Learning to measure the value of life? Animal experimentation, pedagogy, and (eco)feminist critique

Global Harms: Ecological Crime and Speciesism

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 131-150

  Pedersen, Helena ^a  

^a Swedish Research Council   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896413136     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Adams, C. J. (1993). The Feminist Traffic in Animals. In G. Gaard. (Ed.), Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature. (pp. 195-218). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
2. Andrzejewski, J., Pedersen, H., and Wicklund, F. (forthcoming). Interspecies Education for Humans, Animals, and the Earth. In J. Andrzejewski, M. Baltodano, and L. Symcox. (Eds.), Social Justice, Peace, Eco-Justice and Interspecies Education Standards: A Transformative Framework for Educators. Routledge.
3. Arluke, A. (1994). "We Build a Better Beagle": Fantastic Creatures in Lab Animal Ads. Qualitative Sociology, 17(2), 143-158.
4. Arluke, A., and Hafferty, F. (1996). From Apprehension to Fascination with "Dog Lab": The Use of Absolutions by Medical Students. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 25(2), 201-225.
5. Arluke, A., and Sanders, C. R. (1996). Regarding Animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
6. Armstrong, P. and Simmons, L. (2007). Bestiary: An Introduction. In L. Simmons and P. Armstrong. (Eds.), Knowing Animals. (pp. 1-24). Leiden and Boston: Brill.
7. AstraZeneca. (2000). A series of information leaflets on pharmaceutical research and animal experiments. Södertälje: AstraZeneca AB.
8. Balcombe, J. (2000). The Use of Animals in Higher Education: Problems, Alternatives, and Recommendations. Washington, DC: Humane Society Press.
9. Balcombe, J. (2003). Assessment of alternatives in education. In N. Jukes, and M. Chiuia. (Eds.), From guinea pig to computer mouse. (2nd ed., pp. 40-53). Leicester: InterNICHE.
10. Beirne, P., and South, N. (2007). Introduction: approaching green criminology. In P. Beirne, and N. South. (Eds.), Issues in Green Criminology: Confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals. (pp. xiii-xxii). Cullompton and Portland: Willan Publishing.
11. Birke, L. (1994). Feminism, Animals and Science: The Naming of the Shrew. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
12. Birke, L. (1995). On Keeping a Respectful Distance. In L. Birke, and R. Hubbard. (Eds.), Reinventing Biology: Respect for Life and the Creation of Knowledge. (pp. 75-88). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
13. Birke, L., Bryld, M., and Lykke, N. (2004). Animal performances: An exploration of intersections between feminist science and studies of human/animal relationships. Feminist Theory, 5(2), 167-183.
14. Capaldo, T. (2004). The Psychological Effects on Students of Using Animals in Ways that They See as Ethically, Morally or Religiously Wrong. ATLA, 32,. (Supplement 1B), 525-531.
15. Forsman, B. (1992). Djurförsök: Forskningsetik, politik, epistemologi - en vetenskapsteoretisk kontextualisering. [Animal experimentation: Research ethics, politics, epistemology - a contextualisation; in Swedish]. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.
16. Giroux, H. A. (1997a). Crossing the Boundaries of Educational Discourse: Modernism, Postmodernism, and Feminism. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, and A. S. Wells. (Eds.), Education: Culture, Economy, and Society. (pp. 113-130). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Giroux, H. A. (1997b). Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope: Theory, Culture, and Schooling. A Critical Reader. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
18. Gruen, L. (1993). Dismantling Oppression: An Analysis of the Connection Between Women and Animals. In G. Gaard. (Ed.), Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature. (pp. 60-90). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
19. Gålmark, L. (2005). Skönheter och odjur: En feministisk kritik av djur - människa-relationen. [Beauties and beasts: A feminist critique of the animal-human relation; in Swedish]. Göteborg and Stockholm: Makadam förlag.
20. Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Asssociation Books Ltd.
21. Horkheimer, M., and Adorno, T. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.
22. Hubbard, R. (1995). The Logos of Life. In L. Birke, and R. Hubbard. (Eds.), Reinventing Biology: Respect for Life and the Creation of Knowledge. (pp. 89-102). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
23. Jordbruksdepartementet. (2003). Djuretik. [Animal Ethics; in Swedish]. Stockholm: Jordbruksdepartementet.
24. Kahn, R. (2003). Towards Ecopedagogy: Weaving a Broad-based Pedagogy of Liberation for Animals, Nature, and the Oppressed People of the Earth. Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal 1. http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/JCAS/Journal_Articles_download/Issue_1/kahn.pdf
