Comparison of interventions for pain control with tenaculum placement: A randomized clinical trial

Contraception

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 229-233

  Goldthwaite, Lisa M ^a   Baldwin, Maureen K ^b   Page, Jessica ^c   Micks, Elizabeth A ^d   Nichols, Mark D ^b   Edelman, Alison B ^b   Bednarek, Paula H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Analgesia; Cervix; Gel; Injection; Lidocaine

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPARISON; ENDOMETRIUM BIOPSY; FEMALE; GEL; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREMENSTRUAL SYNDROME; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TENACULUM; TENACULUM PLACEMENT; TOPICAL ANESTHESIA; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ANALGESIA; CERVIX; GEL; INJECTION; LIDOCAINE;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; CERVIX UTERI; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; HYSTEROSCOPES; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; LIDOCAINE; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PAIN MEASUREMENT; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 84896542764     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: 18790518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. N. Johnson, and D.R. Bromham Effect of cervical traction with a tenaculum on the uterocervical angle Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98 3 1991 309 312 [Epub 1991/03/01]
2. R.H. Allen, D. Bartz, D.A. Grimes, D. Hubacher, and P. O'Brien Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 2009 CD007373. [Epub 2009/07/10]
3. M.M. Shoja, A. Sharma, N. Mirzayan, C. Groat, K. Watanabe, and M. Loukas et al. Neuroanatomy of the female abdominopelvic region: a review with application to pelvic pain syndromes Clin Anat 26 1 2013 66 76 [Epub 2012/11/24]
4. J.M. Rabin, M. Spitzer, A.T. Dwyer, and I.H. Kaiser Topical anesthesia for gynecologic procedures Obstet Gynecol 73 6 1989 1040 1044 [Epub 1989/06/01] (Pubitemid 19143846)
5. R.D. Robinson, Y. Casablanca, K.E. Pagano, N.A. Arthur, G.W. Bates, and A.M. Propst Intracervical block and pain perception during the performance of a hysterosalpingogram: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 109 1 2007 89 93 [Epub 2007/01/02] (Pubitemid 46035513)
6. A. Davies, R.E. Richardson, H. O'Connor, T.F. Baskett, F. Nagele, and A.L. Magos Lignocaine aerosol spray in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial Fertil Steril 67 6 1997 1019 1023 [Epub 1997/06/01] (Pubitemid 27241892)
7. G. Liberty, M. Gal, T. Halevy-Shalem, R. Michaelson-Cohen, N. Galoyan, and J. Hyman et al. Lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream as analgesia for hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, controlled, double blinded study Hum Reprod 22 5 2007 1335 1339 [Epub 2007/01/20] (Pubitemid 47062803)
8. L.J. DeLoach, M.S. Higgins, A.B. Caplan, and J.L. Stiff The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale Anesth Analg 86 1 1998 102 106 [Epub 1998/01/16] (Pubitemid 28040099)
9. E.J. Gallagher, M. Liebman, and P.E. Bijur Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale Ann Emerg Med 38 6 2001 633 638 [Epub 2001/11/24] (Pubitemid 33131561)
10. M.P. Jensen, C. Chen, and A.M. Brugger Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain J Pain 4 7 2003 407 414 [Epub 2003/11/19] (Pubitemid 37122581)
11. K.H. Todd, K.G. Funk, J.P. Funk, and R. Bonacci Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity Ann Emerg Med 27 4 1996 485 489 [Epub 1996/04/01] (Pubitemid 26103814)
12. A.M. Kelly Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med 5 11 1998 1086 1090 [Epub 1998/12/03]
13. M.C. Rowbotham What is a "clinically meaningful" reduction in pain? Pain 94 2 2001 131 132 [Epub 2001/11/03] (Pubitemid 33016605)
14. P.A. Harris, R. Taylor, R. Thielke, J. Payne, N. Gonzalez, and J.G. Conde Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support J Biomed Inform 42 2 2009 377 381 [Epub 2008/10/22]
15. M.F. Costello, S. Steigrad, and A. Collet A prospective, randomised, single-blinded, controlled trial comparing two topical anaesthetic modalities for the application of a tenaculum to the cervix J Obstet Gynaecol 25 8 2005 781 785 [Epub 2005/12/22] (Pubitemid 43160971)
16. A.M. Kelly The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain Emerg Med J 18 3 2001 205 207 [Epub 2001/05/17]