Acceptability and reliability of multiple mini interviews for admission to otolaryngology residency

Laryngoscope

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 91-96

  Campagna Vaillancourt, Maude ^a   Manoukian, John ^a   Razack, Saleem ^a   Nguyen, Lily H P ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Medical education; multiple mini interview; otolaryngology; residency

Indexed keywords

AGE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CULTURAL BIAS; FEMALE; GENDER BIAS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; LIKERT SCALE; MALE; MULTIPLE MINI INTERVIEW; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; STRENGTH; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESIDENCY; PROCEDURES;

MEDICAL EDUCATION; MULTIPLE MINI INTERVIEW; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; RESIDENCY;

HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; PERSONNEL SELECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCHOOL ADMISSION CRITERIA;

EID: 84895841134     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24122     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Frank JR, ed. The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework. Better Standards. Better Physicians. Better Care. Ottawa, Canada: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2005.
2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/. Accessed August 1, 2012.
3. Salvatori P,. Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2001; 6: 159-175.
4. Basco WT, Gilbert GE, Chessman AW, Blue AV,. The ability of a medical school admission process to predict clinical performance and patients' satisfaction. Acad Med 2000; 75: 743-747.
5. Kulatunga-Moruzi C, Norman GR,. Validity of admissions measures in predicting performance outcomes: the contribution of cognitive and non-cognitive dimensions. Teach Learn Med 2002; 14: 34-42.
6. Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Reiter HI, Norman GR,. An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview. Med Educ 2004; 38: 314-326.
7. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR,. The ability of the multiple mini-interview to predict preclerkship performance in medical school. Acad Med 2004; 79 (suppl): S40-S42.
8. Reiter HI, Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR,. Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Med Educ 2007; 41: 378-384.
9. Lemay J-F, Lockyer JM, Collin VT, Brownell AKW,. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview. Med Educ 2007; 41: 573-579.
10. Kumar K, Roberts C, Rothnie I, du Fresne C, Walton M,. Experiences of the multiple mini-interview: a qualitative analysis. Med Educ 2009; 43: 360-367.
11. Brownell K, Lockyer J, Collin T, Lemay J-F,. Introduction of the multiple mini-interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility. Med Teach 2007; 29: 394-396.
12. Roberts C, Walton M, Rothnie I, Crossley J, Lyon P, Kumar K, Tiller D,. Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school. Med Educ 2008; 42: 396-404.
13. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR,. The relationship between interviewer characteristics and ratings assigned during a multiple mini-interview. Acad Med 2004; 79: 602-609.
14. Hofmeister M, Lockyer J, Crutcher R,. The acceptability of the multiple mini interview for resident selection. Fam Med 2008; 40: 734-740.
15. Finlayson HC, Townson AF,. Resident selection for a physical medicine and rehabilitation program: feasibility and reliability of the multiple mini-interview. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 90: 330-335.
16. Humphrey S, Dowson S, Wall D, Diwakar V, Goodyear HM,. Multiple mini-interviews: opinions of candidates and interviewers. Med Educ 2008; 42: 207-213.
17. Dore KL, Kreuger S, Ladhani M, et al. The reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview as a selection instrument for postgraduate admissions. Acad Med 2010; 85 (suppl): S60-S63.
18. Razack S, Faremo S, Drolet F, Snell L, Wiseman J, Pickering J,. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison. Med Educ 2009; 43: 993-1000.
19. Harris S, Owen C,. Discerning quality: using the multiple mini-interview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School. Med Educ 2007; 41: 234-241.