Socioecological and message framing factors influencing maternal influenza immunization among minority women

Vaccine

Volumn 32, Issue 15, 2014, Pages 1736-1744

  Frew, Paula M ^a,b   Saint Victor, Diane S ^a,b   Owens, Lauren E ^a,b   Omer, Saad B ^b  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Immunization coverage; Influenza vaccination; Message framing; Pregnant women; Prospect theory; Racial ethnic minorities; Socioecological model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMMUNITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; IMMUNIZATION; INFLUENZA VACCINATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MATERNAL CARE; MESSAGE FRAMING; MIDDLE AGED; MINORITY GROUP; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM; PUERPERIUM; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEASONAL INFLUENZA; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIOECOLOGICAL FACTOR; SOCIOECOLOGICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

IMMUNIZATION COVERAGE; INFLUENZA VACCINATION; MESSAGE FRAMING; PREGNANT WOMEN; PROSPECT THEORY; RACIAL/ETHNIC MINORITIES; SOCIOECOLOGICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; GEORGIA; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFLUENZA VACCINES; INFLUENZA, HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MIDDLE AGED; MINORITY GROUPS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; VACCINATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84895876076     PISSN: 0264410X     EISSN: 18732518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.030     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Beigi R.H., et al. Economic value of seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis 2009, 49(12):1784-1792.
2. Moro P.L., et al. Safety of seasonal influenza and influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccines in pregnancy. Expert Rev Vaccines 2012, 11(8):911-921.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Maternal and infant outcomes among severely ill pregnant and postpartum women with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1)-United States April 2009-August 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011, 60(35):1193-1196.
4. Georgia Department of Health Annual vaccine preventable diseases surveillance report-Georgia, 2010 2010 October, Available from: http://health.state.ga.us/pdfs/epi/vpd/2010%20VPD%20Report.pdf.
5. Louie J.K., et al. Severe 2009 H1N1 influenza in pregnant and postpartum women in California. N Engl J Med 2010, 362(1):27-35.
6. Ahluwalia I.B., et al. Seasonal influenza vaccine coverage among pregnant women: pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system. J Women's Health 2011, 20(5):649-651.
7. Fiscella K., et al. Disparities in health care by race ethnicity, and language among the insured: findings from a national sample. Med Care 2002, 40(1):52-59.
8. Neuzil K.M., et al. Impact of influenza on acute cardiopulmonary hospitalizations in pregnant women. Am J Epidemiol 1998, 148(11):1094-1102.
9. Read J.S., Riley L. Progress in overcoming barriers to influenza immunization of pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012, 207(Suppl 3):S1-S2.
10. Flowers L. Racial and ethnic disparities in influenza and pneumococcal immunization rates among Medicare beneficiaries. Issue Brief (Public Policy Inst (Am Assoc Retired Pers)) 2007, IB83:1-6.
11. Logan J.L. Disparities in influenza immunization among US adults. J Nat Med Assoc 2009, 101(2):161-166.
12. Frew P.M., et al. Acceptance of pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) vaccine in a minority population: determinants and potential points of intervention. Pediatrics 2011, 127(Suppl 1):S113-S119.
13. Langlie J.K. Social networks, health beliefs, and preventive health behavior. J Health Soc Behav 1977, 18(3):244-260.
14. Shui I., et al. Factors influencing African-American mothers' concerns about immunization safety: a summary of focus group findings. J Nat Med Assoc 2005, 97(5):657-666.
15. Ferguson E., Gallagher L. Message framing with respect to decisions about vaccination: the roles of frame valence, frame method and perceived risk. Br J Psychol 2007, 98(Pt 4):667-680.
16. Bartels R.D., Kelly K.M., Rothman A.J. Moving beyond the function of the health behaviour: the effect of message frame on behavioural decision-making. Psychol Health 2010, 25(7):821-838.
17. Satia J.A., et al. Qualitative study to explore Prospect Theory and message framing and diet and cancer prevention-related issues among African American adolescents. Cancer Nurs 2010, 33(2):102-109.
18. Tversky A., Kahneman D., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertainty 1992, 5:297-323.
19. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211:4481-4538.
20. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory-analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47(2):263-291.
