Erratum: Differential effects of the computer-tailored FATaintPHAT programme on dietary behaviours according to sociodemographic, cognitive and home environmental factors (Public Health Nutrition (2014) 17 (431-439) DOI: 10.1017/S1368980012005344);Differential effects of the computer-tailored FATaintPHAT programme on dietary behaviours according to sociodemographic, cognitive and home environmental factors

Public Health Nutrition

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 431-439

  Ezendam, Nicole P M ^a,b   Burg, Johannes ^c   Borsboom, Gerard ^a   Van Empelen, Pepijn ^d   Oenema, Anke ^e  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Eindhoven Cancer Registry   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d TNO   (Netherlands)

^e MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Computer tailoring; Diet; Intervention; Moderation

Indexed keywords

SWEETENING AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BEVERAGE; BODY WEIGHT; CHILD; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COGNITION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; ENVIRONMENT; FAST FOOD; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FRUIT; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL; SOCIOECONOMICS; VEGETABLE; WEIGHT GAIN;

ADOLESCENT; BEVERAGES; BODY WEIGHT; CHILD; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COGNITION; DIET; ENVIRONMENT; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FRUIT; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS; SNACKS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SWEETENING AGENTS; VEGETABLES; WEIGHT GAIN;

EID: 84896482756     PISSN: 13689800     EISSN: 14752727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980015001159     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. Kremers SP, de Bruijn GJ, Droomers M et al. (2007) Moderators of environmental intervention effects on diet and activity in youth. Am J Prev Med 32, 163-172
2. Kraemer HC, Wilson GT, Fairburn CG et al. (2002) Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59, 877-883
3. Baranowski T, Cullen KW, Nicklas T et al. (2003) Are current health behavioral change models helpful in guiding prevention of weight gain efforts? Obes Res 11, Suppl., 23S-43S.
4. Rothman KJ & Greenland S (1998) Modern Epidemiology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers
5. Ezendam NP, Oenema A, van de Looij-Jansen PM et al. (2007) Design and evaluation protocol of 'FATaintPHAT', a computer-tailored intervention to prevent excessive weight gain in adolescents. BMC Public Health 7, 324
6. Ezendam NP, Brug J & Oenema A (2012) Evaluation of the web-based computer-tailored FATaintPHAT intervention to promote energy balance among adolescents: Results from a school cluster randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 166, 248-255
7. Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K et al. (2008) Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res 23, 454-466
8. Brug J & van Assema P (2000) Differences in use and impact of computer-tailored dietary fat-feedback according to stage of change and education. Appetite 34, 285-293
9. . van Stralen MM, de Vries H, Bolman C et al. (2010) Exploring the efficacy and moderators of two computertailored physical activity interventions for older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med 39, 139-150
10. Gans KM, Risica PM, Strolla LO et al. (2009) Effectiveness of different methods for delivering tailored nutrition education to low income, ethnically diverse adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 6, 24
11. Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ & Sutton SR (1998) Stage theories of health behavior: Conceptual and methodological issues. Health Psychol 17, 290-299
12. Gollwitzer PM & Sheeran P (2006) Implementation intentions and goal achievement. A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 38, 69-119
13. Kremers SP, de Bruijn GJ, Visscher TL et al. (2006) Environmental influences on energy balance-related behaviors: A dual-process view. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 15, 9
14. Kremers SP, van der Horst K & Brug J (2007) Adolescent screen-viewing behaviour is associated with consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: The role of habit strength and perceived parental norms. Appetite 48, 345-350
15. Van der Horst K, Oenema A, Ferreira I et al. (2006) A systematic review of environmental correlates of obesityrelated dietary behaviors in youth. Health Educ Res 22, 203-226
16. Ritchie LD, Welk G, Styne D et al. (2005) Family environment and pediatric overweight: What is a parent to do? J Am Diet Assoc 105, 5 Suppl. 1, S70-S79
17. van de Looij-Jansen PM & de Wilde EJ (2008) Comparison of web-based versus paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire: Effects on health indicators in Dutch adolescents. Health Serv Res 43, 1708-1721
18. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50, 179-211
19. Gollwitzer PM (1999) Implementation intentions - Strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol 54, 493-503
20. Van Assema P, Brug J, Ronda G et al. (2001) The relative validity of a short Dutch questionnaire as a means to categorize adults and adolescents to total and saturated fat intake. J Hum Nutr Diet 14, 377-390
21. Van Assema P, Brug J, Ronda G et al. (2002) A short Dutch questionnaire to measure fruit and vegetable intake: Relative validity among adults and adolescents. Nutr Health 16, 85-106
22. Bogers RP, Van Assema P, Kester AD et al. (2004) Reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness to change of a short questionnaire for measuring fruit and vegetable intake. Am J Epidemiol 159, 900-909
23. Collins CE, Watson J & Burrows T (2010) Measuring dietary intake in children and adolescents in the context of overweight and obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 34, 1103-1115
24. Haraldsdottir J, Thorsdottir I, de Almeida MD et al. (2005) Validity and reproducibility of a precoded questionnaire to assess fruit and vegetable intake in European 11- to 12-year-old schoolchildren. Ann Nutr Metab 49, 221-227
25. Statistics Netherlands (not dated) Definitions - Origin. http:// www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/methoden/begrippen/default.htm? ConceptID5315 (accessed September 2008
26. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM et al. (2000) Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. BMJ 320, 1240-1243
27. Hayes AF & Matthes J (2009) Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behav Res Methods 41, 924-936
28. Twisk JW (2006) Applied Multilevel Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
29. Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Dzewaltowski DA et al. (2002) Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity: The role of determinants, correlates, causal variables, mediators, moderators, and confounders. Am J Prev Med 23, 2 Suppl., 5-14
30. Brug J (2008) Determinants of healthy eating: Motivation, abilities and environmental opportunities. Fam Pract 25, Suppl. 1, i50-i55
31. Ezendam NP, Evans AE, Stigler MH et al. (2010) Cognitive and home environmental predictors of change in sugarsweetened beverage consumption among adolescents. Br J Nutr 103, 768-774
32. Wind M, te Velde SJ, Brug J et al. (2010) Direct and indirect association between environmental factors and fruit intake, mediation by psychosocial factors: The Pro Children Study. Public Health Nutr 13, 1736-1745
33. Vereecken C, Haerens L, De Bourdeaudhuij I et al. (2010) The relationship between children's home food environment and dietary patterns in childhood and adolescence. Public Health Nutr 13, 1729-1735