The effect of pore size and magnetic susceptibility on the surface NMR relaxation parameter T*2

Near Surface Geophysics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 169-178

  Grunewald, Elliot ^a   Knight, Rosemary ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER; GEOPHYSICAL METHOD; GROUNDWATER FLOW; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MEASUREMENT METHOD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SIMULATION; WATER STORAGE;

EID: 79954620314     PISSN: 15694445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2010062     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Audoly B., Sen P.N., Ryu S. and Song Y.-Q. 2003. Correlation functions for inhomogeneous magnetic field in random media with application to a dense random pack of spheres. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 164, 154-159.
2. Brownstein K.R. and Tarr C.E. 1979. Importance of classical diffusion in NMR studies of water in biological cells. Physical Review A 19, 2446-2453.
3. Callaghan P.T., Coy A., Dykstra R., Eccles CA., Halse M.E., Hunter M.W., Mercier O.R. and Robinson J.N. 2007. New Zealand developments in Earth's field NMR. Applied Magnetic Resonance 32, 63-74.
4. Carr H. Y. and Purcell E.M. 1954. Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Physical Review 94, 630-638.
5. Chen Q., Marble A.E., Colpitts B.G. and Balcom B.J. 2005. The internal magnetic field distribution, and single exponential magnetic resonance free induction decay, in rocks. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 175, 300-308. (Pubitemid 40891686)
6. Dunn K.-J., Bergman D.J. and Latorraca G.A. 2002. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Petrophysical and Logging Applications. Pergamon.
7. Gallegos D.P., Munn K. and Smith D. 1987. A NMR technique for the analysis of pore structure: Application to materials with well-defined pore structure. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 119, 127-140. (Pubitemid 17656159)
8. Hertrich M. 2008. Imaging of groundwater with nuclear magnetic resonance. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 53, 227-248.
9. Hunt C.P., Moskowitz B.M. and Banerjee S.K. 1995. Magnetic properties of rocks and minerals. In: Rock Physics and Phase Relations: A Handbook of Physical Constants (ed. Thomas J. Ahrens), pp. 189-204. American Geophysical Union.
10. Hürlimann M.D. 1998. Effective gradients in porous media due to susceptibility differences. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 131, 232-240. (Pubitemid 128450561)
11. th Annual Logging Symposium, Expanded Abstracts, LL.
12. Kenyon W.E., Straley C and Willemsen J.F. 1988. A three-part study of NMR longitudinal relaxation properties of water-saturated sandstones. SPE Formation Evaluation 3, 622-636.
13. Legchenko A., Baltassat J.M., Beauce A. and Bernard J. 2002. Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 21-46. (Pubitemid 34850619)
14. Legchenko A. and Valla P. 2002. A review of the basic principles for proton magnetic resonance sounding measurements. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 3-19. (Pubitemid 34850618)
15. th edn. CRC Press.
16. Lubczynski M. and Roy J. 2003. Hydrogeologic interpretation and potential of the new magnetic resonance sounding (MRS) method. Journal of Hydrogeology 283, 19-40. (Pubitemid 37435795)
17. Mendelson K.S. 1993. Continuum and random-walk models of magnetic relaxation in porous media. Physical Review B 47, 1081-1083.
18. Müller M., Kooman S. and Yaramanci U. 2005. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) properties of unconsolidated sediments in field and laboratory. Near Surface Geophysics 3, 275-285. doi:10.3997/1873-0604.2005023
19. Plata J. and Rubio F. 2008. The use of MRS in the determination of hydraulic transmissivity: The case of alluvial aquifers. Journal of Applied Geophysics 66, 128-139.
20. Roy J., Rouleau A., Chouteau M. and Bureau M. 2008. Widespread occurrence of aquifers currently undetectable with the MRS technique in the Grenville geological province, Canada. Journal of Applied Geophysics 66, 82-93.
21. Schirov M., Legchenko A. and Creer G. 1991. A new direct non-invasive groundwater detection technology for Australia. Exploration Geophysics 22, 333-338.
22. Semenov A. 1987. NMR hydroscope for water prospecting. Proceedings of the Seminar on Geotomography, Hyderabad, Expanded Abstracts, 66-67.
23. Simpson J.H. and Carr H.Y. 1958. Diffusion and nuclear spin relaxation in water. Physical Review 111, 1201-1202.
24. Song Y.-Q. 2003. Using internal magnetic fields to determine pore size distributions of porous media. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A 18, 97-110. (Pubitemid 40646239)
25. Straley C., Rossini D., Vinegar H.J., Tutunjian P.N. and Morriss C.E. 1997. Core analysis by low-field NMR. The Log Analyst 38, 84-94.
26. Timur A. 1969. Pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance studies of porosity, movable fluid, and permeability of sandstones. Journal of Petroleum Technology 21, 775-786.
27. Valckenborg R.M.E., Huinink H.P., v.d. Sande J.J. and Kopinga K. 2002. Random-walk simulations of NMR dephasing effects due to uniform magnetic-field gradients in a pore. Physical Review E 65, 21306-21313.
28. Vouillamoz J.-M., Descloitres M., Bernard J., Fourcassier P. and Romagny L. 2002. Application of integrated magnetic resonance sounding and resistivity methods for borehole implementation. A case study in Cambodia. Journal of Applied Geophysics 50, 67-81. (Pubitemid 34850621)
29. Walsh D.O. 2008. Multi-channel surface NMR instrumentation and software for 1D/2D groundwater investigations. Journal of Applied Geophysics 66, 82-93.
30. Yaramanci U., Lange G. and Knoedel K. 1999. Surface NMR within a geophysical study of the aquifer at Haldensleben (Germany). Geophysical Prospecting 47, 923-943. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1999.00161.x (Pubitemid 30042237)