Quantitative analysis of emphysema and airway measurements according to iterative reconstruction algorithms: Comparison of filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction

European Radiology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 799-806

  Choo, Ji Yung ^a,c   Goo, Jin Mo ^a,b   Lee, Chang Hyun ^a   Park, Chang Min ^a,b   Park, Sang Joon ^a,b   Shim, Mi Suk ^a  

^a Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Computed tomography; Iterative reconstruction; Pulmonary emphysema; Quantitative analysis

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EMPHYSEMA; FEMALE; FILTERED BACK PROJECTION; HUMAN; LUNG EMPHYSEMA; LUNG PARENCHYMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MIDDLE AGED; MODEL BASED ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RADIOLOGY PHANTOM; THICKNESS; TOTAL LUNG CAPACITY; VERY ELDERLY; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BRONCHOGRAPHY; EMPHYSEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896313470     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-3078-5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ et al (2008) Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radiographics 28:1451-1459
2. Lee TY, Chhem RK (2010) Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT. Eur J Radiol 76:28-35
3. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CTwith adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:713-719
4. Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M et al (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 22:1613-1623
5. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:764-771
6. Mitsumori LM, Shuman WP, Busey JM, Kolokythas O, Koprowicz KM(2012) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol 22:138-143
7. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR et al (2010) Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:40-45
8. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191-199
9. Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y et al (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose computed tomography of the lung: a pilot study. Invest Radiol 47:482-489
10. Xie X, de Jong PA, Oudkerk M et al (2012) Morphological measurements in computed tomography correlate with airflow obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 22:2085-2093
11. Yoon SH, Goo JM, Goo HW (2013) Quantitative thoracic CT techniques in adults: can they be applied in the pediatric population? Pediatr Radiol 43:308-314
12. Boedeker KL, McNitt-Gray MF, Rogers SR et al (2004) Emphysema: effect of reconstruction algorithm on CT imaging measures. Radiology 232:295-301 (Pubitemid 38787852)
13. Gierada DS, Bierhals AJ, Choong CK et al (2010) Effects of CT section thickness and reconstruction kernel on emphysema quantification relationship to the magnitude of the CT emphysema index. Acad Radiol 17:146-156
14. Park SJ, Lee CH, Goo JM, Heo CY, Kim JH (2012) Inter-scan repeatability of CT-based lung densitometry in the surveillance of emphysema in a lung cancer screening setting. Eur J Radiol 81:e554-e560
15. Mets OM, Willemink MJ, de Kort FP et al (2012) The effect of iterative reconstruction on computed tomography assessment of emphysema, air trapping and airway dimensions. Eur Radiol 22:2103-2109
16. Nishio M, Matsumoto S, Ohno Y et al (2012) Emphysema quantification by low-dose CT: potential impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction using 3D processing. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:595-601
17. Makita H, Nasuhara Y, Nagai K et al (2007) Characterisation of phenotypes based on severity of emphysema in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 62:932-937 (Pubitemid 350084489)
18. Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD et al (2011) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology 259:565-573
19. Hesselbacher SE, Ross R, Schabath MB et al (2011) Cross-sectional analysis of the utility of pulmonary function tests in predicting emphysema in ever-smokers. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8:1324-1340
20. Gierada DS, Pilgram TK, Whiting BR et al (2007) Comparison of standard- and low-radiation-dose CT for quantification of emphysema. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:42-47 (Pubitemid 46012488)
21. Kinsella M, Müller NL, Abboud RT, Morrison NJ, DyBuncio A (1990) Quantitation of emphysema by computed tomography using a "density mask" program and correlation with pulmonary function tests. Chest 97:315-321 (Pubitemid 20050666)
22. Gevenois PA, de Maertelaer V, De Vuyst P, Zanen J, Yernault JC (1995) Comparison of computed density and macroscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152:653-657
23. Gevenois PA, De Vuyst P, de Maertelaer Vet al (1996) Comparison of computed density and microscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154:187-192 (Pubitemid 26255788)
24. Yuan R, Mayo JR, Hogg JC et al (2007) The effects of radiation dose and CT manufacturer on measurements of lung densitometry. Chest 132:617-623 (Pubitemid 47282397)
25. Park KJ, Bergin CJ, Clausen JL (1999) Quantitation of emphysema with three-dimensional CT densitometry: comparison with two-dimensional analysis, visual emphysema scores, and pulmonary function test results. Radiology 211:541-547 (Pubitemid 29206828)
26. Takahashi M, Okada H, Oguni N et al (2011) How accurate is CT morphometry of airway? Phantomand clinical validation study. Eur J Radiol 80:e524-e530
27. Bafadhel M, Umar I, Gupta S et al (2011) The role of CT scanning in multidimensional phenotyping of COPD. Chest 140:634-642
28. Madani A, De Maertelaer V, Zanen J, Gevenois PA (2007) Pulmonary emphysema: radiation dose and section thickness at multidetector CT quantification - comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. Radiology 243:250-257 (Pubitemid 46579717)