Re-defining recovery: A generalized framework for assessing species recovery

Biological Conservation

Volumn 172, Issue , 2014, Pages 155-162

  Westwood, Alana ^a   Reuchlin Hugenholtz, Emilie ^a   Keith, David M ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Conservation; Endangered species; Policy; Protection; Recovery; Species at risk

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; RECOVERY PLAN; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

EID: 84896534637     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.031     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Andresen R., Caputi P., Oades L. Stages of recovery instrument: development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2006, 40:972-980.
2. Australian Government, 2007. Commonwealth Fisheries Harvest Strategy Policy Guidelines.
3. Bellack A.S. Scientific and consumer models of recovery in schizophrenia: concordance, contrasts, and implications. Schizophr. Bull. 2006, 32:432-442.
4. Boates J.S., Fenton M.B. Flagship Species - Flagship Problems: recovery of species at risk and the conservation of biodiversity. Can. J. Zool. 2011, 89:369-370.
5. Bond M.R. The stages of recovery from severe head injury with special reference to late outcome. Int. Rehabil. Med. 1979, 1:155-159.
6. Bottrill M.C., Joseph L.N., Carwardine J., Bode M., Cook C., Game E.T., Grantham H., Kark S., Linke S., McDonald-Madden E., Pressey R.L., Walker S., Wilson K.A., Possingham H.P. Finite conservation funds mean triage is unavoidable. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:183-184.
7. Carroll R., Augspurger C., Dobson A., Franklin J., Orians G., Reid W., Tracy R., Wilcove D., Wilson J. Strengthening the use of science in achieving the goals of the Endangered Species Act: an assessment by the Ecological Society of America. Ecol. Appl. 1996, 6:1-11.
8. Commonwealth of Australia, 1992. Endangered Species Protection Act.
9. Commonwealth of Australia, 1999. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act - C2005C00338.
10. Coristine L.E., Kerr J.T. Habitat loss, climate change, and emerging conservation challenges in Canada. Can. J. Zool. 2011, 89:435-451.
11. COSEWIC, 2011. COSEWIC's Assessment Process and Criteria.
12. D'Elia J., McCarthy S. Time horizons and extinction risk in endangered species categorization systems. Bioscience 2010, 60:751-758.
13. De Leon G. Integrative recovery: a stage paradigm. Subst. Abus. 1996, 17:51-63.
14. Department of Conservation New Zealand, 2013. Key New Zealand Laws and Regulations [WWW Document].
15. Elphick C.S., Reed J.M., Bonta J.M. Correlates of population recovery goals in endangered cirds. Conserv. Biol. 2001, 15:1285-1291.
16. Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, 1975. Ley de Vida Silvestre, Parques Nacionales, Caza y Pesca. Decreto Ley 12301, publicado en Gaceta Oficial del Estado Pluronacional de Bolivia Edición, 771.
17. Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, 1992. Ley de Medio Ambiente.
18. Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, 2010. Ley de Derechos de la Madre Tierra. Ley 71, Publicado en Gaceta Oficial del Estado Pluronacional de Bolivia Edición 205NEC. LA ASAMBLEA LEGISLATIVA PLURINACIONAL.
19. European Commission, 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora.
20. European Commission, 2002. Council Regulation (EC) No. 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 On the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy. Off. J. Eur. Communities L, 98.
21. European Commission, 2009. Council Directive 2009/147/EC on the Conservation of Wild Birds (codified version of Directive 79/409/EEC).
22. Farrier D., Whelan R., Mooney C. Threatened species listing as a trigger for conservation action. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10:219-229.
23. Foin T.C., Riley S.P.D., Pawley A.L., Ayres D.R., Carlsen T.M., Hodum P.J., Switzer P.V. Improving recovery planning for threatened and endangered species. Bioscience 1998, 48:177-184.
24. Gårdmark A., Enberg K., Ripa J., Laakso J., Kaitala V. The ecology of recovery. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2003, 40:131-144.
25. Goble D.D. The Endangered Species Act: What we talk about when we talk about recovery. Nat. Resour. J. 2009, 49:1-44.
26. Government of New Zealand, 1934. Native Plants Protection Act.
27. Government of New Zealand, 1953. Wildlife Act.
28. Government of New Zealand, 1978. Marine Mammals Protection Act.
29. Government of New Zealand, 1989. Trade in Endangered Species Act.
30. Government of New Zealand, 1996. Fisheries Act.
31. Grafton R.Q., Kompas T., Hilborn R.W. Economics of overexploitation revisited. Science 2007, 318(80):1601.
32. Harrow M., Grossman L.S., Jobe T.H., Herbener E.S. Do patients with schizophrenia ever show periods of recovery? A 15-year multi-follow-up study. Schizophr. Bull. 2005, 31:723-734.
33. Hilborn R., Stokes K. Defining overfished stocks: have we lost the plot?. Fisheries 2010, 35:113.
34. Hutchings J.A., Butchart S.H.M., Collen B., Schwartz M.K., Waples R.S. Red flags: correlates of impaired species recovery. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:542-546.
35. Hutchings J.A. Collapse and recovery of marine fishes. Nature 2000, 406:882-885.
36. Hutchings J.A., Minto C., Ricard D., Baum J.K., Jensen O.P. Trends in the abundance of marine fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2010, 67:1205-1210.
37. IUCN Species Survival Commission, 2000. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 3.1, second ed.
