High Activity Arthroplasty Score has a Lower Ceiling Effect Than Standard Scores After Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 719-721

  Jenny, Jean Yves ^a   Louis, Pascal ^a   Diesinger, Yann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Ceiling effect; High activity score; Outcome measurement; Quality of life measurement; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH ACTIVITY ARTHROPLASTY SCORE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; POST HOC ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

CEILING EFFECT; HIGH ACTIVITY SCORE; OUTCOME MEASUREMENT; QUALITY-OF-LIFE MEASUREMENT; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRALGIA; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; WALKING;

EID: 84896543093     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.015     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13.
2. Insall J.N., Ranawat C.S., Aglietti P., et al. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976, 58:754.
3. McConnell S., Kolopack P., Davis A.M. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum 2001, 45:453.
4. Wade J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992, 30:473.
5. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Murray D., et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:63.
6. Van Hemert W., Meyers W., Kleijn L., et al. Functional outcome of knee arthroplasty is dependent upon the evaluation method employed. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2009, 19:415.
7. Talbot S., Hooper G., Stokes A., et al. Use of a new High-Activity Arthroplasty Score to assess function of young patients with total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25:268.
8. Terwee C.B., Bot S.D., De Boer M.R., et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:34.
9. Collins N.J., Misra D., Felson D.T., et al. Measures of knee function. Arthritis Care Res 2011, 63(S11):S208.
10. Na S.E., Ha C.W., Lee C.H. A new high-flexion knee scoring system to eliminate the ceiling effect. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470:584.
11. Marx R.G., Jones E.C., Atwan N.C., et al. Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using patient-based measures of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1999.
12. Busija L., Osborne R.H., Nisldotter A., et al. Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008, 6:55.
13. Jenny J.Y., Diesinger Y. The Oxford Knee Score: compared performance before and after knee replacement. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012, 98:409.
14. Collins N.J., Roos E.M. Patient-reported outcomes for total hip and knee arthroplasty: commonly used instruments and attributes of a "good" measure. Clin Geriatr Med 2012, 28:367.
15. Hossain F.S., Patel S., Fernandez M.A., et al. A performance based patient outcome score for active patients following total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013, 21:51.
16. Roos E.M., Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003, 1:17.
17. Lingard E.A., Katz J.N., Wright R.J., et al. Kinemax Outcomes Group. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83:1856.