Red flags: Correlates of impaired species recovery

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 542-546

  Hutchings, Jeffrey A ^a,b   Butchart, Stuart H M ^c   Collen, Ben ^d   Schwartz, Michael K ^e   Waples, Robin S ^f  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL   (United Kingdom)

^d INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^e ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^f NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION; DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; EXTINCTION RISK; GENERALIST; META-ANALYSIS; SPECIES CONSERVATION; TAXONOMY;

ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EVOLUTION; FORECASTING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES EXTINCTION;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ENDANGERED SPECIES; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; FORECASTING; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84865862879     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.06.005     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Butchart S.H.M., et al. Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: Red List Indices for birds. Public Libr. Sci. Biol. 2004, 2:2294-2304.
2. Butchart S.H.M., et al. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 2010, 328:1164-1168.
3. Stuart S.N., et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 2004, 306:1783-1786.
4. Hoffmann M., et al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world's vertebrates. Science 2010, 330:1496-1501.
5. Hutchings J.A., et al. Trends in the abundance of marine fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2010, 67:1205-1210.
6. Collen B., et al. Monitoring change in vertebrate abundance: the Living Planet Index. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 23:317-327.
7. Mace G.M., et al. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22:1424-1442.
8. Musick J.A. Criteria to define extinction risk in marine fishes. Fisheries 1999, 24:6-12.
9. Zamin T.J., et al. National red listing beyond the 2010 target. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24:1012-1020.
10. Venter O., et al. Threats to endangered species in Canada. BioScience 2006, 56:903-910.
11. Evans M.C., et al. The spatial distribution of threats to species in Australia. BioScience 2011, 61:281-289.
12. Waples R.S. Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp., and the definition of " species" under the Endangered Species Act. Mar. Fish. Rev. 1991, 53:11-22.
13. Lotze H.K., et al. Recovery of marine animal populations and ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:595-605.
14. Redford K.H., et al. What does it mean to successfully conserve a (vertebrate) species?. BioScience 2011, 61:39-48.
15. Environment Canada Amended recovery strategy for the roseate tern (Sterna dougallii) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series 2010, Environment Canada.
16. Hutchings J.A., Reynolds J.D. Marine fish population collapses: consequences for recovery and extinction risk. BioScience 2004, 54:297-309.
17. Baillie J.E.M., et al. Toward monitoring global biodiversity. Conserv. Lett. 2008, 1:18-26.
18. SCBD Global Biodiversity Outlook 3 2010, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
19. Tear T.H., et al. Recovery plans and the Endangered Species Act: are criticisms supported by data?. Conserv. Biol. 1995, 9:182-195.
20. Boersma P.D., et al. How good are endangered species recovery plans?. BioScience 2001, 51:643-649.
21. Worm B., et al. Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 2009, 325:578-585.
22. Hilborn R. The frequency and severity of fish stock declines and increases. Developing and Sustaining World Fisheries Resource 1997, 36-38. CSIRO Publishing. D.A. Hancock (Ed.).
23. Hutchings J.A. Collapse and recovery of marine fishes. Nature 2000, 406:882-885.
24. Martin T.G., et al. Acting fast helps avoid extinction. Conserv. Lett. 2012, 5:274-280.
25. Stokes T.K., et al. The Exploitation of Evolving Resources 1993, Springer-Verlag.
26. Kuparinen A., Merilä J. Detecting and managing fisheries-induced evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:652-659.
27. Fraser D.J. How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids. Evol. Appl. 2008, 1:535-586.
28. Lande R., et al. Stochastic Population Dynamics in Ecology and Conservation 2003, Oxford University Press.
29. Escós J.M., et al. Estimating population trends using population viability analyses for the conservation of Capra pyrenaica. Acta Theriol. 2008, 53:275-286.
30. Venturelli P.A., et al. Evidence for harvest-induced maternal influences on the reproductive rates of fish populations. Proc. Biol. Soc. 2009, 276:919-924.
31. Swain D.P. Life-history evolution and elevated natural mortality in a population of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Evol. Appl. 2011, 4:18-29.
32. Benoît H.P., et al. Evaluating the potential for grey seal predation to explain the elevated natural mortality in three fish species in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2011, 442:149-167.
33. Hutchings J.A., Rangeley R.W. Correlates of recovery for Canadian Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Can. J. Zool. 2011, 89:386-400.
34. Ricard D., et al. Examining the knowledge base and status of commercially exploited marine species with the RAM Legacy Stock Assessment Database. Fish Fish. 2012, 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00435.x.
35. Thrush S.F., et al. Forecasting the limits of resilience: integrating empirical research with theory. Proc. R. Soc. B 2009, 276:3209-3217.
36. Hutchings J.A., et al. Life history correlates of extinction risk and recovery potential. Ecol. Appl. 2012, 22:1061-1067.
37. Schindler D.E., et al. Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species. Nature 2010, 465:609-612.