Significance of atypia in pancreatic and bile duct brushings: Follow-Up analysis of the categories atypical and suspicious for malignancy

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 285-291

  Chadwick, Barbara E ^a   Layfield, Lester J ^b   Witt, Benjamin L ^a   Schmidt, Robert L ^a   Cox, R N Kristin ^a,c   Adler, Douglas G ^a  

^a ARUP LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b University of Missouri   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

bile duct; biliary; brushing; cytology; pancreatic

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CANCER; BILE DUCT TUMOR; BRUSHING CYTOLOGY; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

BILE DUCT; BILIARY; BRUSHING; CYTOLOGY; PANCREATIC;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; BILE DUCTS; CHOLANGITIS, SCLEROSING; CYTODIAGNOSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896397696     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: 10970339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.23035     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bardales RH, Stanley MW, Simpson DD, Baker SJ, Steele CT, Schaefer RF,. Diagnostic value of brush cytology in the diagnosis of duodenal, biliary and ampullary neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 109: 540-548.
2. de Peralta-Venturina MN, Wong DK, Purslow MJ, Kini SR,. Biliary tract cytology in specimens obtained by direct cholangiographic procedures: A study of 74 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1996; 14: 334-348.
3. Desa LA, Akosa AB, Lazzara S, et al. Cytodiagnosis in the management of extrahepatic biliary stricture. Gut 1991; 32: 1188-1191.
4. Farrell RJ, Jain AK, Brandwein SL, Wang H, Chuttani R, Pleskow DK,. The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 587-594.
5. Ferrari AP Jr,., Lichtenstein DR, Slivka A, Chang C, CarrLocke DI., Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 140-145.
6. Foutch PG, Harlan JR, Kerr D, Sanowski RA,. Wire-guided brush cytology: A new endoscopic method for diagnosis of bile duct cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35: 243-247.
7. Foutch PG, Kerr DM, Harlan JR, Kummet TD,. Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 791-795.
8. Glasbrenner B, Ardan M, Boeck W, Preclik G, Moller P, Adler G,. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 712-717.
9. Govil H, Reddy V, Kluskens L, et al. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: Retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 26: 273-277.
10. Iwao T, Hanada K, Tsuchida A, Hirata M, Eguchi N, Kajiyama G,. The establishment of a preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma using cell specimens from pancreatic duct brushing with special attention to p53 mutations. Cancer 1998; 82: 1487-1494.
11. Jailwala J, Fogel EL, Sherman S, et al. Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 383-390.
12. Kocjan G, Nisbet-Smith A,. Bile duct brushings cytology: Potential pitfalls in diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 16: 358-363.
13. Kurzawinski T, Deery A, Dooley JS, Dick R, Hobbs KE, Davidson BR,. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures. Hepatology 1993; 18: 1399-1403.
14. Layfield LJ, Wax TD, Lee JG, Cotton PB,. Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary brushings. Acta Cytol 1995; 39: 11-18.
15. Lee JG, Leung JW, Baillie J, Layfield LJ, Cotton PB,. Benign, dysplastic or malignant-making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: Results in 149 consecutive patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 722-726.
16. Henke AC, Jensen CS, Cohen MB,. Cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in biliary and pancreatic duct brushings. Adv Anat Pathol 2002; 9: 301-308.
17. Barr Fritcher EG, Kipp BR, Halling KC, et al. A multivariable model using advanced cytologic methods for the evaluation of indeterminate pancreatobiliary strictures. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 2180-2186.
18. Geraci G, Pisello F, Arnone E, Modica G, Sciumè C,. Endoscopic cytology in biliary strictures. Personal experience. G Chir 2008; 29: 403-406.
19. Selvaggi SM,. Biliary brush cytology. Cytopathology 2004; 15: 74-79.
20. Renshaw AA, Madge R, Jiroutek M, Granter SR,. Bile duct brushing cytology: Statistical analysis of proposed diagnostic criteria. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 110: 635-640.
21. Volmar KE, Vollmer RT, Routbort MJ, Creager AJ,. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases. Review of findings and comparison of preparation methods. Cancer 2006; 108: 231-238.
22. Pugliese V, Conio M, Nicolo G, Saccomanno S, Gatteschi B,. Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 520-526.
23. Rabinovitz M, Zajko AB, Hassanein T,. Diagnostic value of brush cytology in the diagnosis of bile duct carcinoma: A study in 65 patients with bile duct strictures. Hepatology 1990; 12: 747-752.
24. Rupp M, Hawthorne C, Ehya H,. Brushing cytology in biliary tract obstruction. Acta Cytol 1990; 34: 221-226.
25. Ryan ME, Baldauf MC,. Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreatobiliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 133-139.
26. Stewart CJR, Mills PR, Carter R, et al. Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: A review of 406 cases. J Clin Pathol 2001; 54: 449-455.
27. Ponchon T, Gagnon P, Berger F, et al. Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis: Results of a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 565-572.
28. Mansfield JC, Griffin SM, Wadehra V, Matthewson K,. A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures. Gut 1997; 40: 671-677.
29. Macken E, Drijkoningen M, Van Aken E, Van Steenbergen W,. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2000; 63: 254-259.
30. Cohen MB, Wittchow RJ, Johlin FC, Bottles K, Raab SS,. Brush cytology of the extrahepatic biliary tract: Comparison of cytologic features of adenocarcinoma and benign biliary strictures. Mod Pathol 1995; 8: 498-502.
31. Layfield L, Wax T, Lee J, Cotton P,. Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary duct brushings. Acta Cytol 1995; 39: 11-18.
32. Cohen MB, Egerter DP, Holly EA, Ahn DK, Miller TR,. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Regression analysis to identify improved cytologic criteria. Diagn Cytopathol 1991; 7: 341-345.
33. Nakajima T, Tajima Y, Sugano I, et al. Multivariate statistical analysis of bile cytology. Acta Cytol 1994; 38: 51-55.
34. Okonkwo AM, De Frias DVS, Gunn R, Diaz L, et al. Reclassification of "atypical" diagnoses in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography: Guided biliary brushings. Acta Cytol 2003; 47: 435-441.
35. Layfield LJ, Cramer H,. Primary sclerosing cholangitis as a cause of false positive bile duct brushing cytology: Report of two cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 32: 119-124.
36. Cuzick J,. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med 1985; 4: 87-90.
37. Chadwick BE,. Beyond cytomorphology: Expanding the diagnostic potential for biliary cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2012; 40: 936-541.
38. Witt BL, Hilden K, Scaife C, et al. Identification of factors predictive of malignancy in patients with atypical biliary brushing results obtained via ERCP. Diagn Cytopathol 2013; 41: 682-688.