The promise and problem with open innovation

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-6

  Galbraith, Brendan ^a   Mcadam, Rodney ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751616844     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2011.537084     Document Type: Editorial

References (31)

1. Bessant, J., and H. Rush. 1995. Building bridges for innovation: The role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy 24: 97-114.
2. Bryant, T., and R. Reenstra-Bryant. 1998. Technology brokers in the North American software industry: Getting the most out of mismatched dyads. International Journal of Technology Management 16: 281-90.
3. Burt, R.S. 1995. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Carlsson, B., and R. Stankiewicz. 1991. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1: 93-118.
5. Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
6. Chesbrough, H. 2006. Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Continua Health Alliance. 2008. http://www.continuaalliance.org (accessed 19 August 2008). Portland, Oregon.
8. Debackere, K., and R. Veugelers. 2005. The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy 34, no. 3: 321-42.
9. Enkel, E., O. Gassman, and H. Chesbrough. 2009. Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management 39, no. 4: 311-430.
10. Etzkowitz, J., A. Webster, C. Gebhart, and B. R. C. Terra. 2000. The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29, no. 2: 313-30.
11. Freeman, L.C. 1978. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1: 205-39.
12. Gassman, O. 2006. Opening up the innnovation process: Towards an agenda. R&D Management 36, no. 3: 223-6.
13. Gassmann, O., E. Enkel, and H. Chesbrough. 2010. Editorial: The future of open innovation. R&D Management 40, no. 3: 231-21.
14. Hackett, S.M., and D.M. Dilts. 2004.A systematic review of business incubation research. Journal of Technology Transfer 29: 55-82.
15. Hargadon, A., and R. Sutton. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 716-49.
16. Hargadon, A.B. 2002. Brokerage knowledge; linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior 24: 41-85.
17. Howells, J. 2006. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy 35, no. 5: 715-28. InnoCentive. 2008. www.innocentive.com (accessed 19 August 2008).Waltham, MA, USA.
18. Lafley, A.G., and R. Charan. 2008. The game-changer: How you can drive revenue and profit growth with innovation. NewYork: Crown Business.
19. Lichtenthaler, U., and H. Ernst. 2008. Intermediary services in the markets for technology: Organizational antecedents and performance consequences. Organizational Studies 29: 1003-38.
20. McAdam, M., B. Galbraith, R. McAdam, and P. Humphreys. 2006. Business processes and networks in university incubators: A review and research agendas. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18: 451-72.
21. McEvily, B., and A. Zaheer. 1999. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 20: 371-89.
22. Morgan, E., and N. Crawford. 1996. Technology brokering activities in Europe - a survey. International Journal of Technology Management 12, no. 3: 360-7.
23. Powell, W.W., K.W. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganisational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116-45.
24. Rogers, E.M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovation. NewYork: Free Press.
25. Stankiewicz, R. 1995. The role of the science and technology infrastructure in the development and diffusion of industrial automation in Sweden. In Technological systems and economic performance: The case of factory automation, ed. B. Carlsson, 165-210. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26. Stewart, J. 2007. Local experts in the domestication of ICTs. Information Communication and Society 10, no. 4: 547-69.
27. Trott, P., and D. Hartmann. 2009. Why 'open innovation' is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management 13, no. 4: 715-36.
28. Von Hippel, E. 1986. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science 32, no. 7: 791-805.
29. Von Zedtwitz, M. 2003. Classification and management of incubators: Aligning strategic objectives and competitive scope for new business facilitation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Managment 3, nos. 1-2: 176-96.
30. Winch, G., and R. Courtney. 2007. The organisation of innovation brokers: An international review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19, no. 6: 747-63.
31. Your Encore. 2008. yourencore.com (accessed 19 August 2008). Indianapolis, USA.