25. Kheel, M. (1993). From Heroic to Holistic Ethics: The Ecofeminist Challenge. In G. Gaard. (Ed.), Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature. (pp. 243-271). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
26. LaFollette, H., and Shanks, N. (1998). Evolution and Animal Experimentation. In M. Bekoff, and C.A. Meaney. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare. (pp. 213-215). Westport: Greenwood Press.
27. Lynch, M. E. (1988). Sacrifice and the Transformation of the Animal Body into a Scientific Object: Laboratory Culture and Ritual Practice in the Neurosciences. Social Studies of Science, 18, 265-289.
28. McKay, R. (2005). "Identifying with the Animals": Language, Subjectivity, and the Animal Politics of Margaret Atwood's Surfacing. In M.S. Pollock, and C. Rainwater. (Eds.), Figuring Animals: Essays on Animal Images in Art, Literature, Philosophy and Popular Culture. (pp. 207-227). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Nibert, D. (2002). Animal Rights/Human Rights: Entanglements of oppression and liberation. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
30. Nibert, D. (2003). Humans and Other Animals: Sociology's Moral and Intellectual Challenge. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(3), 5-25.
31. Orlans, F.B. (2000). An ethical rationale for why students should not be permitted to harm or kill animals. In M. Balls, A.-M. Van Zeller, and M.E. Halder. (Eds.), Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation. (pp. 1323-1331). Amsterdam and Oxford: Elsevier Science B.V.
32. Pedersen, H. (2002). Humane Education: Animals and Alternatives in Laboratory Classes. Aspects, Attitudes and Implications. Stockholm: Stiftelsen Forskning utan djurförsök.
33. Pedersen, H. (2007). The School and the Animal Other: An ethnography of human-animal relations in education. Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 254. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
34. Persson, U. (2003). Filosofi: frågor och argument. [Philosophy: questions and arguments; in Swedish]. Stockholm: Bonnier Utbildning AB.
35. Phillips, M. T. (1994). Proper Names and the Social Construction of Biography: The Negative Case of Laboratory Animals. Qualitative Sociology, 17(2), 119-142.
36. Regan, T. (2007). Vivisection: the case for abolition. In P. Beirne, and N. South. (Eds.), Issues in Green Criminology: Confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals. (pp. 114-139). Cullompton and Portland: Willan Publishing.
37. Selby, D. (1995). Earthkind: A Teachers' Handbook on Humane Education. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books Limited.
38. Selby, D. (2000). Humane Education: Widening the circle of compassion and justice. In D. Selby, and T. Goldstein. (Eds.), Weaving Connections: Educating for Peace, Social and Environmental Justice. (pp. 268-296). Toronto: Sumach Press.
39. Shapiro, K.J. (2002). A Rodent for Your Thoughts: The Social Construction of Animal Models. In M. Henninger-Voss. (Ed.), Animals in Human Histories: The Mirror of Nature and Culture. (pp. 439-469). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
40. Shiva, V. (1995). Democratizing Biology: Reinventing Biology from a Feminist, Ecological, and Third World Perspective. In L. Birke, and R. Hubbard. (Eds.), Reinventing Biology: Respect for Life and the Creation of Knowledge. (pp. 50-71). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
41. Smith, A. C., III, and Kleinman, S. (1989). Managing Emotions in Medical School: Students' Contacts with the Living and the Dead. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(1), 56-69.
42. Solot, D., and Arluke, A. (1997). Learning the Scientist's Role: Animal Dissection in Middle School. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 26(1), 28-54.
43. Spiegel, M. (1996). The Dreaded Comparison: Human and Animal Slavery. New York: Mirror Books.
44. Szybek, P. (1999). Staging Science: Some aspects of the production and distribution of science knowledge. Lund: Lund University.
45. van den Wijngaard, M. (1995). The Liberation of the Female Rodent. In L. Birke, and R. Hubbard. (Eds.), Reinventing Biology: Respect for Life and the Creation of Knowledge. (pp. 137-148). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
46. Wolfe, C. (2003a). Introduction. In C. Wolfe, Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. (pp. 1-17). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
47. Wolfe, C. (2003b). Subject to Sacrifice: Ideology, Psychoanalysis, and the Discourse of Species in Jonathan Demme's The Silence of the Lambs. (with Jonathan Elmer). In C. Wolfe, Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. (pp. 97-121). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.