A Multivariable Model Using Advanced Cytologic Methods for the Evaluation of Indeterminate Pancreatobiliary Strictures

Gastroenterology

Volumn 136, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 2180-2186

  Barr Fritcher, Emily G ^a   Kipp, Benjamin R ^a   Halling, Kevin C ^a   Oberg, Trynda N ^a   Bryant, Sandra C ^a   Tarrell, Robert F ^a   Gores, Gregory J ^a   Levy, Michael J ^a   Clayton, Amy C ^a   Sebo, Thomas J ^a   Roberts, Lewis R ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DIGITAL IMAGING; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREATOBILIARY STRICTURE; PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TETRAPLOIDY; TETRASOMY; TRISOMY;

EID: 66149097724     PISSN: 00165085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.040     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Lindberg B., Arnelo U., Bergquist A., et al. Diagnosis of biliary strictures in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, with special reference to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy 34 (2002) 909-916
2. Ponchon T., Gagnon P., Berger F., et al. Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis: results of a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 42 (1995) 565-572
3. Jailwala J., Fogel E.L., Sherman S., et al. Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 383-390
4. Pugliese V., Conio M., Nicolo G., et al. Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 42 (1995) 520-526
5. Singh Saluja S., Sharma R., Pal S., et al. Differentiation between benign and malignant hilar obstructions using laboratory and radiological investigations: a prospective study. HPB (Oxford) 9 (2007) 373-382
6. Akdogan M., Parlak E., Kayhan B., et al. Are serum and biliary carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 determinations reliable for differentiation between benign and malignant biliary disease?. Turk J Gastroenterol 14 (2003) 181-184
7. Maestranzi S., Przemioslo R., Mitchell H., et al. The effect of benign and malignant liver disease on the tumour markers CA 19-9 and CEA. Ann Clin Biochem 35 (1998) 99-103
8. Levy C., Lymp J., Angulo P., et al. The value of serum CA 19-9 in predicting cholangiocarcinomas in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Dig Dis Sci 50 (2005) 1734-1740
9. Govil H., Reddy V., Kluskens L., et al. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 26 (2002) 273-277
10. Kipp B.R., Stadheim L.M., Halling S.A., et al. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 1675-1681
11. Logrono R., Kurtycz D.F., Molina C.P., et al. Analysis of false-negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures: the experience at 2 university hospitals. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124 (2000) 387-392
12. Weber A., von Weyhern C., Fend F., et al. Endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 14 (2008) 1097-1101
13. McCarthy D.M., Maitra A., Argani P., et al. Novel markers of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in fine-needle aspiration: mesothelin and prostate stem cell antigen labeling increases accuracy in cytologically borderline cases. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 11 (2003) 238-243
14. Willmore-Payne C., Volmar K.E., Huening M.A., et al. Molecular diagnostic testing as an adjunct to morphologic evaluation of pancreatic ductal system brushings: potential augmentation for diagnostic sensitivity. Diagn Cytopathol 35 (2007) 218-224
15. Salek C., Benesova L., Zavoral M., et al. Evaluation of clinical relevance of examining K-ras, p16 and p53 mutations along with allelic losses at 9p and 18q in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration samples of patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 13 (2007) 3714-3720
16. Krishnamurthy S., Katz R.L., Shumate A., et al. DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing. Cancer 93 (2001) 229-235
17. Baron T.H., Harewood G.C., Rumalla A., et al. A prospective comparison of digital image analysis and routine cytology for the identification of malignancy in biliary tract strictures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2 (2004) 214-219
18. Moreno Luna L.E., Kipp B., Halling K.C., et al. Advanced cytologic techniques for the detection of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures. Gastroenterology 131 (2006) 1064-1072
19. Barr Fritcher E.G., Kipp B.R., Slezak J.M., et al. Correlating routine cytology, quantitative nuclear morphometry by digital image analysis, and genetic alterations by fluorescence in situ hybridization to assess the sensitivity of cytology for detecting pancreatobiliary tract malignancy. Am J Clin Pathol 128 (2007) 272-279
20. Rumalla A., Baron T.H., Leontovich O., et al. Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic biliary brush cytology by digital image analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 76 (2001) 29-33
21. Levy M.J., Baron T.H., Clayton A.C., et al. Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 103 (2008) 1263-1273
22. Cohen M.B., Wittchow R.J., Johlin F.C., et al. Brush cytology of the extrahepatic biliary tract: comparison of cytologic features of adenocarcinoma and benign biliary strictures. Mod Pathol 8 (1995) 498-502
23. Renshaw A.A., Madge R., Jiroutek M., et al. Bile duct brushing cytology: statistical analysis of proposed diagnostic criteria. Am J Clin Pathol 110 (1998) 635-640
24. Logrono R., Kurtycz D.F., Sproat I.A., et al. Multidisciplinary approach to deep-seated lesions requiring radiologically-guided fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 18 (1998) 338-342
25. Sebo T.J. Digital image analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 70 (1995) 81-82
26. Kurzawinski T., Deery A., and Davidson B.R. Diagnostic value of cytology for biliary stricture. Br J Surg 80 (1993) 414-421
27. Elek G., Gyokeres T., Schafer E., et al. Early diagnosis of pancreatobiliary duct malignancies by brush cytology and biopsy. Pathol Oncol Res 11 (2005) 145-155
28. Lee J.G. Brush cytology and the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 78-80
29. De Bellis M., Sherman S., Fogel E.L., et al. Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (part 1). Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 552-561
30. Broberg K., Toksvig-Larsen S., Lindstrand A., et al. Trisomy 7 accumulates with age in solid tumors and non-neoplastic synovia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 30 (2001) 310-315
31. Al-Mofleh I.A., Aljebreen A.M., Al-Amri S.M., et al. Biochemical and radiological predictors of malignant biliary strictures. World J Gastroenterol 10 (2004) 1504-1507
32. Mahmoudi N., Enns R., Amar J., et al. Biliary brush cytology: factors associated with positive yields on biliary brush cytology. World J Gastroenterol 14 (2008) 569-573