38. Jones H.P., Schmitz O.J. Rapid recovery of damaged ecosystems. PLoS One 2009, 4:e5653.
39. Kier G., Kreft H., Lee T.M., Jetz W., Ibisch P.L., Nowicki C., Mutke J., Barthlott W. A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:9322-9327.
40. Lawler J.J., Campbell S.P., Guerry A.D., Kolozsvary M.B., O'Connor R.J., Seward L.C.N. The scope and treatment of threats in endangered species recovery plans. Ecol. Appl. 2002, 12:663-667.
41. Liberman R.P., Kopelowicz A., Ventura J., Gutkind D. Operational criteria and factors related to recovery from schizophrenia. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 2002, 14:256-272.
42. Lotze H.K., Coll M., Magera A.M., Ward-Paige C., Airoldi L. Recovery of marine animal populations and ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:595-605.
43. Lundquist C.J., Diehl J.M., Harvey E., Botsford L.W. Factors affecting implementation of recovery plans. Ecol. Appl. 2002, 12:713-718.
44. Martín-López B., Montes C., Ramírez L., Benayas J. What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation?. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:1370-1380.
45. Mooers A.O., Doak D.F., Scott Findlay C., Green D.M., Grouios C., Manne L.L., Rashvand A., Rudd M., Whitton J.A. Science, policy, and species at risk in Canada. Bioscience 2010, 60:843-849.
46. Myers R.A., Worm B. Extinction, survival or recovery of large predatory fishes. Biol. Sci. 2005, 360:13-20.
47. Neubauer P., Jensen O.P., Hutchings J.A., Baum J.K. Resilience and recovery of overexploited marine populations. Science 2013, 340(80):347-349.
48. OECD, 2012. Inventory of National and Regional Approaches to Fisheries Rebuilding Programmes: Australia. In: Rebuilding Fisheries: The Way Forward, pp. 1-14.
49. Pauly D. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995, 10:430.
50. Poos M.S., Mandrak N.E., McLaughlin R.L. A practical framework for selecting among single-species, community-, and ecosystem-based recovery plans. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2008, 65:2656-2666.
51. Redford K.H., Amato G., Baillie J., Beldomenico P., Bennett E.L., Clum N., Cook R., Fonseca G., Hedges S., Launay F., Lieberman S., Mace G.M., Murayama A., Putnam A., Robinson J.G., Rosenbaum H., Sanderson E.W., Stuart S.N., Thomas P., Thorbjarnarson J. What does it mean to successfully conserve a (vertebrate) species?. Bioscience 2011, 61:39-48.
52. Reid W.V. Biodiversity hotspots. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998, 13:275-280.
53. Russell W.R., Nathan P.W. Traumatic amnesia. Brain 1946, 69:280-300.
54. Sanderson E.W. How many animals do we want to save? The many ways of setting population target levels for conservation. Bioscience 2006, 56:911-922.
55. Schaefer M.B. Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of the commercial marine fisheries. Bul. Int. -Amer. Trop. Tuna Com. 1954, 1:247-285.
56. Schaffer M.L., Stein B.A. Safeguarding our precious heritage. Precious Hertiage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States 2000, 301-321. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York. B.A. Stein, L.S. Kutner, J.S. Adams (Eds.).
57. Scott J.M., Goble D.D., Wiens J.A., Wilcove D.S., Bean M., Male T. Recovery of imperiled species under the Endangered Species Act: the need for a new approach. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2005, 3:383-389.
58. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2001. Global Outlook I. Montreal, Canada.
59. Slingenberg, A., Braat, L., Windt, H. van der., Rademaekers, K., Eichler, L., Turne, K., 2009. Study on Understanding the Causes of Biodiversity Loss and the Policy Assessment Framework (No. DG.ENV.G.1/FRA/2006/0073). Rotterdam, Netherlands.
60. Steward D.J. A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room. Can. Anaesth. Soc. J. 1975, 22:111-113.
61. Tear T.H., Kareiva P., Angermeier P.L., Comer P., Czech B., Kautz R., Landon L., Mehlman D., Murphy K., Ruckelshaus M., Scott J.M., Wilhere G. How much is enough? The recurrent problem of setting measurable objectives in conservation. Bioscience 2005, 55:835.
62. Tear T.H., Scott J.M., Hayward P.H., Griffith B. Recovery plans and the Endangered Species Act: are criticisms supported by data?. Wildl. Res. 1995, 9:182-195.
63. Torgalsbøen A. What is recovery in scizophrenia?. Recovery From Severe Mental Illnesses: Research Evidence and Implications for Practice 2006, Boston University Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston. L. Davidson, C. Harding, L. Spaniol (Eds.).
64. Townsend, A.J., Lange, P.J. De, Duffy, C.A.J., Miskelly, C.M., Molloy, J., Norton, D.A., 2008. New Zealand Threat Classification System Manual. Wellington, New Zealand.
65. U.S. Department of Commerce, 1998. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act; as Amended Through January 12, 2007.
66. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1992. Report to Congress. Washington, DC.
67. U.S.C., 1973. Endangered Species Act, as Amended through the108th Congress, Inst. Environ. Sci., 940 E. NORTHWEST HWY, MT.
68. Wakeford R.C., Agnew D.J., Mees C.C. Review of institutional arrangements and evaluation of factors associated with successful stock recovery plans. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2009, 17:190-222.
69. Wiens J.A., Day R.H., Murphy S.M., Parker K.R. Changing habitat and habitat use by birds after the Exxon Valdez oil spill, 1989-2001. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14:1806-1825.