Radiation dose reduction in soft tissue neck CT using adaptivestatistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR)

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 82, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 2222-2226

  Vachha, Behroze ^a   Brodoefel, Harald ^b   Wilcox, Carol ^b   Hackney, David B ^b   Moonis, Gul ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

ASIR; CT; Neck; Radiation dose

Indexed keywords

IOHEXOL;

ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FILTERED BACK PROJECTION; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION ATTENUATION; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RADIATION RESPONSE; RADIOLOGIST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOFT TISSUE; STERNOCLEIDOMASTOID MUSCLE;

ASIR; CT; NECK; RADIATION-DOSE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFT TISSUE NEOPLASMS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890806710     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Radiation CtAHRfEtLLoI, Council NR. Health risks from exposure to low lev-els of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. The National Academies Press;2006.
2. Amis Jr ES, Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiologywhite paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4(5):272-84.
3. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiationexposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357(22):2277-84.
4. Lauer MS. Elements of danger - the case of medical imaging. N Engl J Med2009;361(9):841-3.
5. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W. Iterative recon-struction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study.AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(3):764-71.
6. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduc-Tion strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstructionalgorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(1):191-9.
7. Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J. A three-dimensional statisti-cal approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys2007;34(11):4526-44.
8. Kilic K, Erbas G, Guryildirim M, Arac M, Ilgit E, Coskun B. Lowering the dose inhead CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuro-radiol 2011;32(9):1578-82.
9. Korn A, Fenchel M, Bender B, et al. Iterative reconstruction in head CT: imagequality of routine and low-dose protocols in comparison with standard filteredback-projection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33(2):218-24.
10. Niu Y, Wang Z, Liu Y, Liu Z, Yao V. Radiation dose to the lens using different tem-poral bone CT scanning protocols. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31(2):226-9.
11. Tumur O, Soon K, Brown F, Mykytowycz M. New scanning technique usingadaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) significantly reduced theradiation dose of cardiac CT. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2013;57(3):292-6.
12. Gebhard C, Fuchs TA, Fiechter M, et al. Image quality of low-dose CCTA in obesepatients: impact of high-definition computed tomography and adaptive sta-Tistical iterative reconstruction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013
13. Gebhard C, Fiechter M, Fuchs TA, et al. Coronary artery stents: influence ofadaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on image quality using 64-HDCT.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013
14. Fuchs TA, Fiechter M, Gebhard C, et al. CT coronary angiography: impact ofadapted statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on coronary stenosis andplaque composition analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29(3):719-24.
15. Gebhard C, Fiechter M, Fuchs TA, et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring: influ-ence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction using 64-MDCT. Int J Cardiol2012
16. Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J, et al. Chest computed tomography usingiterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality oflow-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 2011;21(3):636-43.
17. Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T, et al. Chest computed tomography using iterativereconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noisereduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 2011;21(3):627-35.
18. Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstructiontechnique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology2011;259(2):565-73.
19. Shuman WP, Green DE, Busey JM, et al. Model-based iterative reconstructionversus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projectionin liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise.AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(5):1071-6.
20. Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statisti-cal iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology2010;257(2):373-83.
21. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on RadiologicalProtection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37(2-4):1-332.
22. Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specificconversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product.Radiology 2010;257(1):158-66.
23. Kalender W. Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, imagequality, applications. Erlangen: Publicis Publishing; 2011.
24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categoricaldata. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-74.