Erratum: From 'reckless' to 'mindful' in the use of outcome data to inform service-level performance management: Perspectives from child mental health (BMJ Quality and Safety (2014) 23 (272-276) DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002557);From 'reckless' to 'mindful' in the use of outcome data to inform service-level performance management: Perspectives from child mental health

BMJ Quality and Safety

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 272-276

  Wolpert, Miranda ^a   Deighton, Jessica ^a   De Francesco, Davide ^a   Martin, Peter ^a   Fonagy, Peter ^b   Ford, Tamsin ^c  

^a ANNA FREUD CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD HEALTH; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONVERSATION; COURAGE; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; EUROSCORE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; MORBIDITY; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 84896498403     PISSN: 20445415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002557corr1     Document Type: Erratum

References (21)

1. National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England. A promise to learn-a commitment to act. Improving the Safety of Patients in England. London: Department of Health, 2013. https://www.gov. uk/government/uploads/ system/uploads/attachment-data/file/226703/Berwick-Report.pdf
2. BMJ. Surgical Outcome Data. [Podcast] 2013 [6th July 2013]. http://www.bmj.com/podcast/2013/07/05/surgical-outcomedata?utm-source= feedburner-bmj.com+download&utm-medium=feed&utm-campaign= Feed%3A+bmj%2Fpodcasts+ %28The+BMJ+podcast%29
3. Keogh B. Review into the quality of care and treatment provided by 14 hospital trusts in England: Overview report 2013. http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/ bruce-keogh-review/Documents/outcomes/keogh-review-final-report.pdf
4. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:9-13.
5. Lilford R, Mohammed MA, Spiegelhalter D, et al. Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma. Lancet 2004;363:1147-54.
6. Norman SM, Henley W, Ford T. Case complexity and outcomes: what do we know and what do we need to know? In: Essau C. ed Inequalities. London: Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, In press.
7. Wolpert M, Ford T, Trustam E, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS): use of idiographic and standardized measures. J Ment Health 2012;21:165-73.
8. Hall CL, Moldavsky M, Baldwin L, et al. The use of routine outcome measures in two child and adolescent mental health services: a completed audit cycle. BMC Psychiatry 2013;13:270.
9. Verhulst FC, Van Der Ende J. Using rating scales in a clinical context. In: Rutter M, Bishop D, Pine DS, Scott S, Stevenson J, Taylor E, et al. eds. Rutter's Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 5th edn. Malden, Oxford and Carlton: Blackwell, 2008:289-98.
10. Department of Health. Children and Young People's Health Outcomes Strategy. London: Department of Health, 2012. http://www.ncvys.org.uk/UserFiles/ DH-CYP-Health-Outcomes-Strategy-Briefing.pdf
11. Garralda ME, Yates P, Higginson I. Child and adolescent mental health service use. HoNOSCA as an outcome measure. Br J Psychiatry 2000;177:52-8.
12. Ford T, Hutchings J, Bywater T, et al. Strengths and difficulties questionnaire added value scores: evaluating effectiveness in child mental health interventions. Br J Psychiatry 2009;194:552-8.
13. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974;185:1124-31.
14. Gray JAM, Gray JAME-bh. Evidence-based healthcare and public health: how to make decisions about health services and public health. 3rd edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2009.
15. Glisson C, Hemmelgarn A. The effects of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children's service systems. Child Abuse Negl 1998;22:401-21.
16. Weisz JR, Kazdin AE. The present and future of evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. In: Weisz JR, Kazdin AE. eds Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. London: The Guilford Press, 2010:439-51.
17. Bickman L, De Andrade AR, Athay MM, et al. The relationship between change in therapeutic alliance ratings and improvement in youth symptom severity: whose ratings matter the most? Adm Policy Ment Health 2012;39:78-89.
18. Goodman R, Scott S. Comparing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and the child behavior checklist: is small beautiful? J Abnorm Child Psychol 1999;27:17-24.
19. Shaffer D, Gould MS, Brasic J, et al. A children's global assessment scale (CGAS). Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983;40:1228-31.
20. Spiegelhalter DJ. Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance. Stat Med 2005;24:1185-202.
21. CORC. CORC's Position on Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) targets concerning outcome measures. London: CORC, 2013. http://www.corc.uk. net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CORCs-Position-on-CQUIN-targets-03042013.pdf