New insights into enzymatic hydrolysis of heterogeneous cellulose by using carbohydrate-binding module 3 containing GFP and carbohydrate-binding module 17 containing CFP

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Gao, Shuhong ^a,b   You, Chun ^b   Renneckar, Scott ^b   Bao, Jie ^a   Zhang, Yi Heng Percival ^b,c,d  

^a EAST CHINA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Cell Free Bioinnovations Inc   (United States)

^d Gate Fuels Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Amorphous cellulose; Carbohydrate binding module; Crystalline cellulose; Enzymatic hydrolysis of heterogeneous cellulose; Mono cherry fluorescent protein

Indexed keywords

AMORPHOUS MATERIALS; CARBOHYDRATES; CELLULOSE; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; FLUORESCENCE; PROBES; PROTEINS; SURFACES;

AMORPHOUS CELLULOSE; BIOMASS PRE TREATMENTS; CARBOHYDRATE-BINDING MODULES; CRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; IN-DEPTH UNDERSTANDING; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE (AVICEL);

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

AMORPHOUS MEDIUM; CARBOHYDRATE; CELLULOSE; CHEMICAL BINDING; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HYDROLYSIS; PROTEIN;

EID: 84895925465     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-24     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Next generation biorefineries will solve the food, biofuels, and environmental trilemma in the energy-food-water nexus. Zhang Y-HP, Energy Sci Eng 2013 1 27 41 10.1002/ese3.2
2. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002 66 506 577 10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002 12209002
3. How does plant cell wall nanoscale architecture correlate with enzymatic digestibility? Ding S-Y, Liu Y-S, Zeng Y, Himmel ME, Baker JO, Bayer EA, Science 2012 338 6110 1055 1060 10.1126/science.1227491 23180856
4. Substrates and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Mansfield SD, Mooney C, Saddler JN, Biotechnol Prog 1999 15 804 816 10.1021/bp9900864 10514250
5. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Zhang Y-HP, Lynd LR, Biotechnol Bioeng 2004 88 797 824 10.1002/bit.20282 15538721
6. Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: a comparison of cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia. Rollin JA, Zhu Z, Sathisuksanoh N, Zhang Y-HP, Biotechnol Bioeng 2011 108 1 22 30 10.1002/bit.22919 20812260
7. Evaluations of cellulose accessibilities of lignocelluloses by solute exclusion and protein adsorption techniques. Wang QQ, He Z, Zhu Z, Zhang Y-HP, Ni Y, Luo XL, Zhu JY, Biotechnol Bioeng 2012 109 381 389 10.1002/bit.23330 21915856
8. Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a nonhydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. Hong J, Ye X, Zhang Y-HP, Langmuir 2007 23 25 12535 12540 10.1021/la7025686 17988165
9. Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: the role of amorphogenesis. Arantes V, Saddler J, Biotechnol Biofuels 2010 3 4 10.1186/1754-6834-3-4 20178562
10. Cellulose solvent-based biomass pretreatment breaks highly ordered hydrogen bonds in cellulose fibers of switchgrass. Sathitsuksanoh N, Zhu ZG, Wi S, Zhang Y-HP, Biotechnol Bioeng 2011 108 521 529 10.1002/bit.22964 20967803
11. Family 17 and 28 carbohydrate-binding modules discriminated different cell-wall sites in sweet potato roots. Araki Y, Karita S, Tsuchiya T, Kondo M, Goto M, Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2010 74 4 802 805 10.1271/bbb.90845 20378993
12. Versatile derivatives of carbohydrate-binding modules for imaging of complex carbohydrates approaching the molecular level of resolution. Ding SY, Xu Q, Ali MK, Baker JO, Bayer EA, Barak Y, Lamed R, Sugiyama J, Rumbles G, Himmel ME, Biotechniques 2006 41 4 435 440 10.2144/000112244 17068959
13. A functionally-based model for hydrolysis of cellulose by fungal cellulase. Zhang Y-HP, Lynd LR, Biotechnol Bioeng 2006 94 888 898 10.1002/bit.20906 16685742
14. A mechanistic model for rational design of optimal cellulase mixtures. Levine SE, Fox JM, Clark DS, Blanch HW, Biotechnol Bioeng 2011 108 11 2561 2570 10.1002/bit.23249 21702033
15. Carbohydrate-binding domains: multiplicity of biological roles. Guillén D, Sánchez S, Rodríguez-Sanoja R, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010 85 5 1241 1249 10.1007/s00253-009-2331-y 19908036
16. Recognition of cello-oligosaccharides by a family 17 carbohydrate-binding module: an X-ray crystallographic, thermodynamic and mutagenic study. Notenboom V, Boraston AB, Chiu P, Freelove AC, Kilburn DG, Rose DR, J Mol Biol 2001 314 797 806 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5153 11733998
17. Specificity and affinity of substrate binding by a family 17 carbohydrate-binding module from Clostridium cellulovorans cellulase 5A. Boraston AB, Chiu P, Warren RAJ, Kilburn DG, Biochemistry 2000 39 36 11129 11136 10.1021/bi0007728 10998252
18. Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ, Biochem J 2004 382 3 769 781 10.1042/BJ20040892 15214846
19. Fusion of a family 9 cellulose-binding module improves catalytic potential of Clostridium thermocellum cellodextrin phosphorylase on insoluble cellulose. Ye X, Zhu Z, Zhang C, Zhang Y-HP, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011 92 551 560 10.1007/s00253-011-3346-8 21630044
20. A minimal set of bacterial cellulases for consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose. Liao HH, Zhang XZ, Rollin JA, Zhang Y-HP, Biotechnol J 2011 6 11 1409 1418 10.1002/biot.201100157 21751395
21. Mini-scaffoldin enhanced mini-cellulosome hydrolysis performance on low-accessibility cellulose (Avicel) more than on high-accessibility amorphous cellulose. You C, Zhang X-Z, Zhang YHP, Biochem Eng J 2012 63 57 65
22. Dissecting and reconstructing synergism: in situ visualization of cooperativity among cellulases. Ganner T, Bubner P, Eibinger M, Mayrhofer C, Plank H, Nidetzky B, J Biol Chem 2012 287 52 43215 43222 10.1074/jbc.M112.419952 23118223
23. Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on the morphology and fine structure of pretreated cellulosic residues. Ramos LP, Nazhad MM, Saddler JN, Enzyme Microb Technol 1994 15 821 831
24. Determination of the number-average degree of polymerization of cellodextrins and cellulose with application to enzymatic hydrolysis. Zhang Y-HP, Lynd LR, Biomacromolecules 2005 6 1510 1515 10.1021/bm049235j 15877372
25. Evaluation of the factors affecting avicel reactivity using multi-stage enzymatic hydrolysis. Yu Z, Jameel H, Chang H-M, Philips R, Park S, Biotechnol Bioeng 2012 109 1131 1139 10.1002/bit.24386 22125215
26. Kinetic study of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose by cellulase from Trichoderma viride. Ohmine K, Ooshima H, Harano Y, Biotechnol Bioeng 1983 25 2041 2053 10.1002/bit.260250813 18551549
27. Changes of structure and morphology of regenerated cellulose caused by acid and enzymatic hydrolysis. Lenze J, Esterbauer H, Sattler W, Schurz J, Wrentschur E, J Appl Polym Sci 1990 41 1315 1326 10.1002/app.1990.070410538
28. The degradation pattern of cellulose by extracellular cellulases of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Puls J, Wood TM, Biores Technol 1991 36 15 19 10.1016/0960-8524(91)90096-3
29. Labeling the planar face of crystalline cellulose using quantum dots directed by type-I carbohydrate-binding modules. Xu Q, Tucker M, Arenkiel P, Ai X, Rumbles G, Sugiyama J, Himmel M, Ding S-Y, Cellulose 2009 16 1 19 26 10.1007/s10570-008-9234-4
30. A mechanistic model of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Levine SE, Fox JM, Blanch HW, Clark DS, Biotechnol Bioeng 2010 10 37 51
31. Enhanced microbial cellulose utilization of recalcitrant cellulose by an ex vivo cellulosome-microbe complex. You C, Zhang X-Z, Sathitsuksanoh N, Lynd LR, Zhang Y-HP, Appl Environ Microbiol 2012 78 5 1437 1444 10.1128/AEM.07138-11 22210210
32. Crystallinity of cellulose, as determined by CP/MAS NMR and XRD methods. Teeäär R, Serimaa R, Paakkarl T, Polym Bull 1987 17 3 231 237
33. Estimation of the lateral dimensions of cellulose crystallites using 13C NMR signal strengths. Newman R, Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 1999 15 1 21 29 10.1016/S0926-2040(99)00043-0 10903081
34. Measuring the crystallinity index of cellulose by solid state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. Park S, Johnson D, Ishizawa C, Parilla P, Davis M, Cellulose 2009 16 4 641 647 10.1007/s10570-009-9321-1
35. FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide. Oh S, Yoo D, Shin Y, Seo G, Carbohydr Res 2005 340 3 417 428 10.1016/j.carres.2004.11.027 15680597
36. The initial kinetics of hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolases I and II is consistent with a cellulose surface-erosion model. Valjamae P, Sild V, Pettersson G, Johansson G, Eur J Biochem 1998 253 469 475 10.1046/j.1432-1327. 1998.2530469.x 9654098
37. Kinetics of solka floc cellulose hydrolysis by Trichoderma viride cellulase. Howell JA, Stuck JD, Biotechnol Bioeng 1975 17 873 893 10.1002/bit.260170608
38. Kinetic studies of enzymatic hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose: analysis of the initial rates. Lee Y-H, Fan LT, Biotechnol Bioeng 1982 24 2383 2406 10.1002/bit.260241107 18546212
39. A transition from cellulose swelling to cellulose dissolution by o-phosphoric acid: evidence from enzymatic hydrolysis and supramolecular structure. Zhang Y-HP, Cui J, Lynd LR, Kuang LR, Biomacromolecules 2006 7 2 644 648 10.1021/bm050799c 16471942
40. Simple Cloning via direct transformation of PCR product (DNA multimer) to Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. You C, Zhang X-Z, Zhang Y-HP, Appl Environ Microbiol 2012 78 1593 1595 10.1128/AEM.07105-11 22194286
41. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol regent. Lowry O, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ, J Biol Chem 1951 193 265 275 14907713