National impact of pulsatile perfusion on cadaveric kidney transplantation

Transplantation

Volumn 64, Issue 12, 1997, Pages 1730-1733

  Burdick, James F ^a   Rosendale, John D ^b   McBride, Maureen A ^b   Kauffman, H Myron ^b   Bennett, Leah E ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNITED NETWORK FOR ORGAN SHARING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIALYSIS; GRAFT SURVIVAL; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PERFUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; FEMALE; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PERFUSION; PERIODICITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RENAL DIALYSIS; SEX FACTORS; TISSUE DONORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031449142     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199712270-00018     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Alexander JW, Vaughn WK. The use of "marginal" donors for organ transplantation: the influence of donor age on outcome. Transplantation 1991; 51: 135.
2. Lee CM, Scandling JD, Shen GK, Salvatierra O, Dafoe DC, Alfrey EJ. The kidneys that nobody wanted: support for the utilization of expanded criteria donors. Transplantation 1996; 62: 1832.
3. Belzer FO, Kountz SL. Preservation and transplantation of human cadaver kidneys: a two year experience. Ann Surg 1970; 172: 394.
4. Mendez R, Mendez RG, Koussa N, Cats S, Bogaard TP, Khetan U. Preservation effect on oligo-anuria in the cyclosporine era: a prospective trial with 26 paired cadaveric renal allografts. Transplant Proc 1987; 19: 2047.
5. Kumar MSA, Samhan M, Al Sabawi N, et al. Preservation of cadaveric kidneys longer than 48 hours: comparison between Euro-Collins solution, UW solution, and machine perfusion. Transplant Proc 1991; 23: 2392.
6. Merion RM, Oh HK, Port FK, Toledo-Pereyra LH, Turcotte JG. A prospective controlled trial of cold-storage versus machine-perfusion preservation in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 1990; 50: 230.
7. Tesi RJ, Elkhammas EA, Davies EA, Henry ML, Ferguson RM. Pulsatile kidney perfusion for evaluation of high-risk kidney donors safely expands the donor pool. Clin Transpl 1994; 8: 134.
8. Lin H-M, McBride MA, Davies D, et al. 1997 Center-specific graft and patient survival rates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and Richmond, VA: United Network for Organ Sharing, 1997.
9. Rosenthal JT, Danovitch GM, Wilkinson A, Ettenger RB. The high cost of delayed graft function in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 1991; 51: 1115.
10. Johnson CP, Roza AM, Adams MB. Local procurement with pulsatile perfusion gives excellent results and minimizes initial cost associated with renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 1990; 22: 385.
11. Light JA, Kowalski AE, Gage F, Callender CO, Saski TM. Immediate function and cost comparison between ice storage and pulsatile preservation in kidney recipients at one hospital. Transplant Proc 1995; 5: 2962.
12. Kauffman HM, Rodgers RE, Gross WS, et al. Human kidney preservation and shipping. Transplantation 1973; 15: 465.