Differential Effect of Conditioning Sequences in Coupling Inhibitory/Facilitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for PostStroke Motor Recovery

CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 355-363

  Wang, Chih Pin ^a   Tsai, Po Yi ^b,c   Yang, Tsui Fen ^b,c   Yang, Kuang Yao ^b,c   Wang, Chien Chih ^b  

^a MACKAY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Coupling stimulation; Facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Motor recovery; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EXCITABILITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; NEUROMODULATION; PARALLEL DESIGN; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STROKE PATIENT; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION SYSTEM; VERY ELDERLY; COMPLICATION; CONVALESCENCE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HEMIPLEGIA; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR CORTEX; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICAL MODEL; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR CORTEX; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84896048787     PISSN: 17555930     EISSN: 17555949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cns.12221     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol 2004;61:1844-1848.
2. Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:313-319.
3. Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Pasqualetti P, Filippi M, Rossini PM. Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the 'affected' and 'unaffected' hemispheres in human stroke. Brain Res 1998;803:1-8.
4. Cramer SC, Sur M, Dobkin BH, et al. Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain 2011;134:1591-1609.
5. Nair DG, Hutchinson S, Fregni F, Alexander M, Pascual-Leone A, Schlaug G. Imaging correlates of motor recovery from cerebral infarction and their physiological significance in well-recovered patients. Neuroimage 2007;34:253-263.
6. Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala RR, Cramer SC. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain 2008;131:425-437.
7. Tardy J, Pariente J, Leger A, et al. Methylphenidate modulates cerebral post-stroke reorganization. Neuroimage 2006;33:913-922.
8. Khedr EM, Etraby AE, Hemeda M, Nasef AM, Razek AA. Long-term effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2010;121:30-37.
9. Lefaucheur JP. Stroke recovery can be enhanced by using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Neurophysiol Clin 2006;36:105-115.
10. Teo JT, Swayne OB, Cheeran B, Greenwood RJ, Rothwell JC. Human theta burst stimulation enhances subsequent motor learning and increases performance variability. Cereb Cortex 2011;21:1627-1638.
11. Di Lazzaro V, Profice P, Pilato F, et al. Motor cortex plasticity predicts recovery in acute stroke. Cereb Cortex 2010;20:1523-1528.
12. Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Dafotakis M, et al. Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke. Arch Neurol 2008;65:741-747.
13. Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Watanabe I, Ikoma K. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke 2005;36:2681-2686.
14. Platz T, Rothwell JC. Brain stimulation and brain repair-rTMS: from animal experiment to clinical trials-what do we know? Restor Neurol Neurosci 2010;28:387-398.
15. Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005;128:490-499.
16. Celnik P, Paik NJ, Vandermeeren Y, Dimyan M, Cohen LG. Effects of combined peripheral nerve stimulation and brain polarization on performance of a motor sequence task after chronic stroke. Stroke 2009;40:1764-1771.
17. Pomeroy VM, Cloud G, Tallis RC, Donaldson C, Nayak V, Miller S. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and muscle contraction to enhance stroke recovery: a randomized proof-of-principle and feasibility investigation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:509-517.
18. Sung WH, Wang CP, Chou CL, Chen YC, Tsai PY. Efficacy of coupling inhibitory and facilitatory rTMS to enhance motor recovery in hemiplegic stroke patients. Stroke 2013;44:1375-1382.
19. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989;20:864-870.
20. Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther 1966;46:357-375.
21. Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:531-536.
22. Di Lazzaro V, Pilato F, Dileone M, et al. Modulating cortical excitability in acute stroke: a repetitive TMS study. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:715-723.
23. Li Voti P, Conte A, Suppa A, et al. Correlation between cortical plasticity, motor learning and BDNF genotype in healthy subjects. Exp Brain Res 2011;212:91-99.
24. Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005;45:201-206.
25. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13-31.
26. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, et al. The excite trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005;19:194-205.
27. Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A, et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Elctroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;91:79-92.
28. Lee MY, Jang SH. Ipsilateral motor cortex activation by unaffected hand movements in patients with cerebral infarct. NeuroRehabilitation 2011;29:359-364.
29. Luft AR, Waller S, Forrester L, et al. Lesion location alters brain activation in chronically impaired stroke survivors. Neuroimage 2004;21:924-935.
30. Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Wang LE, Dafotakis M, Eickhoff SB, Fink GR. Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 2010;50:233-242.
31. Bestmann S, Swayne O, Blankenburg F, et al. The role of contralesional dorsal premotor cortex after stroke as studied with concurrent TMS-fMRI. J Neurosci 2010;30:11926-11937.
32. Nyffeler T, Wurtz P, Luscher HR, et al. Extending lifetime of plastic changes in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci 2006;24:2961-2966.
33. Ragert P, Camus M, Vandermeeren Y, Dimyan MA, Cohen LG. Modulation of effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation applied over primary motor cortex (M1) by conditioning stimulation of the opposite M1. J Neurophysiol 2009;102:766-773.
34. Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Nair D, Schlaug G. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology 2010;75:2176-2184.
35. Vines BW, Cerruti C, Schlaug G. Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation. BMC Neurosci 2008;9:103.
36. Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS, et al. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rtms of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology 2005;64:1802-1804.
37. Ziemann U. TMS and drugs. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:1717-1729.
38. Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer. Neuron 2007;55:187-199.
39. Liepert J, Gorsler A, van Eimeren T, Munchau A, Weiller C. Motor excitability in a patient with a somatosensory cortex lesion. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114:1003-1008.
40. Hamada M, Murase N, Hasan A, Balaratnam M, Rothwell JC. The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. Cereb Cortex 2013;23:1593-1605.
41. Mally J, Dinya E. Recovery of motor disability and spasticity in post-stroke after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Brain 2008;76:388-395.
42. Newton JM, Ward NS, Parker GJ, et al. Non-invasive mapping of corticofugal fibres from multiple motor areas-relevance to stroke recovery. Brain 2006;129:1844-1858.
43. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WD. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain 2007;130:170-180.
44. Rao SM, Bandettini PA, Binder JR, et al. Relationship between finger movement rate and functional magnetic resonance signal change in human primary motor cortex. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:1250-1254.
45. Lacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M, Bekkering H, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 1999;286:2526-2528.