Analysis of open innovation communities from the perspective of social network analysis

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 435-451

  Martinez Torres M R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

online communities; open innovation communities; social network analysis; zero inflated problems

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; INTERNET; NETWORK ANALYSIS; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; SOCIAL NETWORK;

EID: 84896490834     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2013.851378     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Antikainen, M., M. Mäkipää, and M. Ahonen. 2010. Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 13, no. 1: 100-19. doi: 10.1108/14601061011013258
2. Bailey, B.P., and E. Horvitz. 2010. What's your idea?: A case study of a grassroots innovation pipeline within a large software company. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI'10, in Atlanta, GA, USA, 2065-74.
3. Banerjee, P., R. Friedrich, and L. Morell. 2010. Open innovation at HP labs. Computer 43, no. 11: 88-90. doi: 10.1109/MC.2010.322
4. Basole, R.C. 2009. Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem. Journal of Information Technology 24: 144-59. doi: 10.1057/jit.2008.34
5. Berg-Jensen, M., C. Hienerth, and C. Lettl. 2010. Forecasting the attractiveness of user-generating designs via online-data. Proceeding of the 2010 Acadamy of Management Annual Meeting. Montreal, Canada.
6. Blohm, I., C. Riedl, J.M. Leimeister, and H. Krcmar. 2011. Idea evaluation mechanisms for collective intelligence in open innovation communities: Do traders outperform raters? Proceedings of 32nd international conference on information systems, in Shanghai, China, 1-24.
7. Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West. 2006. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Clausen, T. 2013. External knowledge sourcing from innovation cooperation and the role of absorptive capacity: Empirical evidence from Norway and Sweden. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 25, no. 1: 57-70. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.751009
9. Clauset, A., C.R. Shalizi, and M.E.J. Newman. 2009. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review 51: 661-703. doi: 10.1137/070710111
10. Di Gangi, P.M., and M. Wasko. 2009. Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm. Decision Support Systems 48, no. 1: 303-12. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2009.04.004
11. Elmquist, M., T. Fredberg, and S. Ollila. 2009. Exploring the field of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 12, no. 3: 326-45. doi: 10.1108/14601060910974219
12. Faraj, S., S.L. Jarvenpaa, and A. Majchrzak. 2011. Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Journal of Organization Science 22, no. 5: 1224-39. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0614
13. Galbraith, B., and R. McAdam. 2011. The promise and problem with open innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23, no. 1: 1-6. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.537084
14. Hinde, J., and C. Demetrio. 1998. Overdispersion: Models and estimation. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 27: 151-70. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9473(98)00007-3
15. von Hippel, E. 1986. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science 32, no. 7: 791-805. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791
16. von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Jang, T.Y. 2005. Count data models for trip generation. Journal of Transportation Engineering 131: 444-50. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:6(444)
18. Jeppesen, L.B., and K.R. Lakhani. 2010. Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science 21, no. 5: 1016-33. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0491
19. Knock, N. 2001. Compensatory adaptation to a lean medium: An action research investigation of electronic communication in process involvement groups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 44, no. 4: 267-85. doi: 10.1109/47.968108
20. Lambert, D. 1992. Zero-inflated Poisson regression with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics 34, no. 1: 1-14. doi: 10.2307/1269547
21. Laursen, K., and A.J. Salter. 2006. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27, no. 2: 131-50. doi: 10.1002/smj.507
22. Lee, A.H., K. Wang, J.A. Scott, K.K. Yau, and G.J. McLachlan. 2006. Multi-level zero-inflated Poisson regression modelling of correlated count data with excess zeros. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 15: 47-61. doi: 10.1191/0962280206sm429oa
23. Leimeister, J.M. 2010. Collective intelligence. Business & Information Systems Engineering 52, no. 4: 239-42.
24. Lin, C.-L., and H.-Y. Kao. 2010. Blog popularity mining using social interconnection analysis. IEEE Internet Computing 14, no. 4: 41-9.
25. Mahr, D., and A. Lievens. 2012. Virtual lead user communities: Drivers of knowledge creation for innovation. Research Policy 41, no. 1: 167-77. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.006
26. Martínez-Torres, M.R. 2012. A genetic search of patterns of behaviour in OSS communities. Experts Systems with Applications 39, no. 18: 13182-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.083
27. Martínez-Torres, M.R., C. Díaz, S.L. Toral, and F. Barrero. 2012. A text categorisation tool for open source communities based on semantic analysis. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32, no. 6: 532-44. http://doi:10.1080/0144929X.2010.529942. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.624634
28. Martínez-Torres, M.R., and C. Díaz-Fernandez. Forthcoming. Current issues and research trends on open source software communities. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management.
29. Martínez-Torres, M.R., S.L. Toral, F. Barrero, and F. Cortés. 2010. The role of internet in the development of future software projects. Internet Research 20, no. 1: 72-86. doi: 10.1108/10662241011020842
30. Morrison, P.D., J.H. Roberts, and D.F. Midgley. 2004. The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status. Research Policy 33: 351-62. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.007
31. Pujol, J.M., R. Sangüesa, and J. Delgado. 2002. Extracting reputation in multi agent systems by means of social network topology. Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS '02, in Bologna, Italy, 467-74.
32. Rencher, A.C. 2002. Methods of multivariate analysis. 2nd ed. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
33. Sowe, S., I. Stamelos, and L. Angelis. 2006. Identifying knowledge brokers that yield software engineering knowledge in OSS projects. Information and Software Technology 48, no. 11: 1025-33. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2005.12.019
34. Toral, S.L., M.R. Martínez-Torres, and F. Barrero. 2009. Virtual communities as a resource for the development of OSS projects: The case of Linux ports to embedded processors. Behaviour and Information Technology 28, no. 5: 405-19. doi: 10.1080/01449290903121394
35. Toral, S.L., M.R. Martínez-Torres, and F. Barrero. 2010. Analysis of virtual communities supporting OSS projects using social network analysis. Information and Software Technology 52, no. 3: 296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.10.007
36. Toral, S.L., M.R. Martínez Torres, and P. Di Gangi. 2011. User innovations through online communities from the perspective of social network analysis. Proc. 1st international conference on advanced collaborative networks, systems and applications (COLLA 2011), Luxemburgo, 40-5.
37. Urban, G.L., and E. von Hippel. 1988. Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science 34, no. 5: 569-82. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.34.5.569
38. Wellman, B. 1983. Network analysis: Some basic principles. Sociological Theory 1: 155-200. doi: 10.2307/202050
39. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.