In situ magnetic resonance imaging of plant roots

Vadose Zone Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Gruwel, Marco L H ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; PLANTS (BOTANY); TENSORS;

PISUM SATIVUM; ROOT GROWTH; ROOT SYSTEM; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MAPS; TRACTOGRAPHY; WATER DIFFUSION; WATER MOBILITY; WATER MOVEMENTS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

DIFFUSION; MAIZE; MOVEMENT; PLANT; RESEARCH; ROOT ARCHITECTURE; ROOT SYSTEM; VISUALIZATION; WATER;

EID: 84896259351     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15391663     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2013.08.0158     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bakker, C., R. Bhagwandien, M. Moerland, and M. Fuderer. 1993. Sus-ceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: The cylinder model revisited. Magn. Reson. Imaging 11:539-548. doi:10.1016/0730-725X(93)90473-Q
2. Bayer, J.V., F. Jaeger, and G.E. Schaumann. 2010. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxometry in soil science applications. Open Magn. Reson. J. 3:15-26.
3. Borisjuk, L., H. Rolletschek, and T. Neuberger. 2012. Surveying the plant's world by magnetic resonance imaging. Plant J. 70:129-146. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04927.x
4. Bottomley, P.A., H.H. Rogers, and T.H. Foster. 1986. NMR imaging shows water distribution and transport in plant root systems in situ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 83:87-89. doi:10.1073/pnas.83.1.87
5. Cho, H.J., E.E. Sigmund, and Y. Song. 2012. Magnetic resonance characterization of porous media using diffusion through internal magnetic fields. Materials 5:590-616. doi:10.3390/ma5040590
6. Ciccarelli, O., M. Catani, H. Johansen-Berg, C. Clark, and A. Thompson. 2008. Diffusion-based tractography in neurological disorders: Concepts, applications, and future developments. Lancet Neurol. 7:715727. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70163-7
7. Dixit, S. 2013. Translation of digital phenotypic traits: From image to commercial relevance. Paper presented at: Plant and Animal Genome XXI Conference, San Diego. 12-16 Jan. 2013.
8. Grunewald, E., and R. Knight. 2011. The effect of pore size and magnetic susceptibility on the surface NMR relaxation parameter T2*. Near Surf. Geophys.9:169-178. doi:10.3997/1873-0604.2010062
9. Gruwel, M.L.H., P.K. Ghosh, P. Latta, and D.S. Jayas. 2008. On the diffusion constant of water in wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56:59-62. doi:10.1021/jf0720537
10. Gruwel, M.L.H., P. Latta, U. Sboto-Frankenstein, and P. Gervai. 2013. Visualization of water transport pathways in plants using diffusion tensor imaging. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 35:73-82. doi:10.2528/PIERC12110506
11. Gruwel, M.L.H., P. Latta, V. Volotovskyy, M. Šramek, and B. Tomanek. 2004. Magnetic resonance imaging of seeds by use of single point acquisi- tion. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:4979-4983. doi:10.1021/jf049078f
12. Gruwel, M.L.H., X.S. Yin, M.J. Edney, S.W. Schroeder, A.W. MacGregor, and S. Abrams. 2002. Barley viability during storage: Use of magnetic resonance as a potential tool to study viability loss. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:667-676. doi:10.1021/jf0108617
13. Haber-Pohlmeier, S., M. Bechtold, S. Stapf, and A. Pohlmeier. 2010. Water flow monitored by tracer transport in natural porous media using magnetic resonance imaging. Vadose Zone J. 9:835-845. doi:10.2136/vzj2009.0177
14. Hillnhutter, C., R.A. Sikora, E.-C. Oerke, and D. van Dusschoten. 2011. Nuclear magnetic resonance: A tool for imaging belowground damage caused by Heterodera schachtii and Rhizoctonia solani on sugar beet. J. Exp. Bot. 63:319-327. doi:10.1093/jxb/err273
15. Hürlimann, M.D. 1998. Effective gradients in porous media due to susceptibility differences. J. Magn. Reson. 131:232-240. doi:10.1006/jmre.1998.1364
16. 1H NMR relaxometry for the assessment of pore-size distribution in soil samples. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 60:1052-1064. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01192.x
17. Jones, D., M. Horsfield, and A. Simmons. 1999. Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 42:515-525.
18. Kingsley, P.B. 2006. Introduction to diffusion tensor imaging mathematics: II. Anisotropy, diffusion-weighting factors, and gradi ent encoding schemes. Concepts Magn. Reson. A 28:123-154. doi:10.1002/cmr.a.20049
19. Köckenberger, W., C. De Panfilis, D. Santoro, P. Dahiya, and S. Raw- sthorne. 2004. High resolution NMR microscopy of plants and fungi. J. Microsc. 214:182-189. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01351.x
20. Larkman, D.J., and R.G. Nunes. 2007. Parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 52(7):R15. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/7/R01
21. Le Bihan, D., J.-F. Mangin, C. Poupon, C.A. Clark, S. Pappata, N. Molko, and H. Chabriat. 2001. Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13:534-546. doi:10.1002/jmri.1076
