|
Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 781-785
|
A prospective, randomised, single-blinded, controlled trial comparing two topical anaesthetic modalities for the application of a tenaculum to the cervix
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
LIDOCAINE;
ADULT;
AEROSOL;
ANALGESIC ACTIVITY;
APPLICATION SITE PAIN;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DOSE RESPONSE;
DRUG ADMINISTRATION ROUTE;
DRUG EFFICACY;
FEMALE;
FORCEPS;
GEL;
HUMAN;
HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
PAIN;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SCORING SYSTEM;
SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
TENACULUM;
TOPICAL ANESTHESIA;
UTERINE CERVIX;
VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;
ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVAGINAL;
ADULT;
ANESTHETICS, LOCAL;
CERVIX UTERI;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY;
LIDOCAINE;
PAIN;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;
SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS;
VAGINAL CREAMS, FOAMS, AND JELLIES;
|
EID: 31544449977
PISSN: 01443615
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/01443610500328173 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (14)
|