Great expectations: Temporal expectation modulates perceptual processing speed

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1183-1191

  Vangkilde, Signe ^a   Coull, Jennifer T ^b   Bundesen, Claus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Hazard function; Temporal attention; Temporal prediction; Temporal preparation; TVA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION; TIME; TIME PERCEPTION;

ADULT; ANTICIPATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874414340     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0026343     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barnes, R., & Jones, M. R. (2000). Expectancy, attention, and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 254-311. doi:10.1006/cogp.2000.0738
2. Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., Hackley, S. A., & Ulrich, R. (2006). The locus of temporal preparation effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 536-542. doi:10.3758/BF03193882
3. Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., Seibold, V. C., & Ulrich, R. (2010). Temporal preparation influences the dynamics of information processing: Evidence for early onset of information accumulation. Vision Research, 50, 1025-1034. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.011
4. Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2008). Temporal preparation improves temporal resolution: Evidence from constant foreperiods. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1504-1514. doi:10.3758/PP.70.8.1504
5. Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbæk, S. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112, 291-328. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.291
6. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.523
7. Correa, á., Lupiáñez, J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (2006). Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1076, 116-128. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.074
8. Correa, á., Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (2005). Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 328-334. doi:10.3758/BF03196380
9. Correa, á., Sanabria, D., Spence, C., Tudela, P., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Selective temporal attention enhances the temporal resolution of visual perception: Evidence from a temporal order judgment task. Brain Re-search, 1070, 202-205. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.094
10. Correa, á., & Nobre, A. C. (2008). Neural modulation by regularity and passage of time. Journal of Neurophysiology, 100, 1649-1655. doi: 10.1152/jn.90656.2008
11. Doherty, J. R., Rao, A. L., Mesulam, M. M., & Nobre, A. C. (2005). Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 8259-8266. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1821-05.2005
12. Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170-177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170
13. Dyrholm, M., Kyllingsbæk, S., Espeseth, T., & Bundesen, C. (in press). Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: The case of TVA. Journal of Mathematical Psychology.
14. Ghose, G. M., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2002). Attentional modulation in visual cortex depends on task timing. Nature, 419, 616-620. doi: 10.1038/nature01057
15. Griffin, I. C., Miniussi, C., & Nobre, A. C. (2002). Multiple mechanisms of selective attention: Differential modulation of stimulus processing by attention to space or time. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2325-2340. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00087-8
16. Hackley, S. A., Langner, R., Rolke, B., Erb, M., Grodd, W., & Ulrich, R. (2009). Separation of phasic arousal and expectancy effects in a speeded reaction time task via fMRI. Psychophysiology, 46, 163-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00722.x
17. Janssen, P., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005). A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 234-242. doi:10.1038/nn1386
18. Jones, M. R., Moynihan, H., MacKenzie, N., & Puente, J. (2002). Temporal Aspects of Stimulus-Driven Attending in Dynamic Arrays. Psychological Science, 13, 313-319. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00458
19. Klein, R., & Kerr, B. (1974). Visual signal detection and the locus of foreperiod effects. Memory & Cognition, 2, 431-435. doi:10.3758/BF03196900
20. Kyllingsbæk, S. (2006). Modeling visual attention. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 123-133. doi:10.3758/BF03192757
21. Lange, K., Krämer, U. M., & Röder, B. (2006). Attending points in time and space. Experimental Brain Research, 173, 130-140. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0372-3
22. Lange, K., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2003). Early processing stages are modulated when auditory stimuli are presented at an attended moment in time: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 40, 806-817. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00081
23. Los, S. A., & Heslenfeld, D. J. (2005). Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation: Electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 52-72. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.52
24. Los, S. A. (2010). Foreperiod and sequential effects: Theory and data. In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (1st ed., pp. 289-302). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26. Martens, S., & Johnson, A. (2005). Timing attention: Cuing target onset interval attenuates the attentional blink. Memory & Cognition, 33, 234-240. doi:10.3758/BF03195312
27. Mattes, S., & Ulrich, R. (1997). Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1089-1097. doi:10.3758/BF03205523
28. Miniussi, C., Wilding, E. L., Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (1999). Orienting attention in time. Brain, 122, 1507-1518. doi:10.1093/brain/122.8.1507
29. Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 597-611. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00061
30. Näätänen, R. (1970). The diminishing time-uncertainty with the lapse of time after the warning signal in reaction-time experiments with varying fore-periods. Acta Psychologica, 34, 399-419. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(70)90035-1
31. Näätänen, R. (1971). Non-aging fore-periods and simple reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 35, 316-327. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(71)90040-0
32. Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133-162. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.133
33. Nobre, A. C. (2001). Orienting attention to instants in time. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1317-1328. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00120-8
34. Nobre, A. C. (2010). How can temporal expectations bias perception and action? In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (1st ed., pp. 371-392). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Oldfield, R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
36. Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391-408. doi:10.1037/h0031333
37. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Riehle, A., Grün, S., Diesmann, M., & Aertsen, A. (1997). Spike synchronization and rate modulation differentially involved in motor cortical function. Science, 278, 1950-1953. doi:10.1126/science.278.5345.1950
39. Rimmele, J., Jolsvai, H., & Sussman, E. (2011). Auditory target detection is affected by implicit temporal and spatial expectations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1136-1147. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21437
40. Rolke, B., & Hofmann, P. (2007). Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 522-526. doi: 10.3758/BF03194101
41. Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2010). On the locus of temporal preparation: Enhancement of premotor processes. In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (1st ed., pp. 227-242). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42. Rolke, B. (2008). Temporal preparation facilitates perceptual identification of letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1305-1313. doi:10.3758/PP.70.7.1305
43. Seifried, T., Ulrich, R., Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., & Osman, A. (2010). Temporal preparation decreases perceptual latency: Evidence from a clock paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2432-2451. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.485354
44. Thomas, E. A. C. (1967). Reaction-time studies: The anticipation and interaction of responses. The British Journal of Mathematical and Sta-tistical Psychology, 20, 1-29. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1967.tb00375.x
45. Trillenberg, P., Verleger, R., Wascher, E., Wauschkuhn, B., & Wessel, K. (2000). CNV and temporal uncertainty with "ageing" and 'non-ageing' S1-S2 intervals. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1216-1226. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00274-1
46. Woodrow, H. (1914). The measurement of attention. Psychological Monographs, 17, 1-158.