Temporal expectancy in the context of a theory of visual attention

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 368, Issue 1628, 2013, Pages

  Vangkilde, Signe ^a   Petersen, Anders ^a   Bundesen, Claus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Perceptual processing speed; Temporal expectation; Theory of visual attention

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENT; HAZARD; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL EVOLUTION; VISUAL ANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION;

ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION;

ADULT; ANTICIPATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84896588309     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0054     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bundesen C. 1990 A theory of visual attention. Psychol. Rev. 97, 523-547. (doi:10.1037/0033- 295X.97.4.523)
2. Bundesen C, Habekost T, Kyllingsbæk S. 2011 A neural theory of visual attention and short-term memory. Neuropsychologia 49, 1446-1457. (doi:10. 1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.006)
3. Bundesen C, Habekost T. 2008 Principles of visual attention: linking mind and brain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Vangkilde S, Coull JT, Bundesen C. 2012 Great expectations: temporal expectation modulates perceptual processing speed. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 38, 1183-1191. (doi:10.1037/ a0026343)
5. Petersen A, Kyllingsbæk S, Bundesen C. 2012 Measuring and modeling attentional dwell time. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19, 1029-1046. (doi:10.3758/ s13423-012-0286-y)
6. Matthias E, Bublak P, Costa A, Müller HJ, Schneider WX, Finke K. 2009 Attentional and sensory effects of lowered levels of intrinsic alertness. Neuropsychology 47, 3255-3264. (doi:10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2009.08.004)
7. Matthias E, Bublak P, Müller HJ, Schneider WX, Krummenacher J, Finke K. 2010 The influence of alertness on spatial and nonspatial components of visual attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 36, 38-56. (doi:10.1037/a0017602)
8. Desimone R, Duncan J. 1995 Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193-222. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195. 001205)
9. Bundesen C. 1987 Visual attention: race models for selection from multielement displays. Psychol. Res. 49, 113-121. (doi:10.1007/ BF00308676)
10. Bundesen C, Shibuya H, Larsen A. 1985 Visual selection from multielement displays: a model for partial report. In Attention and performance, vol. XI (eds MI Posner, OSM Marin), pp. 631-649. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Luck SJ, Vogel EK. 1997 The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390, 279-281. (doi:10.1038/36846)
12. Nordfang M, Dyrholm M, Bundesen C. 2013 Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142, 510-535. (doi:10.1037/a0029631)
13. Wolfe JM. 1994 Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1, 202-238. (doi:10.3758/BF03200774)
14. Bundesen C. 1993 The relationship between independent race models and Luce's choice axiom. J. Math. Psychol. 37, 446-471. (doi:10.1006/jmps. 1993.1026)
15. Luce RD. 1963 Detection and recognition. In Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol. 1 (eds RD Luce, RR Bush, E Galanter), pp. 103-189. New York, NY: Wiley.
16. Townsend JT, Ashby FG. 1982 Experimental test of contemporary mathematical models of visual letter recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 8, 834-864. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.6.834)
17. Townsend JT, Landon DE. 1982 An experimental and theoretical investigation of the constant-ratio rule and other models of visual letter confusion. J. Math. Psychol. 25, 119-162. (doi:10.1016/0022- 2496(82)90009-8)
18. Kyllingsbæk S, Markussen B, Bundesen C. 2012 Testing a Poisson counter model for visual identification of briefly presented, mutually confusable single stimuli in pure accuracy tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 38, 628-642. (doi:10.1037/a0024751)
19. Logan GD. 1996 The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and objectbased attention. Psychol. Rev. 103, 603-649. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.603)
20. Shibuya H, Bundesen C. 1988 Visual selection from multielement displays: measuring and modeling effects of exposure duration. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14, 591-600. (doi:10.1037/0096- 1523.14.4.591)
21. Bundesen C, Habekost T, Kyllingsbæk S. 2005 A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychol. Rev. 112, 291-328. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.291)
22. Nobre AC. 2001 Orienting attention to instants in time. Neuropsychology 39, 1317-1328. (doi:10. 1016/S0028-3932(01)00120-8)
23. Nobre AC. 2010 How can temporal expectations bias perception and action? In Attention and time (eds AC Nobre, JT Coull), pp. 371-392. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24. Woodrow H. 1914 The measurement of attention. Psychol. Mon. 17, 1-158.
25. Los SA. 2010 Foreperiod and sequential effects: theory and data. In Attention and time (eds AC Nobre, JT Coull), pp. 289-302. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Niemi P, Näätänen R. 1981 Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychol. Bull. 89, 133-162. (doi:10. 1037/0033-2909.89.1.133)
27. Coull JT. 2009 Neural substrates of mounting temporal expectation. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000166. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000166)
28. Nobre AC, Correa Á, Coull JT. 2007 The hazards of time. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17, 465-470. (doi:10. 1016/j.conb.2007.07.006)
29. Luce RD. 1986 Response times: their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30. Näätänen R. 1971 Non-aging fore-periods and simple reaction time. Acta Psychol. 35, 316-327. (doi:10.1016/0001-6918(71)90040-0)
31. Thomas EAC. 1967 Reaction-time studies: the anticipation and interaction of responses. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 20, 1-29. (doi:10.1111/j. 2044-8317.1967.tb00375.x)
32. Dyrholm M, Kyllingsbæk S, Espeseth T, Bundesen C. 2011 Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: the case of TVA. J. Math. Psychol. 55, 416-429. (doi:10.1016/j.jmp. 2011.08.005)
33. Kyllingsbæk S. 2006 Modeling visual attention. Behav. Res. Methods 38, 123-133. (doi:10.3758/BF03192757)
34. Finke K, Dodds CM, Bublak P, Regenthal R, Baumann F, Manly T, Müller U. 2010 Effects of modafinil and methylphenidate on visual attention capacity: a TVA-based study. Psychopharmacology 210, 317-329. (doi:10.1007/s00213-010-1823-x)
35. Ghose GM, Bearl DW. 2010 Attention directed by expectations enhances receptive fields in cortical area MT. Vis. Res. 50, 441-451. (doi:10.1016/j. visres.2009.10.003)
36. Ghose GM, Maunsell JHR. 2002 Attentional modulation in visual cortex depends on task timing. Nature 419, 616-620. (doi:10.1038/nature01057)
37. Janssen P, Shadlen MN. 2005 A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 234-242. (doi:10.1038/ nn1386)