21. Abhyankar P., O'Connor D.B., Lawton R. The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychol Health Med 2008, 13(1):1-16.
22. Gallagher K.M., Updegraff J.A. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med 2012, 43(1):101-116.
23. Jung M.E., et al. Increasing calcium intake in young women through gain-framed, targeted messages: a randomised controlled trial. Psychol Health 2011, 26(5):531-547.
24. Gallagher K.M., et al. Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Health Psychol 2011, 30(2):145-152.
25. Hull S.J. Perceived risk as a moderator of the effectiveness of framed HIV-test promotion messages among women: a randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol 2012, 31(1):114-121.
26. Evangeli M., et al. Does message framing predict willingness to participate in a hypothetical HIV vaccine trial: an application of Prospect Theory. AIDS Care 2013, 25(7):910-914.
27. McCaul K.D., Johnson R.J., Rothman A.J. The effects of framing and action instructions on whether older adults obtain flu shots. Health Psychol 2002, 21(6):624-628.
28. Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological models of human development. International encyclopedia of education 1994, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
29. Snyder L.B. Health communication campaigns and their impact on behavior. J Nutr Educ Behav 2007, 39(2 Suppl):S32-S40.
30. Snyder L.B., et al. A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behavior change in the United States. J Health Commun 2004, 9(Suppl 1):71-96.
31. National Cancer Institute Making health communication programs work 1989, National Cancer Institute, Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/cancerlibrary/pinkbook/page1.
32. Davis T.C., et al. Reading ability of parents compared with reading level of pediatric patient education materials. Pediatrics 1994, 93(3):460-468.
33. Miller B., Bodie M. Determination of reading comprehension level for effective patient health-education materials. Nurs Res 1994, 43(2):118-119.
34. Meyers L.S., Gamst G., Guarino A.J. Applied multivariate research: design and interpretation 2006, 722. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
35. Steinhoff M.C., et al. Influenza immunization in pregnancy-antibody responses in mothers and infants. N Engl J Med 2010, 362(17):1644-1646.
36. Tamma P.D., et al. Safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009, 201(6):547-552.
37. Vannice K.S., et al. Attitudes and beliefs of parents concerned about vaccines: impact of timing of immunization information. Pediatrics 2011, 127(Suppl 1):S120-S126.
38. Gallagher K.M., Updegraff J.A. Erratum to: health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behaviors: a meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med 2013, 46(1):p127.
39. Gerend M., Shepherd M. Message framing it does a body good: effects of message framing and motivational orientation on young women's calcium consumption. J Health Psychol 2012.
40. Llupià A., Olivé M.G., Quesada V., Aldea S., Sequera M., Ríos V.G., García-Basteiro J., Varela A.L., Bayas P., Trilla J.M.A. Evaluating influenza vaccination campaigns beyond coverage: a before-after study among health care workers. Am J Infect Control 2013, 41(8):674-678.
41. Stockwell M.S., Fiks A. Utilizing health information technology to improve vaccine communication and coverage. Hum Vaccines Immunother 2013, 9(8):1802-1811. 10.4161/hv.25031.
42. Bartick M., et al. Closing the quality gap: promoting evidence-based breastfeeding care in the hospital. Pediatrics 2009, 124(4):pe793-pe802.
43. Williams H.C., Smith D., du Vivier A.W. Evaluation of public education campaigns in cutaneous melanoma: the King's College Hospital experience. Br J Dermatol 1990, 123(1):85-92.
44. Link-Gelles R., et al. Missed opportunities: a national survey of obstetricians about attitudes on maternal and infant immunization. Matern Child Health J 2012, 16(9):1743-1747.
45. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 2004, 31(2):143-164.
46. Berkowitz A.D. Applications of social norms theory to other health and social justice issues. The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: a handbook for educators, counselors, clinicians 2002, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA/Trumansburg, NY.
47. de Visser R., Parikh W.L., Lawrie C.A. The importance of social norms for uptake of catch-up human papillomavirus vaccination in young women. Sex Health 2011, 8(3):330-337.
48. Berkowitz A.D. The social norms approach: theory, research, and annotated bibliography 2004, 14886-15701. Trumansburg, NY, http://www.cdc.gov/flu/pastseasons/1112season.htm.
49. I Kawachi, B.P.K., and R Glass, Social capital and self-rated health: a contextual analysis. American Journal of Public Health. 89(8): p. 1187-1193.
50. 2011-2012 Influenza Season: Questions and Answers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. Last updated November 22, 2013. Accessed December 18, 2013. URL: http://cdc.gov/flu/pastseasons/1112season.htm.