Antibacterial activity of large-area monolayer graphene film manipulated by charge transfer

Scientific Reports

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Li, Jinhua ^a   Wang, Gang ^b   Zhu, Hongqin ^a   Zhang, Miao ^b   Zheng, Xiaohu ^b   Di, Zengfeng ^b   Liu, Xuanyong ^a   Wang, Xi ^b  

^a SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS   (China)

^b LANZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; COPPER; GERMANIUM; GRAPHITE; SILICON DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STATIC ELECTRICITY; SYNTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; CELL MEMBRANE; COPPER; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GERMANIUM; GRAPHITE; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SILICON DIOXIDE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

EID: 84896312410     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep04359     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Novoselov, K. S. et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666-669; DOI:10.1126/science.1102896 (2004). (Pubitemid 39440910)
2. Geim, A. K. & Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 6, 183-191; DOI:10.1038/nmat1849 (2007). (Pubitemid 46353764)
3. Geim, A. K. Graphene: Status and prospects. Science 324, 1530-1534; DOI:10.1126/science.1158877 (2009).
4. Bianco, E. et al. Stability and exfoliation of germanane: a germanium graphane analogue. ACS Nano 7, 4414-4421; DOI:10.1021/nn4009406 (2013).
5. Mannoor, M. S. et al.Graphene-based wireless bacteria detection on tooth enamel. Nat. Commun. 3, 763; DOI:10.1038/ncomms1767 (2012).
6. Nayak, T. R. et al. Graphene for controlled and accelerated osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Nano 5, 4670-4678; DOI:10.1021/nn200500h (2011).
7. Wang, G. et al. Direct growth of graphene film on germanium substrate. Sci. Rep. 3, 2465; DOI:10.1038/srep02465 (2013).
8. Hu, W. et al. Graphene-based antibacterial paper. ACS Nano 4, 4317-4323; DOI:10.1021/nn101097v (2010).
9. Akhavan, O. & Ghaderi, E. Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria. ACS Nano 4, 5731-5736; DOI:10.1021/nn101390x (2010).
10. Akhavan, O. & Ghaderi, E. Escherichia coli bacteria reduce graphene oxide to bactericidal graphene in a self-limiting manner. Carbon 50, 1853-1860; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.035 (2012).
11. Salas, E. C., Sun, Z., Lüttge, A. & Tour, J. M. Reduction of graphene oxide via bacterial respiration. ACS Nano 4, 4852-4856; DOI:10.1021/nn101081t (2010).
12. Kim, I. Y. et al. Strongly-coupled freestanding hybrid films of graphene and layered titanate nanosheets: an effective way to tailor the physicochemical and antibacterial properties of graphene film. Adv. Funct. Mater. DOI:10.1002/ adfm.201303040 (2013).
13. Tu, Y. et al. Destructive extraction of phospholipids from Escherichia coli membranes by graphene nanosheets. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 594-601; DOI:10.1038/nnano.2013.125 (2013).
14. Yu, Q. et al. Graphene segregated on Ni surfaces and transferred to insulators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 113103; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1. 2982585 (2008).
15. Li, X. et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 324, 1312-1314; DOI:10.1126/science.1171245 (2009).
16. Chen, S. et al. Oxidation resistance of graphene-coated Cu and Cu/Ni alloy. ACS Nano 5, 1321-1327; DOI:10.1021/nn103028d (2011).
17. Singh Raman, R. K. et al. Protecting copper from electrochemical degradation by graphene coating. Carbon 50, 4040-4045; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j. carbon.2012.04.048 (2012).
18. Dubey, G. P. & Ben-Yehuda, S. Intercellular nanotubes mediate bacterial communication. Cell 144, 590-600; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2011.01. 015 (2011).
19. Harris, H. W. et al. Electrokinesis is a microbial behavior that requires extracellular electron transport. PNAS 107, 326-331; DOI:10.1073/ pnas.0907468107 (2010).
20. Reguera, G. et al. Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires. Nature 435, 1098-1101; DOI:10.1038/nature03661 (2005). (Pubitemid 40910516)
21. Lovley, D. R. et al. Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration. Nature 382, 445-448; DOI:10.1038/382445a0 (1996). (Pubitemid 26264859)
22. Hartshorne, R. S. et al. Characterization of an electron conduit between bacteria and the extracellular environment. PNAS 106, 22169-22174; DOI:10.1073/ pnas.0900086106 (2009).
23. Eley, D. D. & Spivey, D. I. The semiconductivity of organic substances. Part 6.-A range of proteins. Trans. Faraday Soc. 56, 1432-1442; DOI:10.1039/ TF9605601432 (1960).
24. 2-graphene composite films: improved mass transfer, reduced charge recombination, and their enhanced photocatalytic activities. ACS Nano 5, 590-596; DOI:10.1021/nn102767d (2010).
25. Richardson, D. J. Bacterial respiration: a flexible process for a changing environment. Microbiology 146, 551-571; DOI: http://mic.sgmjournals. org/ content/146/3/551.short (2000).
26. Cassimeris, L., Lingappa, V. R. & Plopper, G. Lewin's Cells, 2nd Ed., Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Incorporated (2010).
27. Michaelson, H. B. The work function of the elements and its periodicity. J. Appl. Phys. 48, 4729-4733; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.323539 (1977). (Pubitemid 8557760)
28. Dimoulas, A., Tsipas, P., Sotiropoulos, A. & Evangelou, E. K. Fermi-level pinning and charge neutrality level in germanium. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 252110-3; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2410241 (2006). (Pubitemid 46035146)
29. 2 substrates. ACS Nano 2, 2037-2044; DOI:10.1021/nn800354m (2008).
30. 2/Si interfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 81, 1606-1608; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.363895 (1997). (Pubitemid 127572509)
31. Williams, R. Photoemission of electrons from silicon into silicon dioxide. Phys. Rev. 140, A569-A575; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140. A569 (1965).
32. Clarke, T. A. et al. Structure of a bacterial cell surface decaheme electron conduit. PNAS 108, 9384-9389; DOI:10.1073/pnas.1017200108 (2011).
33. Dimroth, P., Kaim, G. & Matthey, U. Crucial role of the membrane potential for ATP synthesis by F(1)F(o) ATP synthases. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 51-59; DOI: http:// jeb.biologists.org/content/203/1/51.abstract (2000). (Pubitemid 30079069)
34. Brock, T. D. Milestones in Microbiology. Academic Medicine 36, 847; DOI: http:// journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/1961/07000/ MilestonesinMicrobiology.51.aspx (1961).
35. Liu, S. et al. Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano 5, 6971-6980; DOI:10.1021/nn202451x (2011).
36. 60) is not due to ROS-mediated damage. Nano Lett. 8, 1539-1543; DOI:10.1021/nl0726398 (2008).
37. Tang, Y. J. et al. Charge-associated effects of fullerene derivatives on microbial structural integrity and central metabolism. Nano Lett. 7, 754-760; DOI:10.1021/ nl063020t (2007). (Pubitemid 46516061)
38. 2 nanoparticles wrapped by graphene. Adv. Mater. 24, 1084-1088; DOI:10.1002/ adma.201104110 (2012).
39. Ferrari, A. C. et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 187401; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97. 187401 (2006). (Pubitemid 44658281)
40. Moon, I. K., Lee, J., Ruoff, R. S. & Lee, H. Reduced graphene oxide by chemical graphitization. Nat. Commun. 1, 73; DOI:10.1038/ncomms1067 (2010).