-
1
-
-
0024353899
-
Hysterosalpingography with balloon catheter versus a cannula: Evaluation of patient pain
-
Varpula M. Hysterosalpingography with balloon catheter versus a cannula: evaluation of patient pain. Radiology 1989;172:745-7.
-
(1989)
Radiology
, vol.172
, pp. 745-747
-
-
Varpula, M.1
-
2
-
-
0025279349
-
Pain relief in hysterosalpingography: A comparison of analgesics
-
Lorino CO, Prough SG, Aksel S, Abuzeid M, Alexander SE, Wiebe RH. Pain relief in hysterosalpingography: a comparison of analgesics. J Reprod Med 1990;35:533-6.
-
(1990)
J Reprod Med
, vol.35
, pp. 533-536
-
-
Lorino, C.O.1
Prough, S.G.2
Aksel, S.3
Abuzeid, M.4
Alexander, S.E.5
Wiebe, R.H.6
-
3
-
-
0021929366
-
Reduction of pain following hysterosalpingogram by prior analgesic administration
-
Owens OM, Schiff I, Kaul AF, Cramer DC, Burt RA. Reduction of pain following hysterosalpingogram by prior analgesic administration. Fertil Steril 1985;43:146-8.
-
(1985)
Fertil Steril
, vol.43
, pp. 146-148
-
-
Owens, O.M.1
Schiff, I.2
Kaul, A.F.3
Cramer, D.C.4
Burt, R.A.5
-
4
-
-
0034525158
-
Paracetamol as a prophylactic analgesic for hysterosalpingography: A double blind randomized controlled trial
-
Elson EM, Ridley NT. Paracetamol as a prophylactic analgesic for hysterosalpingography: a double blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Radiol 2000;55:675-8.
-
(2000)
Clin Radiol
, vol.55
, pp. 675-678
-
-
Elson, E.M.1
Ridley, N.T.2
-
5
-
-
0036843249
-
Trancervical intrauterine topical local anesthetic at hysterosalpingography: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
-
Costello MF, Horrowitz S, Steigrad S, Saif N, Bennett M, Egangaki A. Trancervical intrauterine topical local anesthetic at hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2002;78:1116-22.
-
(2002)
Fertil Steril
, vol.78
, pp. 1116-1122
-
-
Costello, M.F.1
Horrowitz, S.2
Steigrad, S.3
Saif, N.4
Bennett, M.5
Egangaki, A.6
-
6
-
-
3042534066
-
The use of intrauterine lidocaine to minimize pain during hysterosalpingography: A randomized trial
-
Frishman GN, Spencer PK, Weitzen S, Plosker S, Shafi F. The use of intrauterine lidocaine to minimize pain during hysterosalpingography: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:1261-6.
-
(2004)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.103
, pp. 1261-1266
-
-
Frishman, G.N.1
Spencer, P.K.2
Weitzen, S.3
Plosker, S.4
Shafi, F.5
-
7
-
-
0026689931
-
Comparison of the efficacy of different local anesthetics and techniques of local anesthesia in therapeutic abortions
-
Wiebe ER. Comparison of the efficacy of different local anesthetics and techniques of local anesthesia in therapeutic abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:131-4.
-
(1992)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.167
, pp. 131-134
-
-
Wiebe, E.R.1
-
8
-
-
0032428867
-
Paracervical anesthesia for hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
-
Cicinelli E, Didonna T, Schonauer LM, Stragapede S, Falco N, Pansini N. Paracervical anesthesia for hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Reprod Med 1998;43:1014-8.
-
(1998)
J Reprod Med
, vol.43
, pp. 1014-1018
-
-
Cicinelli, E.1
Didonna, T.2
Schonauer, L.M.3
Stragapede, S.4
Falco, N.5
Pansini, N.6
-
9
-
-
0029926966
-
The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores
-
Todd KH, Funk JP. The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:142-6.
-
(1996)
Acad Emerg Med
, vol.3
, pp. 142-146
-
-
Todd, K.H.1
Funk, J.P.2
-
10
-
-
0031769055
-
Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain?
-
Kelly AM. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:1086-90.
-
(1998)
Acad Emerg Med
, vol.5
, pp. 1086-1090
-
-
Kelly, A.M.1
-
11
-
-
0036289114
-
Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED
-
Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, Silver W. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2002;20:287-90.
-
(2002)
Am J Emerg Med
, vol.20
, pp. 287-290
-
-
Gallagher, E.J.1
Bijur, P.E.2
Latimer, C.3
Silver, W.4
-
12
-
-
0029917106
-
Clinical versus statistical significance in the assessment of pain relief
-
Todd KH. Clinical versus statistical significance in the assessment of pain relief. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:439-41.
-
(1996)
Ann Emerg Med
, vol.27
, pp. 439-441
-
-
Todd, K.H.1
-
13
-
-
0030112608
-
Pain measurement tools for clinical practice and research
-
Flaherty SA. Pain measurement tools for clinical practice and research. AANA J 1996;64:133-40.
-
(1996)
AANA J
, vol.64
, pp. 133-140
-
-
Flaherty, S.A.1
-
14
-
-
0035689124
-
The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain
-
Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J 2001;18:205-7.
-
(2001)
Emerg Med J
, vol.18
, pp. 205-207
-
-
Kelly, A.M.1
-
15
-
-
0030861766
-
The visual analogue pain intensity scale: What is moderate pain in millimeters?
-
Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimeters? Pain 1997;72:95-7.
-
(1997)
Pain
, vol.72
, pp. 95-97
-
-
Collins, S.L.1
Moore, R.A.2
McQuay, H.J.3
|