Minimal intervention needed for change: Definition, use, and value for improving health and health research

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 26-33

  Glasgow, Russell E ^a   Fisher, Lawrence ^b   Strycker, Lisa A ^c   Hessler, Danielle ^b   Toobert, Deborah J ^c   King, Diane K ^d   Jacobs, Tom ^e  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE   (United States)

^e InterVision Media   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative effectiveness; Costs; Intervention; Research methods

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FUNDING; HABIT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH EDUCATOR; HEALTH HAZARD; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICATION COMPLIANCE; MINIMAL INTERVENTION NEEDED FOR CHANGE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SELF CARE;

EID: 84896518673     PISSN: 18696716     EISSN: 16139860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-013-0232-1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, National Health Statistics Group. National health care expenditures data. January 2012.
2. Naylor CD, Naylor KT. Seven provocative principles for health care reform. JAMA. 2012; 307(9): 919-920.
3. Billheimer LT (2013) Congressional Budget Office. Implications of rising health care costs: Presentation to the Heritage Foundation. http://www. cbogov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/HeritagePresentation_Bilheimer. pdf. Accessed 13 April 2013.
4. Woolf SH, Johnson RE, Fryer GE Jr, Rust G, Satcher D. The health impact of resolving racial disparities: an analysis of US mortality data. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(9 Suppl): S26-S28.
5. McGlynn EA. An evidence-based national quality measurement and reporting system. Med Care. 2003; 41(1 Supp): I 8-I 15.
6. Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA. 2012; 307(15): 1583-1584.
7. Gierisch JM, DeFrank JT, Bowling JM, et al. Finding the minimal intervention needed for sustained mammography adherence. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 39(4): 334-344.
8. Hsu HS, Gupta G (2010). An overview of the FDA draft guidance on adaptive design clinical trials. Available at: http://www. fda. gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/NewsEvents/WorkshopsMeetingsConferences/UCM209179. pdf. (MPCC Seminar Series, April 6, 2010). Accessed 17 April 2013.
9. Brown CH, Ten Have TR, Jo B, et al. Adaptive designs for randomized trials in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009; 30: 1-25.
10. Brown JH. Breaking symmetry in protein dimers: designs and functions. Protein Sci. 2006; 15(1): 1-13.
11. Greaves CJ, Sheppard KE, Abraham C, et al. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 119.
12. Fiore MC, Bailey WC, Cohen SJ, et al. (2000) Treating tobacco use and dependence. Clinical Practical Guidelines. Rockville, MD, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
13. Carels RA, Darby L, Cacciapaglia HM, et al. Applying a stepped-care approach to the treatment of obesity. J Psychosom Res. 2005; 59(6): 375-383.
14. Michie S, Prestwich A. Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol. 2010; 29(1): 1-8.
15. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free; 2003.
16. Gaglio B, Glasgow RE. Evaluation approaches for dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson R, Colditz G, Proctor E, eds. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012: 327-356.
17. Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Benkeser RM, Peek CJ. What does it mean to "Employ" the RE-AIM model? Eval Health Prof. 2012; 36(1): 44-46.
18. U. S. Preventive Services Task Force (1998). Clinical Handbook of Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, D. C.
19. NCQA, American Diabetes Association (2012). Diabetes Physician Recognition Program. Available at: http://www. ncqa. org/Programs/Recognition/ChangestoDRPandHSRP. aspx. Accessed 17 April 2013.
20. Glasgow RE, Nutting P, Toobert DJ, et al. Effects of a brief computer-assisted diabetes self-management intervention on dietary, biological, and quality-of-life outcomes. Chronic Illn. 2006; 2(1): 27-38.
21. Glasgow RE, Kurz D, King D, et al. Outcomes of minimal and moderate support versions of an internet-based diabetes self-management support program. J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25(12): 1315-1322.
22. Fisher L, Hessler D, Glasgow RE, Arean PA, Masharani U. Naranjo D et al. REDEEM: A pragmatic trial to reduce diabetes distress. Diabetes Care; 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
23. Patterson RE, Kristal A, Tinker LF, Carter RA, Bolton MP, et al. Measurement characteristics of the Women's Health Initiative Food Frequency Questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol. 1999; 9: 178-187.
24. Paxton A, Strycker LA, Toobert DJ, Ammerman AS, Glasgow RE. Starting the conversation: Performance of a brief dietary assessment and intervention tool for health professionals. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 40(1): 67-71.
25. Thompson FE, Kipnis V, Subar AF, Schatzkin A, Potischman N, et al. Performance of a short instrument to estimate usual dietary intake of percent calories from fat. Euro J Clin Nutr. 1998; 52: S63.
26. Patterson RE, Kristal AR, Biener L, et al. Durability and diffusion of the nutrition intervention in the Working Well Trial. Prev Med. 1998; 27: 668-673.
27. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16(9): 606-613.
28. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA. The relationship between diabetes distress and clinical depression with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(5): 1034-1036.
29. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Darles J, et al. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(3): 626-631.
30. Thompson FE, Midthune D, Williams GC, et al. Evaluation of a short dietary assessment instrument for percentage energy from fat in an intervention study. J Nutr. 2008; 138(1): 193S-199S.
31. Krousel-Wood M, Munter P, Jannu A, Desalvo K, Re RN. Reliability of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. Am J Med Sci. 2005; 330: 182-1336.
32. Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33(7): 1126-1141.
33. Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, Toobert DJ, Eakin EG. A social-ecologic approach to assessing support for disease self-management: the Chronic Illness Resources Survey. J Behav Med. 2000; 23: 559-583.
34. Glasgow RE, Wagner E, Schaefer J, Mahoney L, Reid R, Greene S. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care. 2005; 43(5): 436-444.
35. Williams GC, Freedman ZR, Deci EL. Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21(10): 1644-1651.
36. Rabin BA, Purcell P, Naveed S, et al. Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures. Implement Sci. 2012; 7(1): 119.
37. Kaplan RM. Disease, diagnoses, and dollars: the ever-expanding market for medical care. New York: Copernicus Books; 2009.
38. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011; 38(2): 65-76.