Intraindividual comparison of diagnostic performance in patients with hepatic metastasis of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source abdominal computed tomography

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 195-200

  Park, Mina ^a   Chung, Yong Eun ^a   Lee, Hye Sun ^a   Choi, Jin Young ^a   Park, Mi Suk ^a   Kim, Myeong Jin ^a   Kim, Ki Whang ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

abdominal CT scan; hepatic metastasis; image noise; iterative reconstruction; radiation dose

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LIVER; LIVER METASTASIS; LIVER PARENCHYMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPLEEN; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL; RADIOGRAPHY, DUAL-ENERGY SCANNED PROJECTION; RADIOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84896319616     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000014     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomographyVan increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277-2284
2. Hendee WR, O'Connor MK. Radiation risks of medical imaging: Separating fact from fantasy. Radiology. 2012;264:312-321
3. McCollough CH, Guimarães L, Fletcher JG. In defense of body CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:28-39
4. Chawla SC, Federman N, Zhang D, et al. Estimated cumulative radiation dose from PET/CT in children with malignancies: A 5-year retrospective review. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:681-686
5. Wall B, Haylock R, Jansen J, et al. Radiation risks from medical x-ray examinations as a function of the age and sex of the patient: Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Health Protection Agency 2011
6. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:499-505
7. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, et al. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:202
8. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, et al. Abdominal CT: Comparison of lowdose ct with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195: 713-719
9. Brooks RA, Di Chiro G. Theory of image reconstruction in computed tomography. Radiology. 1975;117:561
10. May MS, Wust W, Brand M, et al. Dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography: Intraindividual comparison of image quality of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:465
11. Schindera ST, Diedrichsen L, Muller HC, et al. Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: Assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a phantom study. Radiology. 2011;260:454-462
12. Moscariello A, Takx RAP, Schoepf UJ, et al. Coronary CT angiography: Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction techniqueVcomparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2130-2138
13. Winklehner A, Karlo C, Puippe G, et al. Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: Evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21:2521-2526
14. Baker ME, Dong F, Primak A, et al. Contrast-To-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full-And low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:8-18
15. Fletcher JG, Grant KLR, Fidler JL, et al. Validation of dual-source single-Tube reconstruction as a method to obtain half-dose images to evaluate radiation dose and noise reduction: Phantom and human assessment using CT colonography and sinogram-Affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36:560-569
16. Kalra MK, Woisetschläger M, Dahlström N, et al. Radiation dose reduction with sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36:339
17. Schabel C, Fenchel M, Schmidt B, et al. Clinical evaluation and potential radiation dose reduction of the novel sinogram-Affirmed iterative reconstruction technique (SAFIRE) in abdominal computed tomography angiography. Acad Radiol. 2013;20:165-172
18. Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:126-131
19. Lee KH, Lee JM, Moon SK, et al. Attenuation-based automatic tube voltage selection and tube current modulation for dose reduction at contrast-enhanced liver CT. Radiology. 2012;265:437-447
20. Dietrich CF, Kratzer W, Strobel D, et al. Assessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:1699
21. RadiologyInfo.org. [Web site]. Available at: Http://www.radiologyinfo. org/en/ safety. Accessed September 23, 2013
22. Chang W, Lee JM, Lee K, et al. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:598-606
23. Martinsen ACT, Sther HK, Hol PK, et al. Iterative reconstruction reduces abdominal CT dose. Eur J Radiol. 2011;81:1483-1487
24. Hanson KM. Detectability in the presence of computed tomographic reconstruction noise. Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine VI: International Society for Optics and Photonics 1977:304-312
25. Kalra MK, Woisetschläger M, Dahlström N, et al. Sinogram-Affirmed iterative reconstruction of low-dose chest CT: Effect on image quality and radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:W235YW244
26. Vachha B, Brodoefel H, Wilcox C, et al. Radiation dose reduction in soft tissue neck CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR). Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:2222-2226