22. MacFall, J.S., and G.A. Johnson. 1996. Plants, seeds, roots, and soils as applications of magnetic resonance microscopy. In: eMagRes. John Wiley & Sons, New York. doi:10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm0396.pub2
23. MacFall, J., G. Johnson, and P. Kramer. 1991. Comparative water uptake by roots of different ages in seedlings of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). New Phytol. 119:551-560. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1991.tb01047.x
24. Matsushima, U., N. Kardjilov, A. Hilger, W. Graf, and W. Herppich. 2008. Application potential of cold neutron radiography in plant science research. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 82:90-98.
25. Merboldt, K.-D., W. Hanicke, and J. Frahm. 1985. Self-diffusion NMR imaging using stimulated echoes. J. Magn. Reson. 64:479-486. doi:10.1016/0022-2364(85)90111-8
26. Mohnke and N. Klizsch. 2010. Microscale simulations of NMR relaxation in porous media considering internal field gradients. Vadose Zone J. 9:846-847. doi:10.2136/vzj2009.0161
27. Mooney, S., T. Pridmore, J. Helliwell, and M. Bennett. 2012. Developing x- ray computed tomography to non-invasively image 3-D root systems architec+ure in soil. Plant Soil 352:1-22. doi:10.1007/s11104-011-1039-9
28. Moradi, A.B., A. Carminati, D. Vetterlein, P. Vontobel, E. Lehmann, U. Weller, et al. 2011. Three-dimensional visualization and quantification of water content in the rhizosphere. New Phytol. 192:653-663. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03826.x
29. Moradi, A.B., H.M. Conesa, B. Robinson, E. Lehmann, G. Kuehne, A. Kaest- ner, et al. 2009. Neutron radiography as a tool for revealing root development in soil: Capabilities and limitations. Plant Soil 318:243-255. doi:10.1007/s11104-008-9834-7
30. Nagel, K.A., A. Putz, F. Gilmer, K. Heinz, A. Fischbach, J. Pfeifer, et al. 2012. GROWSCREEN-Rhizo is a novel phenotyping robot enabling simultaneous measurements of root and shoot growth for plants grown in soil-filled rhizotrons. Funct. Plant Biol. 39:891-904.
31. Omasa, K., M. Onoe, and H. and Yamada. 1985. NMR imaging for measuring root system and soil water content. Environ. Control Biol. 23:99-102.
32. Perret, J., M. Al-Belushi, and M. Deadman. 2007. Non-destructive visualization and quantification of roots using computed tomography. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39:391-399. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.07.018
33. Pohlmeier, A., A. Oros-Peusquens, M. Javaux, M. Menzel, J. Vanderborght, J. Kaffanke, et al. 2008. Changes in soil water content resulting from root uptake monitored by magnetic resonance imaging. Vadose Zone J. 7:1010-1017. doi:10.2136/vzj2007.0110
34. Rane, S., G. Nair, and T.Q. Duong. 2010. DTI at long diffusion time improves fiber tracking. NMR Biomed. 23:459-465. doi:10.1002/nbm.1482
35. Scheenen, T.W.J., F.J. Vergeldt, A.M. Heemskerk, and H. Van As. 2007. Intact plant magnetic resonance imaging to study dynamics in longdistance sap flow and flow-conducting surface area. Plant Physiol. 144:1157-1165. doi:10.1104/pp.106.089250
36. Schenck, J.F. 1996. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med. Phys. 23:815. doi:10.1118/1.597854
37. Schulz, H., J.A. Postma, D. van Dusschoten, H. Scharr, and S. Behnke. 2012. 3D reconstruction of plant roots from MRI images. In: G. Csurka and J. Braz, editors, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP), Rome. 24-26 Feb. 2012. SciTePress. p. 24-33.
38. Sen, P.N. 2004. Time-dependent diffusion coefficient as a probe of geometry. Concepts Magn. Reson. A 23:1-21. doi:10.1002/cmr.a.20017
39. Song, Y.-Q. 2010. Recent progress of nuclear magnetic resonance applications in sandstones and carbonate rocks. Vadose Zone J. 9:828-834. doi:10.2136/vzj2009.0171
40. Sejskal, E., and J. Tanner. 1965. Spin diffusion measurements: Spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J. Chem. Phys. 42:288. doi:10.1063/1.1695690
41. Stingaciu, L., H. Schulz, A. Pohlmeier, S. Behnke, H. Zilken, M. Javaux, and H. Vereecken. 2013. In situ root system architecture extraction from magnetic resonance imaging for water uptake modeling. Vadose Zone J. 12(1). doi:10.2136/vzj2012.0019
42. Terskikh, V.V., J.A. Feurtado, C. Ren, S.R. Abrams, and A.R. Kermode. 2005. Water uptake and oil distribution during imbibition of seeds of western white pine (Pinus monticola Dougl. ex D. Don) moni- tored in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging. Planta 221:17-27. doi:10.1007/s00425-004-1426-z
43. Tumlinson, L.G., H. Liu, W.K. Silk, and J.W. Hopmans. 2008. Thermal neutron computed tomography of soil water and plant roots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72:1234-1242. doi:10.2136/sssaj2007.0302
44. Wang, F.-N., T.-Y. Huang, F.-H. Lin, T.-C. Chuang, N.-K. Chen, H.-W. Chung, et al. 2005. PROPELLER EPI: An MRI technique suitable for diffusion tensor imaging at high field strength with reduced geometric distortions. Magn. Reson. Med. 54:1232-1240. doi:10.1002/mrm.20677
45. Wedeen, V.J., R.P. Wang, J.D. Schmahmann, T. Benner, W.Y.I. Tseng, G. Dai, et al. 2008. Diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging (DSI) tractography of crossing fibers. Neuroimage 41:1267-1277. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.036