A manually powered mechanical resuscitation device used by a single rescuer: A randomised controlled manikin study

Resuscitation

Volumn 82, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 913-919

  Fischer, Henrik ^a   Neuhold, Stephanie ^a   Zapletal, Bernhard ^a   Hochbrugger, Eva ^a   Koinig, Herbert ^a   Steinlechner, Barbara ^a   Frantal, Sophie ^a   Stumpf, Dominik ^a   Greif, Robert ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); Manikin; Mechanical resuscitation device

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BREATHING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION; HAND; HUMAN; LUNG MINUTE VOLUME; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESUSCITATION; THORAX;

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART ARREST; HUMANS; MALE; MANIKINS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957828109     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.026     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hightower D., Thomas S.H., Stone C.K., Dunn K., March J.A. Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time. Ann Emerg Med 1995, 26:300-303.
2. Wik L., Kramer-Johansen J., Myklebust H., et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005, 293:299-304.
3. Ochoa F.J., Ramalle-Gomara E., Lisa V., Saralegui I. The effect of rescuer fatigue on the quality of chest compressions. Resuscitation 1998, 37:149-152.
4. Gaxiola A., Varon J. Evolution and new perspective of chest compression mechanical devices. Am J Emerg Med 2008, 26:923-931.
5. Wik L., Kiil S. Use of an automatic mechanical chest compression device (LUCAS) as a bridge to establishing cardiopulmonary bypass for a patient with hypothermic cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2005, 66:391-394.
6. Steen S., Liao Q., Pierre L., Paskevicius A., Sjoberg T. Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation 2002, 55:285-299.
7. Duchateau F.X., Gueye P., Curac S., et al. Effect of the AutoPulse automated band chest compression device on hemodynamics in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Intensive Care Med 2010, 36:1256-1260.
8. Steen S., Sjoberg T., Olsson P., Young M. Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation 2005, 67:25-30.
9. Krep H., Mamier M., Breil M., Heister U., Fischer M., Hoeft A. Out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the AutoPulse system: a prospective observational study with a new load-distributing band chest compression device. Resuscitation 2007, 73:86-95.
10. Handley A.J., Koster R., Monsieurs K., Perkins G.D., Davies S., Bossaert L. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation 2005, 67:S7-23.
11. Bullock I. Skill acquisition in resuscitation. Resuscitation 2000, 45:139-143.
12. Nishisaki A., Nysaether J., Sutton R., et al. Effect of mattress deflection on CPR quality assessment for older children and adolescents. Resuscitation 2009, 80:540-545.
13. Perkins G.D., Kocierz L., Smith S.C., McCulloch R.A., Davies R.P. Compression feedback devices over estimate chest compression depth when performed on a bed. Resuscitation 2009, 80:79-82.
14. Kretz F., Schäffer J. Anästhesie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie 2008, Springer Medizin Verlag, Heidelberg.
15. Aufderheide T.P., Pirrallo R.G., Yannopoulos D., et al. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques. Resuscitation 2005, 64:353-362.
16. Boyle A.J., Wilson A.M., Connelly K., McGuigan L., Wilson J., Whitbourn R. Improvement in timing and effectiveness of external cardiac compressions with a new non-invasive device: the CPR-Ezy. Resuscitation 2002, 54:63-67.
17. Kern K.B., Hilwig R.W., Berg R.A., Sanders A.B., Ewy G.A. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation 2002, 105:645-649.
18. Kern K.B., Hilwig R.W., Berg R.A., Ewy G.A. Efficacy of chest compression-only BLS CPR in the presence of an occluded airway. Resuscitation 1998, 39:179-188.
19. Yu T., Weil M.H., Tang W., et al. Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circulation 2002, 106:368-372.
20. Perkins G.D., Stephenson B.T., Smith C.M., Gao F. A comparison between over-the-head and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2004, 61:155-161.
21. Sunde K., Wik L., Naess P.A., Grund F., Nicolaysen G., Steen P.A. Improved haemodynamics with increased compression-decompression rates during ACD-CPR in pigs. Resuscitation 1998, 39:197-205.
22. Abella B.S., Alvarado J.P., Myklebust H., et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005, 293:305-310.
23. Peberdy M.A., Silver A., Ornato J.P. Effect of caregiver gender, age, and feedback prompts on chest compression rate and depth. Resuscitation 2009, 80:1169-1174.
24. Black C.J., Busuttil A., Robertson C. Chest wall injuries following cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2004, 63:339-343.
25. Machii M., Inaba H., Nakae H., Suzuki I., Tanaka H. Cardiac rupture by penetration of fractured sternum: a rare complication of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2000, 43:151-153.
26. Yannopoulos D., McKnite S., Aufderheide T.P., et al. Effects of incomplete chest wall decompression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2005, 64:363-372.
27. Wenzel V., Idris A.H., Banner M.J., Kubilis P.S., Williams J.L. Influence of tidal volume on the distribution of gas between the lungs and stomach in the nonintubated patient receiving positive-pressure ventilation. Crit Care Med 1998, 26:364-368.
28. Berg R.A., Kern K.B., Hilwig R.W., et al. Assisted ventilation does not improve outcome in a porcine model of single-rescuer bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 1997, 95:1635-1641.
29. Idris A.H., Becker L.B., Fuerst R.S., et al. Effect of ventilation on resuscitation in an animal model of cardiac arrest. Circulation 1994, 90:3063-3069.
30. Ewy G.A., Zuercher M., Hilwig R.W., et al. Improved neurological outcome with continuous chest compressions compared with 30:2 compressions-to-ventilations cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a realistic swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2007, 116:2525-2530.
31. Hallstrom A., Cobb L., Johnson E., Copass M. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by chest compression alone or with mouth-to-mouth ventilation. N Engl J Med 2000, 342:1546-1553.
32. SOS-KANTO. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders with chest compression only (SOS-KANTO): an observational study. Lancet 2007;369:920-6.
33. Rea T.D., Fahrenbruch C., Culley L., Donohoe R.C.C.H. CPR with chest compression alone or with rescue breathing. N Engl J Med 2010, 363:423-433.
34. Svensson L., Bohm K., Castrèn M. Compression-only CPR or standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2010, 363:434-442.