Cervical excisional treatment of young women: A population-based study

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 132, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 628-635

  Kinney, Walter ^a   Hunt, William C ^b   Dinkelspiel, Helen ^c   Robertson, Michael ^b   Cuzick, Jack ^d   Wheeler, Cosette M ^b  

^a KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Division of Gynecologic Oncology Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

^d QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adherence to cervical treatment guidelines; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 (CIN2 and CIN3); Cervical screening; Colposcopy; Effectiveness and harms of cervical screening; Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURGERY; COLPOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TUMOR BIOPSY; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; YOUNG ADULT;

ADHERENCE TO CERVICAL TREATMENT GUIDELINES; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA GRADES 2 AND 3 (CIN2 AND CIN3); CERVICAL SCREENING; COLPOSCOPY; EFFECTIVENESS AND HARMS OF CERVICAL SCREENING; LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE (LEEP);

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOPSY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CONIZATION; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEW MEXICO; REGISTRIES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896399744     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.037     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. D. Saslow, D. Soloman, H.W. Lawson, M. Killackey, S.L. Kulasingam, and J. Cain et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer CA Cancer J Clin 62 2012 147 172
2. V.A. Moyer, and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement Ann Intern Med 156 2012 880 891
3. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins - Gynecology ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 109: cervical cytology screening Obstet Gynecol 114 2009 1409 1420
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Committee Opinion No. 463: cervical cancer in adolescents: screening, evaluation, and management Obstet Gynecol 116 2010 469 472
5. A.B. Moscicki, and J.T. Cox Practice improvement in cervical screening and management (PICSM): symposium on management of cervical abnormalities in adolescents and young women J Low Genit Tract Dis 14 2010 73 80
6. P. Sasieni, A. Castanon, and J. Cuzick Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data BMJ 339 2009 b2968 [Erratum in: BMJ 2009; 339:b3115]
7. A.B. Moscicki, Y. Ma, and C. Wibbelsman et al. Rate of and risks for regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescents and young women Obstet Gynecol 116 2010 1373 1380
8. T.C. Wright Jr., L.S. Massad, C.J. Dunton, M. Spitzer, E.J. Wilkinson, and D. Solomon 2006 ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical screening tests J Low Genit Tract Dis 11 2007 201 222 [Erratum in: J Low Genit Tract Dis 2008; 12: 255]
9. M. Kyrgiou, G. Koliopoulos, P. Martin-Hirsch, M. Arbyn, W. Prendiville, and E. Paraskevaidis Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet 367 2006 489 498
10. L. Sadler, A. Saftlas, W. Wang, M. Exeter, J. Whittaker, and L. McCowan Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery JAMA 291 2004 2100 2106
11. S.L. Samson, J.R. Bentley, T.J. Fahey, D.J. McKay, and G.H. Gill The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome Obstet Gynecol 105 2005 325 332
12. K.R. Yabroff, M. Saraiya, H.I. Meissner, D.A. Haggstrom, L. Wideroff, and G. Yuan et al. Specialty differences in primary care physician reports of Papanicolaou test screening practices: a national survey, 2006 to 2007 Ann Intern Med 151 2009 602 611
13. J.W. Lee, Z. Berkowitz, and M. Saraiya Low-risk human papillomavirus testing and other nonrecommended human papillomavirus testing practices among U.S. health care providers Obstet Gynecol 118 2011 4 13
14. K.B. Roland, A. Soman, V.B. Benard, and M. Saraiya Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests screening interval recommendations in the United States Am J Obstet Gynecol 205 2011 447.e1 447.e8
15. M. Saraiya, Z. Berkowitz, K.R. Yabroff, L. Wideroff, S. Kobrin, and V. Benard Cervical cancer screening with both human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou testing vs Papanicolaou testing alone: what screening intervals are physicians recommending? Arch Intern Med 170 2010 977 985
16. C.M. Wheeler, W.C. Hunt, and J. Cuzick et al. A population-based study of human papillomavirus genotype prevalence in the United States: baseline measures prior to mass human papillomavirus vaccination Int J Cancer 132 1 Jan 1 2013 198 207
17. P.E. Castle, M. Schiffman, C.M. Wheeler, and D. Solomon Evidence for frequent regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 2 Obstet Gynecol 113 2009 18 25
18. A.J. Robertson, J.M. Anderson, and J.S. Beck et al. Observer variability in histopathological reporting of cervical biopsy specimens J Clin Pathol 42 1989 231 238
19. T.C. Wright Jr., L.S. Massad, C.J. Dunton, M. Spitzer, E.J. Wilkinson, and D. Solomon 2006 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology-sponsored Consensus Conference. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ J Low Genit Tract Dis 11 2007 223 239
20. R.G. Pretorius, W.H. Zhang, and J.L. Belinson et al. Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 2004 430 434
21. M.H. Stoler, M.D. Vichnin, and A. Ferenczy et al. FUTURE I, II and III Investigators. The accuracy of colposcopic biopsy: analyses from the placebo arm of the Gardasil clinical trials Int J Cancer 128 2011 1354 1362
22. J.T. Cox More questions about the accuracy of colposcopy: what does this mean for cervical cancer prevention? Obstet Gynecol 111 2008 1266 1267
23. R.G. Pretorius, J.L. Belinson, R.J. Burchette, S. Hu, X. Zhang, and Y.L. Qiao Regardless of skill, performing more biopsies increases the sensitivity of colposcopy J Low Genit Tract Dis 15 2011 180 188
24. T.M. Darragh, T.J. Colgan, and J.T. Cox et al. LAST Project Work Groups. The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology J Low Genit Tract Dis 16 2012 205 242