Resident selection for a physical medicine and rehabilitation program: Feasibility and reliability of the multiple mini-interview

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 330-335

  Finlayson, Heather C ^a,b   Townson, Andrea F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Strong Rehab Centre   (Canada)

Author keywords

Education; Interviews as Topic; Physical Medicine; Residency

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL EDUCATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCHOOL ADMISSION CRITERIA;

EID: 79952932359     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31820f9677     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Green M, Jones P, Thomas JX: Selection criteria for residency: results of a national program directors survey. Acad Med 2009;84:362-7
2. Frank JR: The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework. Better Standards. Better Physicians. Better Care. Ottawa, Canada: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2005
3. ACGME Outcome Project. Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), 2000-2010. Cited November 20, 2010. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/General CompetenciesStandards21307.pdf. Accessed November 20, 2010
4. Eva KW, Rosenfeld JM, Reiter HI, et al: An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview. Med Educ 2004;38:314-26 (Pubitemid 38375760)
5. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld JM, et al: The ability of the multiple mini-interview to predict preclerkship performance in medical school. Acad Med 2004;79: S40-2 (Pubitemid 39281212)
6. Rosenfeld JM, Reiter HI, Trinh K, et al: A cost-efficiency comparison between the Multiple-Mini Interview and traditional admissions interviews. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008;13:43-58
7. Brownell K, Lockyer J, Collin T, et al: Introduction of the Multiple Mini Interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility. Med Teach 2007;29:394-6 (Pubitemid 47386755)
8. Bandiera G, Regehr G: Reliability of a structured interview scoring instrument for a Canadian postgraduate emergency medicine training program. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:27-32 (Pubitemid 38055783)
9. Hamel P, Boisoly H, Corriveau C, et al: Using the CanMEDS roles when interviewing for an ophthalmology residency program. Can J Ophthalmol 2007;42:299-304 (Pubitemid 46713687)
10. Roberts C, Walton M, Rothnie I, et al: Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school. Med Educ 2008;42:396-404 (Pubitemid 351388742)
11. Gordon MJ, Lincoln JA: Family practice resident selection: value of the interview. J Fam Pract 1976;3:175-7
12. Dawkins K, Ekstrom RD, Maltbie A: The relationship between psychiatry residency applicant evaluations and subsequent residency performance. Acad Psychiatry 2005;29:69-75 (Pubitemid 40300213)
13. Komives E, Weiss ST, Rosa RM: The applicant interview as a predictor of resident performance. J Med Educ 1984;59:425-6 (Pubitemid 14146525)