The psychological effects on students of using animals in ways that they see as ethically, morally or religiously wrong

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 32, Issue SUPPL. 1B, 2004, Pages 525-531

  Capaldo, Theodora ^a  

^a New England Anti Vivisection Society   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal use; Biological education; Dissection in biology teaching; Ethics and animal use; Medical education; Veterinary education

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL USE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; GENDER; MORALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOTRAUMA; STUDENT; TEACHING;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 3042523473     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119290403201s85     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Plous, S. (1996). Attitudes toward the use of animals in psychological research and education: Results from a national survey of psychology majors. Psychological Science 7, 352-358.
2. Pifer, L., Shimizu, K. & Pifer, R. (1994). Public attitudes toward animal research: Some international comparisons. Web site http://www.psyeta.org/ sa/sa2.2/ pifer.html.
3. Akpan, J.P. (2000). Issues associated with inserting computer simulations into biology instruction: A review of the literature. Web site http://unr.edu/ homepage/crowther/ejse/akpan.html.
4. Cunningham, P. (2000). Animals in psychology education and student choice. Society and Animals 8, 191-212.
5. Hebb, D.O. (1972). Textbook of Psychiatry, 3rd edition. Philadelphia, PA, USA: W.B. Saunders.
6. Tyhurst, J.S. (1951). Individual reactions to community disaster. American Journal of Psychiatry 10, 746-769.
7. Kelly, J.A. (1985). Alternatives to aversive procedures with animals in the psychological teaching setting. Quoted in Cunningham (4).
8. Thomas, M.H., Horton, R.W., Lippencourt, E.C. & Drabman, R.S. (1977). Desensitization to real-life aggression as a function of exposure to television violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 350, 450. Quoted in Cunningham (4).
9. Paul, E.S. & Podberscek, A.L. (2000). Veterinary education and students' attitudes towards animal welfare. Veterinary Record 146, 269-272.
10. Stull, L. (2001). Educational memorial programs - A new perspective on the human-animal bond. Web site http://www.hsus2.org/emp/emp_report.pdf.
11. APA (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, IV., pp. 219, 424. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychiatric Press.
12. Adams, C. & Donavan, J. (1995). Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13. Ascione, F.R. (1993). Children who are cruel to animals: A review of research and implications for developmental psychopathology. Anthrozoos 1, 226-247; (1996). Domestic violence and cruelty to animals. Latham Letter 17, 1-16.
14. Ascione, F.R. (1993). Children who are cruel to animals: A review of research and implications for developmental psychopathology. Anthrozoos 1, 226-247; (1996). Domestic violence and cruelty to animals. Latham Letter 17, 1-16.
15. Arluke, A. & Hafferty, F. (1996). From apprehension to fascination with "dog lab": The use of absolutions by medical students. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 25, 201-225.
16. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. Quoted in Arluke & Hafferty (14).
17. Smith, A.C. III. & Kleinman, S. (1989). Managing emotions in medical school: Students' contacts with the living and the dead. Social Psychology Quarterly 52, 56-69.
18. Orlans, F.B. (1988). Debating dissection. The Science Teacher, 55, 36-40. Quoted in Akpan (3). Issues associated with inserting computer simulations into biology instruction: A review of the literature. Web site http://unr.edu/ homepage/crowther/ ejse/akpan.html.
19. ESEC (2000). ESEC Factsheet. Boston, MA, USA: Ethical Science and Education Coalition.
20. College Board Web site. (2001). Advanced placement biology teachers' corner. http://www.collegeboard.org/ ap/biology/tc/dissect.html.
21. Herzog, H.A. Jr, Vore, T.L. & New, J.C. Jr (2001). Conversations with veterinary students: Attitudes, ethics, and animals. Anthrozoos 3, 181-188.
22. Haas, J. & Shaffir, W. (1977). The professionalization of medical students: Developing competence and a cloak of competence. Symbolic Interaction 1, 71-88. Quoted in Smith & Kleinman (16).
23. ESEC (2002). ESEC Questionnaire. Boston, MA, USA: Ethical Science and Education Coalition.
24. NEAVS (2000). Viewpoints Series, #3. Boston, MA, USA: New England Anti-Vivisection Society.
25. NEAVS (1999-2001). NEAVS Investigations, Internal Documents, and Veterinary Student Evaluations. Boston, MA, USA: New England Anti-Vivisection Society.
26. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority. An Experimental View. New York, USA: Harper. Quoted on http://www.cultsock.ndirect.co.uk/MUHome/cshtml/ socinf/obed.html (2001).
27. Broida, J., Tingley, L., Kimball, R. & Miele, J. (1993). Personality differences between pro- and anti-vivisectionists. Web site http://www.psyeta. org/ sa/sal.2/broida.html.
28. American Association of University Women. (1992). How Schools Shortchange Girls: A Study of Major Findings of Girls and Education. Washington, DC, USA: American Association of University Women.
29. Herzog, H.A., Betchart, N.S. & Pittman, R.B. (1991). Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes towards animals. Anthrozoos 4, 184-191. Quoted in Pifer et al. (2).
30. Cramer, M.J. (2001). Testimony in support of passage of HB 1360, "An act relative to dissection choice." Submitted to the Education Committee of the Massachusetts House of Representatives.
31. Orlans, F.B. (2000). An ethical rationale for why students should not be permitted to harm or kill animals. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement, and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. M. Balls, A-M. van Zeller & M.E. Halder), pp. 1323-1331, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
32. Balcombe, J. (2000). A global overview of law and policy concerning animal use in education. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement, and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. M. Balls, A-M. van Zeller & M.E. Halder), pp. 1343-1350 Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
33. Stanley Milgram Web site (2002). http://www. stanleymilgram.com/milgram. html.
34. Damon, W. (1995). Greater Expectations: Overcoming the Culture of Indulgence in American Homes and Schools. New York, NY, USA: The Free Press.