Membrane fractionation of a β-lactoglobulin tryptic digest: Effect of the membrane characteristics

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 508-515

  Fernández, Ayoa ^a   Zhu, Yishen ^b   Fitzgerald, Richard J ^b   Riera, Francisco A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Bioactive peptides; Peptide fractionation; Tryptic hydrolysate; Ultrafiltration nanofiltration; Whey proteins; lactoglobulin

Indexed keywords

HYDROPHILICITY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PEPTIDES;

BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES; BIOACTIVE PEPTIDES; HYDROPHILIC/HYDROPHOBIC; LACTOGLOBULIN; MEMBRANE CHARACTERISTICS; MEMBRANE SEPARATION TECHNOLOGY; TRYPTIC HYDROLYSATE; WHEY PROTEINS;

MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY;

BETA LACTOGLOBULIN; FORMIC ACID; PEPTIDE; TRIFLUOROACETIC ACID;

ARTICLE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; HYDROLYSIS; MEMBRANE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; OXIDATION; PH; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER PERMEABILITY;

EID: 84895865443     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4144     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Madureira AR, Tavares T, Gomes AMP, Pintado ME and Malcata FX, Invited review: physiological properties of bioactive peptides obtained from whey proteins. J Dairy Sci 93:437-455 (2010).
2. Mullally MM, Meisel H and FitzGerald RJ, Identification of a novel angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptide corresponding to a tryptic fragment of bovine β-lactoglobulin. FEBS Lett 402:99-101 (1997).
3. Pihlanto-Leppälä A, Koskinen P, Pilola K, Tupasela T and Korhonen H, Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitory properties of whey protein digest: concentration and characterization of active peptides. J Dairy Res 67:53-64 (2000).
4. Pellegrini A, Dettling C, Thomas U and Hunziker P, Isolation and characterization of four bactericidal domains in the bovine β-lactoglobulin, Biochim Biophys Acta 1526:131-140 (2001).
5. Nagaoka S, Futamura Y, Miwa K, Awano T, Yamauchi K, Kanamaru Y, Tadashi K and Kuwata T, Identification of novel Hypocholesterolemic peptides derived from bovine milk β-lactoglobulin, Biochem Biophys Res Co 281:11-17 (2001).
6. Korhonen H and Pihlanto A, Bioactive peptides: production and functionality. Int Dairy J 16:945-960 (2006).
7. Muro C, Álvarez R, Riera F, Arana A and Téllez A, Review: production and functionality of active peptides from milk. Food Sci Technol Int 17:293-317 (2011).
8. Nau F, Kerhervé FL, Léonil J, Daufin G and Aimar P, Separation of beta-casein peptides through UF inorganic membranes. Bioseparation 3:205-215 (1993).
9. Garem A, Daufin G, Maubois JL, Chaufer B and Léonil J, Ionic interactions in nanofiltration of β-casein peptides, Biotechnol Bioeng 57:109-116 (1998).
10. Tessier B, Harscoat-Schiavo C and Marc I, Contribution of electrostatic interactions during fractionation of small peptides complex mixtures by UF/NF membranes. Desalination 200:333-343 (2006).
11. Lapointe JF, Gauthier SF, Pouliot Y and Bouchard C, Effect of hydrodynamic conditions on fractionation of β-lactoglobulin tryptic peptides using nanofiltration membranes. J Membrane Sci 212:55-67 (2003).
12. Groleau PE, Morin P, Gauthier SF and Pouliot Y, Effect of physicochemical conditions on peptide-peptide interactions in a tryptic hydrolysate of β-lactoglobulin and identification of aggregating peptides. J Agric Food Chem 51:4370-4375 (2003).
13. Lapointe JF, Gauthier SF, Pouliot Y and Bouchard C, Fouling of a nanofiltration membrane by a β-lactoglobulin tryptic hydrolysate: impact on the membrane sieving and electrostatic properties. J Membrane Sci 253:89-102 (2005).
14. Pouliot Y, Wijers MC, Gauthier SF and Nadeau L, Fractionation of whey hydrolysates using charged UF/NF membranes. J Membrane Sci 158:105-114 (1999).
15. Fernández A, Suárez A, Zhu Y, FitzGerald RJ and Riera FA, Fractionation of a β-lactoglobulin tryptic digest: effect of the pH. J Food Eng 114:83-89 (2013).
16. Van der Bruggen B, Mänttäri M and Nyström M, Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review. Sep Purif Technol 63:251-263 (2008).
17. Adler-Nissen J, Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Food Proteins. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London (1986).
18. Zeman L and Wales M, Steric rejection of polymeric solutes by membrane with uniform pore sizes distribution. Sep Sci Technol 16:275-290 (1981).
19. Bigelow CC, On the average hydrophobicity of proteins and the relation between it and protein structure. J Theor Biol 16:187-211 (1967).
20. Zhu Y-S and FitzGerald RJ, Direct nano HPLC-ESI-QTOF MS/MS analysis of tryptic caseinophosphopeptides. Food Chem 123:753-759 (2010).
21. Susanto H and Ulbricht M, Influence of ultrafiltration membrane characteristics on adsorptive fouling with dextrans. J Membrane Sci 266:132-142 (2005).
22. Verliefde ARD, Cornelissen ER, Heijman SGJ, Verberk JQJC, Amy GL, Van der Bruggen B and van Dijk JC, The role of electrostatic interactions on the rejection of organic solutes in aqueous solutions with nanofiltration. J Membrane Sci 322:52-66 (2008).
23. Ferry JD, Ultrafilter and ultrafiltration. Chem Rev 11:376-455 (1936).