Comparing three CPR feedback devices and standard BLS in a single rescuer scenario: A randomised simulation study

Resuscitation

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 560-566

  Zapletal, Bernhard ^a   Greif, Robert ^b   Stumpf, Dominik ^c   Nierscher, Franz Josef ^a   Frantal, Sophie ^a   Haugk, Moritz ^a   Ruetzler, Kurt ^a,d   Schlimp, Christoph ^e   Fischer, Henrik ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern Linz   (Austria)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRAUMATOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Basic life support (BLS); Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); Feedback device

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; COMPRESSION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CPR FEEDBACK DEVICE; CPR MANIKIN; DECOMPRESSION; FEMALE; FLOW TIME FRACTION; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESUSCITATION; SIMULATION; THORAX COMPRESSION; YOUNG ADULT; ACCELEROMETRY; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BODY SIZE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEART ARREST; HEART MASSAGE; LONG TERM CARE; PRESSURE; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; BODY SIZE; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HEART ARREST; HEART MASSAGE; HUMANS; LIFE SUPPORT CARE; MALE; MANIKINS; PRESSURE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84895928325     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.10.028     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bobrow B.J., Spaite D.W., Berg R.A., et al. Chest compression-only CPR by lay rescuers and survival from out of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2010, 304:1447-1454.
2. Wik L., Kramer-Johansen J., Myklebust H., et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005, 293:299-304.
3. Olasveengen T.M., Wik L., Steen P.A. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before and during transport in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2008, 76:185-190.
4. Abella B.S., Edelson D.P., Kim S., et al. CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real-time audiovisual feedback system. Resuscitation 2007, 73:54-61.
5. Sugerman N.T., Edelson D.P., Leary M., et al. Rescuer fatigue during actual in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with audiovisual feedback: a prospective multicenter study. Resuscitation 2009, 80:981-984.
6. Fischer H., Gruber J., Neuhold S., et al. Effects and limitations of an AED with audiovisual feedback for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized manikin study. Resuscitation 2011, 82:902-907.
7. Yeung J., Meeks R., Edelson D., et al. The use of CPR feedback/prompt devices during training and CPR performance: a systematic review. Resuscitation 2009, 80:743-751.
8. Noordergraaf G.J., Drinkwaard B.W., van Berkom P.F., et al. The quality of chest compressions by trained personnel: the effect of feedback, via the CPREzy, in a randomized controlled trial using a manikin model. Resuscitation 2006, 69:241-252.
9. Skorning M., Beckers S.K., Brokmann J., et al. New visual feedback device improves performance of chest compressions by professionals in simulated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2009, 81:53-58.
10. Segal N., Laurent F., Maman L., Plaisance P., Augustin P. Accuracy of a feedback device for cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a dental chair. Emerg Med J 2012, 29:890-893.
11. Sopka S., Biermann H., Rossaint R., et al. Evaluation of a newly developed media-supported 4-step approach for basic life support training. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2012, 20:37.
12. Greif R., Egger L., Basciani R.M., Lockey A., Vogt A. Emergency skill training - a randomized controlled study on the effectiveness of the 4-stage approach compared to traditional clinical teaching. Resuscitation 2010, 81:1692-1697.
13. Koster R.W., Baubin M.A., Bossaert L.L., et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation 2010, 81:1277-1292.
14. Fischer H., Neuhold S., Zapletal B., et al. A manually powered mechanical resuscitation device used by a single rescuer: a randomised controlled manikin study. Resuscitation 2011, 82:913-919.
15. Nishisaki A., Nysaether J., Sutton R., et al. Effect of mattress deflection on CPR quality assessment for older children and adolescents. Resuscitation 2009, 80:540-545.
16. Perkins G.D., Kocierz L., Smith S.C., McCulloch R.A., Davies R.P. Compression feedback devices over estimate chest compression depth when performed on a bed. Resuscitation 2009, 80:79-82.
17. Gruber J., Stumpf D., Zapletal B., Neuhold S., Fischer H. Real-time feedback systems in CPR. Trends Anaest Crit Care 2012, 2:287-294.
18. Pozner C.N., Almozlino A., Elmer J., et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback improves the quality of chest compression provided by hospital health care professionals. Am J Emerg Med 2010, 29:618-625.
19. Skorning M., Beckers S.K., Brokmann J., et al. New visual feedback device improves performance of chest compressions by professionals in simulated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2010, 81:53-58.
20. Aufderheide T.P., Pirrallo R.G., Yannopoulos D., et al. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques. Resuscitation 2005, 64:353-362.
21. Greif R., Stumpf D., Neuhold S., et al. Effective compression ratio - a new measurement of the quality of thorax compression during CPR. Resuscitation 2012, 84:672-677.
22. Fallaha J.F., Spooner B.B., Perkins G.D. Does dual operator CPR help minimize interruptions in chest compressions. Resuscitation 2009, 80:1011-1014.
23. Yannopoulos D., McKnite S., Aufderheide T.P., et al. Effects of incomplete chest wall decompression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2005, 64:363-372.
24. Roosa J.R., Vadeboncoeur T.F., Dommer P.B., et al. CPR variability during ground ambulance transport of patients in cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2013, 84:592-595.
25. Kim S.C., Cha H.S., Lee K.C., et al. A simple audio-visual prompt device can improve CPR performance. J Emerg Med 2013, 44:128-134.
26. Kern K.B., Hilwig R.W., Berg R.A., Sanders A.B., Ewy G.A. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation 2002, 105:645-649.
27. Cunningham L.M., Mattu A., O'Connor R.E., Brady W.J. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: the importance of uninterrupted chest compressions in cardiac arrest resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med 2012, 30:1630-1638.