyra LH. Pulsatile perfusion-better than hypothermic storage with cyclosporine as an immunosuppressant. Dial Transplant 1985; 14: 136.
13. Balupuri S, Buckley P, Mohamed M et al. Assessment of non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) kidneys for viability on machine perfusion. Clin Chem Lab Med 2000; 38: 1103-1106.
14. Matsuno N, Sakurai E, Uchiyama M, Kozaki K, Tamaki I, Kozaki M. Use of in-situ cooling and machine perfusion preservation for nonheartbeating donors. Transplant Proc 1993; 25: 3095-3096.
15. Polyak MMR, Arrington BO, Stubenbord WT, Kapur S, Kinkhabwala M. Prostaglandin E-1 influences pulsatile preservation characteristics and early graft function in expanded criteria donor kidneys. J Surg Res 1999; 85: 17-25.
16. Suarez JF, Riera L, Franco E et al. Preservation of kidneys from marginal donors with pulsatile perfusion machine. Transplant Proc 1999; 31: 2292-2293.
17. Wight J, Chilcott J, Holmes M, Brewer N. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulsatile machine perfusion versus cold storage of kidneys for transplantation retrieved from heart-beating and non-heart-beating donors. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7: 1-94.
18. Guarrera JV, Polyak MM, O'Mar AB et al. Pushing the envelope in renal preservation; improved results with novel perfusate modifications for pulsatile machine perfusion of cadaver kidneys. Transplant Proc 2004; 36: 1257-1260.
19. Guarrera JV, Polyak M, O'Mar AB, Kapur S, Stubenbord WT, Kinkhabwala M. Pulsatile machine perfusion with vasosol solution improves early graft function after cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 2004; 77: 1264-1268.
20. Polyak MM, Arrington BO, Stubenbord WT, Kinkhabwala M. Prostaglandin E1 improves pulsatile preservation characteristics and early graft function in expanded criteria donor kidneys. ASAIO J 1998; 44: M610-M612.
21. Benoit G, Jaber N, Moukarzel M et al. Incidence of vascular complications in kidney-transplantation-Is there any interference with the nature of the perfusion solution. Clin Transplant 1994; 8: 485-487.
22. Gage FA, Vodovotz Y. Normalization of nitric oxide flux improves physiological parameters of porcine kidneys maintained on pulsatile perfusion. Nitric Oxide 2003; 9: 141-147.
23. Gok MA, Pelzers M, Glatz JFC et al. Do tissue damage biomarkers used to assess machine-perfased NHBD kidneys predict long-term renal function post-transplant? Clinica Chimica Acta 2003; 338: 33-43.
24. Gok MA, Pelsers M, Glatz JFC et al. Comparison of perfusate activities of glutathione S-transferase, alanine aminopeptidase and fatty acid binding protein in the assessment of non-heart-beating donor kidneys. Ann Clin Biochem 2003; 40: 252-258.
25. Mister M, Noris M, Szymczuk J et al. Propionyl-L-carnitine prevents renal function deterioration due to ischema/reperfusion. Kidney Int 2002; 61: 1064-1078.
26. Merion RM, Oh HK, Port FK, Toledopereyra LH, Turcotte JG. A prospective controlled trial of cold-storage versus machine-perfusion preservation in cadaveric renal-transplantation. Transplantation 1990; 50: 230-233.
27. Opelz G, Terasaki PI. Advantage of cold-storage over machine perfusion for preservation of cadaver kidneys. Transplantation 1982; 33: 64-68.
28. Zhou YC, Cecka JM. Preservation. Clin Transplant 1992; 383-390.
29. Wight JP, Chilcott JB, Holmes MW, Brewer N. Pulsatile machine perfusion vs. cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: a rapid and systematic review. Clin Transplant 2003; 17: 293-307.
30. Port FK, Bragg-Gresham JL, Metzger RA et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1281-1286.
31. Evans RW, Kitzmann DJ. An economic analysis of kidney transplantation. Surg Clin North Am 1998; 78: 149-174.
32. Jeantet A, Piccoli GB, Malfi B et al. Preparation of candidates for renal transplantation: Cost analysis. Transplant Proc 2004; 36: 455-456.
33. Loubeau PR, Loubeau JM, Jantzen R. The economics of kidney transplantation versus hemodialysis. Prog Transplant 2001; 11: 291-297.
34. Whiting JF, Zavala EY, Alexander JW, First MR. The cost-effectiveness of transplantation with expanded donor kidneys. Transplant Proc 1999; 31: 1320-1321.