The evolution of structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed health and human services network

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 873-893

  Provan, Keith G ^a   Huang, Kun ^b   Milward, H Brinton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68349141327     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mun036     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aday, Lu Ann. 2001. At risk in America: The health and health care needs of vulnerable populations in the United States. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass
2. Agranoff, Robert. 1991. Human services integration: Past and future challenges in pubic administration. Public Administration Review 51:533-542
3. Agranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. 2003. Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
4. Banaszak-Holl, Jane, Susan Allen, Vincent Mor, and Thomas Schott. 1998. Organizational characteristics associated with agency position in Community Care Networks. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 39:368-383
5. Benjamin, Beth A., and Joel M. Podolny. 1999. Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 44:563-589
6. Bonacich, Phillip. 1987. Power and centrality: A family of measures. The American Journal of Sociology 92:1170-1182
7. Borgatti, Stephen Peter, Martin G. Everett, and Linton C. Freeman. 2002. Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
8. Burkhardt, Marlene E., and Daniel J. Brass. 1990. Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly 35:104-127
9. Carroll, Glenn R. 1985. Concentration and specialization: Dynamics of niche width in population of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 90:1262-1283
10. Chaskin, Robert J., Brown Prudence, Venkatesh Sudhir, and Vidal Avis. 2001. Building community capacity. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
11. Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
12. Collins, Jim. 2005. Good to great and the social sectors. New York: HarperCollins.
13. Cook, Karen S. 1977. Exchange and power in networks of interorganizational relations. Sociological Quarterly 18:62-82.
14. Cook, Karen S., and Richard M. Emerson. 1978. Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review 43:721-739
15. Diani, Mario. 2002. Network analysis. In Methods of social movement research, ed. Bert Klandermans and Suzanne Staggenborg, 173-200. Minneapolis, MN: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
16. Downs, George W., and David M. Rocke. 1979. Interpreting heteroscedasticity. American Journal of Political Science 23:816-828
17. Dyer, Jeffery H., and Wujin Chu. 2003. The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science 14:57-68.
18. Emerson, Richard M. 1962. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review 27:31-41.
19. Ferlie, Ewan, and Andrew Pettigrew. 1996. Managing through networks: Some issues and implications for the NHS. British Journal of Management 7:81-99.
20. Ferlie, Ewan, Chris Hawkins, and Beth Kewell. 2003. Managed networks within cancer services: An organizational perspective. In Managed care networks: Principles and practice, ed. Roger James and Andrew Miles, 1-15. London: Aesculapius Medical Press.
21. Frumpkin, Peter, and David Reingold. 2004. Why programs get replicated. The Nonpro.t Quarterly 11 (3): 46-59.
22. Galaskiewicz, Joseph. 1979. The structure of community organizational networks. Social Forces 57: 1356-1364
23. 1985. Interorganizational relations. Annual Review of Sociology 11:281-304.
24. Graddy, Elizabeth A., and Bin Chen. 2006. In.uences on the size and scope of networks for social service delivery. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16:533-552
25. Granovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic action and social structures: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91:481-510.
26. Gulati, Ranjay. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38:85-112.
27. Gulati, Ranjay, and Martin Gargiulo. 1999. Where do inter-organizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology 104:1439-1493
28. Herranz, Joaquin, Jr. 2008. The multisectoral trilemma of network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18:1-31.
29. Hoffman, Alan N., Timothy M. Stearns, and Charles B. Shrader. 1990. Structure, context and centrality in inter-organizational networks. Journal of Business Research 20:333-347
30. Huang, Kun, and Keith G. Provan. 2007a. Structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed mental health services network. Public Management Review 9:169-189
31. 2007b. Tangibility of resources and patterns of network interaction in a publicly-funded health and human service network. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17:435-454
32. Human, Sherrie E., and Keith G. Provan. 2000. Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-.rm networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly 45:327-365
33. Isett, Kimberley R., and Keith G. Provan. 2005. The evolution of interorganizational network relationships over time: Does sector matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15:149-165
34. Kapucu, Naim. 2005. Interorganizational coordination in dynamic context: Networks in emergency response management. Connections 26:33-48.
