Durability and diffusion of the nutrition intervention in the working well trial

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 5 I, 1998, Pages 668-673

  Patterson, Ruth E ^a   Kristal, Alan R ^a   Biener, Lois ^b   Varnes, Jill ^c   Feng, Ziding ^a   Glanz, Karen ^d   Stables, Gloria ^e   Chamberlain, Robert M ^f   Probart, Claudia ^g  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^e NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^g PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer control; Nutrition; Worksite health promotion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EMPLOYEE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUTRITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 0031664375     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0342     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington: U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1991: [DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 91-50213].
2. Thompson B, Kinne S. Social change theory. Applications to community health. In: Bracht N, editor. Health promotion at the community level. Newbury Park (CA): Sage, 1990:45-65.
3. Green LW. The theory of participation: a qualitative analysis of its express in nation and international health politics. Adv Health Educ Promet 1986;(PtI):211-35.
4. Sorensen G, Thompson B, Glanz K, Feng Z, Kinne S, DiClemente C, Emmons K, Heimendinger J, Probart C, Lichtenstein E. Worksite based cancer prevention: primary results from the Working Well Trial. Am J Public Health 1996;86:939-47.
5. Biener L, Glanz K, McLerran D, Sorensen G, Thompson B, Basen-Enquist K, Kinne S, Heimendinger J, Linnan L, Varnes J. Impact of the Working Well Trial on the worksite health environment. 1997. Submitted for publication.
6. Lefebvre RC. Strategies to maintain and institutionalize successful programs: a marketing framework. In: Bracht N, editor. Health promotion at the community level. Newbury Park (CA): Sage, 1990:209-28.
7. Parcel GS, Perry CL, Taylor WC. Beyond demonstration. Diffusion of health promotion innovations. In: Bracht N, editor. Health promotion at the community level. Newbury Park (CA): Sage, 1990:229-51.
8. Abrams DB, Boutwell WB, Grizzle J, Heimendinger J, Sorensen G, Varnes J, for the Working Well Research Group: Cancer control at the workplace: the Working Well Trial. Prev Med 1994; 23:15-27.
9. Patterson RE, Kristal AR, Glanz K, McLerran, D, Hebert J, Heimendinger J, Linnan L, Probart C, Chamberlain B. Components of the Working Well Trial intervention associated with the adoption of healthful diets. Am J Prev Med 1997;13:271-6.
10. Goodman RM, McLeroy KR, Steckler AB, Hoyle RH. Development of level of institutionalization scales for health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1993;20:161-78.
11. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1978.
12. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, (NC): SAS Institute, Inc., 1996.
13. Kelly JG. T'ain't what you do, it's the way you do it. Am J Community Psychol 1979;7:239-61.
14. Stunkard A, Felix M, Yopp P, Cohen RY. Mobilizing a community to promote health: the Pennsylvania County Health Improvement Program (CHIP). In: Rosen J, Solomon L, editors. Prevention in health psychology. Hanover (NH): Univ. Press of New England, 1985:143-90.
15. The COMMIT Research Group. Community intervention for smoking cessation (COMMIT): summary of design and intervention. J. Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83:1620-8.
16. Bracht N, Finnegan JR, Rissel C, Weisbrod R, Gleason J, Corbett J, Belblen-Mortenson S. Community ownership and program continuation following a health demonstration project. Health Educ Res 1994;9:243-55.
17. Steckler A, Goodman RM. How to institutionalize health promotion programs. Am J Health Promet 1989;3(4)34-43.
18. Jackson C, Fortmann SP, Flora JA, Melton RJ, Snider JP, Littlefield D. The capacity-building approach to intervention maintenance implemented by the Stanford Five-City Project. Health Educ Res 1994;9:385-96.
19. Lichenstein E, Thompson B, Nettekoven L, Corbett K, for the COMMIT Research Group. Durability of tobacco control activities in eleven North American communities: life after the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT). Health Educ Res. In press.
20. Heimendinger J, Feng Z, Emmons K, et al. The Working Well Trial: baseline dietary smoking behaviors of employees and related worksite characteristics. Prev Med 1995;24:180-93.