Reducing readmissions to detoxification: An interorganizational network perspective

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 137, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 76-82

  Spear, Suzanne E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coordination of care; Detoxification; Multilevel modeling; Network analysis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DETOXIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDUCATION; EMPLOYMENT STATUS; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HEALTH HAZARD; HEALTH PROGRAM; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; MALE; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT CARE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL NETWORK; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMUNITY CARE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT TRANSPORT; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TRENDS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMMUNITY NETWORKS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT READMISSION; PATIENT TRANSFER; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896102168     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: 18790046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Adm. Sci. Q. 2000, 45:425-455.
2. Allison P.D. Missing Data 2001, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks.
3. Alter C., Hage J. Organizations Working Together 1993, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
4. Anderson R.M. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1995, 36:1-10.
5. Blakely T., Woodward A.J. Ecological effects in multi-level studies. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 2000, 54:367-374.
6. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Freeman L.C. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis 2002, Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA.
7. Burt R.S. The network structure of social capital. Research Organisational Behavoir 2000, JAI Press, Greenwich. R.I. Sutton, B.M. Staw (Eds.).
8. Burt R.S. Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 2004, 110:349-399.
9. Callaghan R.C., Cunningham J.A. Gender differences in detoxification: predictors of completion and re-admission. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2002, 23:399-407.
10. Campbell B.K., Tillotson C.J., Choi D., Bryant K., DiCenzo J., Provost S.E., Zammarelli L., Booth R.E., McCarty D. Predicting outpatient treatment entry following detoxification for injection drug use: the impact of patient and program factors. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2010, 38:S87-S96.
11. Carrier E., McNeely J., Lobach I., Tay S., Gourevitch M.R., Raven M.C. Factors associated with frequent utilization of crisis substance use detoxification services. J. Addict. Dis. 2011, 30:116-122.
12. Carroll C.P., Triplett P.T., Mondimore F.M. The Intensive Treatment Unit: a brief inpatient detoxification facility demonstrating good postdetoxification treatment entry. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2009, 37:111-119.
13. County Alcohol and Drug Program Administrators' Association of California CADPAAC Like Size County Structure 2006, http://cadpaac.org/downloads/like_size_counties.pdf (accessed March 1, 2012).
14. Evans E., Grella C., Murphy D., Hser Y.I. Using administrative data for longitudinal substance abuse research. J. Behav. Health Serv. Res. 2010, 37:252-271.
15. Federman E., Moos R.H., Finney J.W. Risk Adjustment for Substance Abuse Patients: An Accurate Casemix Model Should Include Information Obtained Directly from Patients at Baseline 2000, Center for Health Care Evaluation, Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, CA.
16. Garnick D.W., Lee M.T., Chalk M., Gastfriend D., Horgan C.M., McCorry F., McLellan A.T., Merrick E.L. Establishing the feasibility of performance measures for alcohol and other drugs. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2002, 23:375-385.
17. Garnick D.W., Lee M.T., Horgan C.M., Acevedo A. Adapting Washington Circle performance measures for public sector substance abuse treatment systems. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2009, 36:265-277. Washington Circle Public Sector Workgroup.
18. Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 1973, 78:1360-1380.
19. Hanneman R.A., Riddle M. Introduction to Social Network Methods 2005, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA.
20. Heflinger C.A. Measuring service system coordination in managed mental health care for children and youth. Eval. Program Plann. 1996, 19:155-163.
21. Liebeskind J.P., Oliver A.L., Zucker L., Brewer M. Social networks, learning, and flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Org. Sci. 1996, 7:428-443.
22. Longabaugh R. Monitoring treatment outcomes. Alcohol Health Res. World 1991, 15:189-200.
23. Mark T.L., Vandivort-Warren R., Montejano L.B. Factors affecting detoxification readmission: analysis of public sector data from three states. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2006, 31:439-445.
24. McLellan A.T., Carise D., Kleber H.D. Can the national addiction treatment infrastructure support the public's demand for quality care?. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2003, 25:117-121.
25. McLellan A.T., Luborsky L., Woody G.E., O'Brien C.P. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: the Addiction Severity Index. J. Nerv. Mental Dis. 1980, 168:26-33.
26. McLellan A.T., Weinstein R.L., Shen Q., Kendig C., Levine M. Improving continuity of care in a public addiction treatment system with clinical case management. Am. J. Addict. 2005, 14:426-440.
27. Morrissey J.P., Johnsen M.C., Calloway M.O. Evaluating performance and change in mental health systems serving children and youth: an interorganizational network approach. J. Ment. Health Admin. 1997, 24:4-22.
28. Morrissey J.P., Tausig M., Lindsey M.L. Network Analysis Methods for Mental Health Service System Research 1985, Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health Service, National Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD.
29. Provan K.G., Huang K., Milward H.B. The evolution of structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed health and human services network. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 2009, 19:873-893.
30. Provan K.G., Milward H.B. A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: a comparative study of four community mental health systems. Admin. Sci. Q. 1995, 40:1-33.
31. Provan K.G., Sebastian J.G. Networks within networks: service link overlap, organizational cliques, and network effectiveness. Acad. Manage. 1998, 41:453-463.
32. Rogers D.L., Whetten D.A. Interorganizational Coordination: Theory, Research, Implementation 1982, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
33. Rosenheck R., Morrissey J., Lam J., Calloway M., Stolar M., Johnsen M., Randolph F., Blasinsky M., Goldman H. Service delivery and community: social capital, service systems integration, and outcomes among homeless persons with severe mental illness. Health Serv. Res. 2001, 36:691-710.
34. Saitz R., Larson M.J., LaBelle C., Richardson J., Samet J.H. The case for chronic disease management for addiction. J. Addict. Med. 2008, 2:55-65.
35. Simpson D.D. National treatment system evaluation based on the Drug Abuse Reporting Program (DARP) follow-up research. Drug abuse treatment evaluation: strategies, progress, and prospects. NIDA Res. Monogr. 1984, 51:29-41.
36. Simpson D.D., Sells S.B. Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: an overview of the DARP research program. Adv. Alcohol Subst. Abuse 1982, 2:7-29.
37. StataCorp Stata Statistical Software: Release 11 2009, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX.
38. Thomas J.C., Isler M.R., Carter C., Torrone E. An interagency network perspective on HIV prevention. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2007, 34:71-75.
39. Urada D., Fan J., Rawson R. Data analysis report. Evaluation Services to Enhance the Data Management System in California, 5-25 2010, Prepared for the Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, California Health and Human Services Agency. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Los Angeles, CA.
40. Uzzi B. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1999, 64:481-505.
41. Weisner C., McLellan A.T., Hunkeler E.M. Addiction Severity Index data from general membership and treatment samples of HMO members: one case of norming the ASI. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2000, 19:103-109.
42. Wines J.D., Saitz R., Horton N.J., Lloyd-Travaglini C., Samet J.H. Overdose after detoxification: a prospective study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 89:161-169.