Primary sclerosing cholangitis as a cause of false positive bile duct brushing cytology: Report of two cases

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 119-124

  Layfield, Lester J ^a   Cramer, Harvey ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Brushing cytology; Dysplasia; False positive diagnosis; Primary sclerosing cholangitis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT; BILE DUCT BRUSH CYTOLOGY; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; CANCER SCREENING; CASE REPORT; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL FEATURE; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE COURSE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; LIVER BIOPSY; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MULTIPLE ORGAN FAILURE; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; BILE DUCTS, EXTRAHEPATIC; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; CHOLANGITIS, SCLEROSING; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 12744253456     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.20192     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Lee Y-M, Kaplan MM. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. New Engl J Med 1995;332:924-933.
2. Boberg KM, Lundin KEA, Schrumpf E. Etiology and pathogenesis in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1994;204: 47-58.
3. Harnois DM, Lindor KD. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: evolving concepts in diagnosis and treatment. Dig Dis 1997;15:23-41.
4. Harrison PM. Prevention of bile duct cancer in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Ann Oncol 1999;4(Suppl):5208-5211.
5. Farrant JM, Hayllar KM, Wilkinson ML, et al. Natural history and prognostic variables in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology 1991;100:1710-1717.
6. Kornfeld D, Ekbom A, Ihre T. Survival and risk of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholungitis. A population-based study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:1042-1045.
7. Schrumpf E, Abdelnoor M, Fausa D, et al. Risk factors in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol 1994;21:1061-1066.
8. De Peralta-Venturina MN, Wong DK, Purslow MJ, Kini SR. Biliary tract cytology in specimens obtained by direct cholangiographic procedures: a study of 74 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;14:334-348.
9. Govil H, Reddy V, Kluskens L, et al. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;26:273-277.
10. Kocjan G, Smith AN. Bile duct brushing cytology: potential pitfalls in diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16:358-363.
11. Layfield LJ, Wax T, Lee JG, Cotton PB. Accuracy and morphologic-aspects of pancreatic biliary duct brushings. Acta Cytol 1995;39:11-18.
12. Lee LG, Leung JW, Baillie J, Layfield LJ, Cotton PB. Benign, dysplastic or malignant-making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:722-726.
13. Cohen MB, Wittchow RJ, Johlin FC, Bottles K, Raab SS. Brush cytology of the extrahepatic biliary tract: comparison of cytologic features of adenocarcinoma and benign biliary strictures. Mod Pathol 1995;8:498-502.
14. Renshaw AA, Madge R, Jiroutek M, Granten SR. Bile duct brushing cytology. Statistical analysis of proposed diagnostic criteria. Am J Clin Pathol 1998;110:635-640.
15. Nakajima T, Tajima Y, Sugano I, et al. Multivariate statistical analysis of bile cytology. Acta Cytol 1994;38:51-55.
16. Rabinovitz M, Zajko AB, Hassanein T, et al. Diagnostic value of brush cytology in the diagnosis of bile duct carcinoma: a study in 65 patients with bile duct strictures. Hepatology 1990;12:747-752.
17. Kurzawinski T, Deery A, Dooley J, Dick R, Hobbs K, Davidson B. A prospective controlled study comparing brush and bile exfoliative cytology for diagnosing bile duct strictures. Gut 1992;33:1675-1677.
18. Ponchon T, Gagnon P, Berger F, et al. Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis: results of a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:565-572.
19. Pugliese V, Conio M, Nicolo G, Saccomanno S, Gatteschi B. Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:520-526.
20. Mansfield JC, Griffin SM, Wadehra V, Matthewson K. A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures. Gut 1997;40:671-677.
21. Lindberg B, Arnelo U, Bergquist A, et al. Diagnosis of biliary strictures in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopanereatography with special reference to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy 2002;34:909-916.
22. Ponsioen CY, Vrouenraets SME, van Milligen de Wit AWM, et al. Value of brush cytology for dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy 1999;31:305-309.
23. Stiehl A. Value of brush border cytology for dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy 1999;31:333-334.
24. Van Leeuwen DJ. Reeders JWAJ. Primary sclerosing cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma as a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. Ann Oncol 1999;4(Suppl):589-593.
25. Batheja N, Suriawinata A, Saxena R, Ionescu G, Schwartz M, Thung SN. Expression of p53 and PCNA in cholangiocarcinoma and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Mod Pathol 2000;13:1265-1268.
26. Ahrendt SA, Eisenberger CF, Yip L, Rashid A, Chow JT, Pitt HA, Sidransky. Chromosome 9p21 loss and p16 inactivation in primary sclerosing cholangitis-associated cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Res 1999;84:88-93.
27. Stewart CJR, Burke GM. Value of p5.3 immunostaining in pancreaticobiliary brush cytology specimens. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;23:308-313.
28. Albores-Saavedra J, Henson DE. Gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts. In: Henson DE, Albores-Saavedra J, editors. The pathology of incipient neoplasia. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.; 1986. p 212-213.