35. Lang, Gladys Engel, and Kurt Lang. 1988. Recognition and renown: The survival of artistic reputation. American Journal of Sociology 94:79-109.
36. Laumann, Edward O., Joseph Galaskiewicz, and Peter V. Marsden. 1978. Community structure as interorganizational linkages. Annual Review of Sociology 4:455-484
37. Leichsenring, Kai. 2004. Developing integrated health and social care services for older persons in Europe. International Journal of Integrated Care 4 (e10): 1-18.
38. Marsden, Peter V. 1990. Network data and measurement. In Annual review of sociology, No.16, ed. W. Richard Scott, 435-463 Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.
39. Mayer, Roger C., and James H. Davis. 1999. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A .eld quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 84:123-136
40. Oliver, Amalya L., and Kathleen Montgomery. 1996. A network approach to outpatient service delivery systems: Resource .ow and system in.uence. Health Service Research 30:771-789
41. O'Toole, Laurence J. 1997. Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review 57:45-52.
42. Perrone, Vincenzo, Akbar Zaheer, and Bill McEvily. 2003. Free to be trusted: Organizational constraints on trust in boundary spanners. Organization Science 14:422-439
43. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerald R. Salancik. 1978. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.
44. Podolny, Joel M. 1993. A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology 98:829-872
45. Powell, Walter W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In Research in organizational behavior, vol.3, ed. Barry M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, 295-336. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
46. Powell, Walter W., Douglas R. White, Kenneth W. Koput, and Owen-Smith Jason. 2005. Network dynamics and .eld evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology 110 (4): 1132-1206
47. President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. 2003. Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. www.MentalHealthCommission. gov (accessed July 29, 2008).
48. Provan, Keith G., and H. Brinton Milward. 1995. A preliminary theory of interorganizatinal network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 40:1-33.
49. 2001. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review 61:414-423
50. Provan, Keith G., Janice M. Beyer, and Carlos Kruytbosch. 1980. Environmental linkages and power in resource-dependence relations between organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 25:200-225
51. Provan, Keith G., Kimberley R. Isett, and H. Brinton Milward. 2004. Cooperation and compromise: A network response to con.icting institutional pressures in community mental health. Nonpro.t and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33:489-514.
52. Provan, Keith G., and Patrick Kenis. 2008. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18:229-252
53. Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
54. Rethemeyer, R. Karl. 2005. Conceptualizing and measuring collaborative networks. Public Administration Review 65:117-121
55. Scott, John. 1991. Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.
56. Scott, W. Richard. 2001. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Sherer, Peter D., and Kyungmook Lee. 2002. Institutional change in large law .rms: A resource dependency and institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal 45:102-119
58. Shrum, Wesley, and Robert Wuthnow. 1988. Reputation status of organizations in technical systems. American Journal of Sociology 93:882-912.
59. Snijders, Tom A. B. 2005. Models for longitudinal network data. In Models and methods in social network analysis, ed. Peter J. Carrington, John Scott and Stanley Wasserman, 215-247 New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.
60. Stuart, Toby E., Ha Hoang, and Ralph C. Hybels. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44:315-349
61. Townsley, Ruth, David Abbott, and Debby Watson. 2004. Making a difference: Exploring the impact of multi-agency working on disabled children with complex health care needs, their families and the professionals who support them. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
62. Uzzi, Brian. 1997. Social structure and competition in inter.rm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42:35-67.
63. Wallner, Jennifer. 2008. Legitimacy and public policy: Seeing beyond effectiveness, ef.ciency, and performance. The Policy Studies Journal 36:421-443
64. Wasserman, Stanley, and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social network analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
65. Williamson, Oliver. 1993. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics 36:453-486
66. Wolberg, John. 2006. Data analysis using the method of least squares: Extracting the most information from experiments. New York, NY: Springer.