Climate change effects on agriculture: Economic responses to biophysical shocks

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 3274-3279

  Nelson, Gerald C ^a   Valin, Hugo ^b   Sands, Ronald D ^c   Havlík, Petr ^b   Ahammad, Helal ^d   Deryng, Delphine ^e   Elliott, Joshua ^f,g   Fujimori, Shinichiro ^h   Hasegawa, Tomoko ^h   Heyhoe, Edwina ^d   Kyle, Page ⁱ   Von Lampe, Martin ^j   Lotze Campen, Hermann ^k   Mason D'Croz, Daniel ^a   Van Meijl, Hans ^l   Van Der Mensbrugghe, Dominique ^m   Müller, Christoph ^k   Popp, Alexander ^k   Robertson, Richard ^a   Robinson, Sherman ^a   Schmid, Erwin ⁿ   Schmitz, Christoph ^k   Tabeau, Andrzej ^l   Willenbockel, Dirk ^o   more..

^a INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

^c ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^d NATIONAL HEALTH AND MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^g NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies   (United States)

^h NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

ⁱ PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^j OECD   (France)

^k POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^l WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^m FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS   (Italy)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^o UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Agricultural productivity; Climate change adaptation; Integrated assessment; Model intercomparison

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ADAPTATION; AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BIOPHYSICS; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FERTILIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATIVE FORCING;

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY; CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; MODEL INTERCOMPARISON;

AGRICULTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMERCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MODELS, ECONOMIC;

EID: 84895823713     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222465110     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Tobey J, Reilly J, Kane S (1992) Economic implications of global climate change for world agriculture. J Agric Resour Econ 17(1):195-204.
2. Reilly J, Hohmann N (1993) Climate change and agriculture: The role of international trade. Am Econ Rev 83(2):306-312.
3. Rosenzweig C, Parry ML (1994) Potential impact of climate change on world food supply. Nature 367:133-138.
4. Fischer G, Shah MN, Tubiello F, van Velhuizen H (2005) Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: An integrated assessment, 1990-2080. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360(1463):2067-2083.
5. Nelson GC, et al. (2010) Food Security, Farming, and Climate Change to 2050: Scenarios, Results, Policy Options (International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC).
6. Easterling WE, et al. (2007) eds Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp 272-313.
7. Rosenzweig C, et al. (2012) The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and pilot studies. Agric For Meteorol 170:166-182.
8. Rosenzweig C, et al. (2014) Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3268-3273.
9. Armington PS (1969) A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers 16(1):159-176.
10. Hertel T, ed (1997) Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications (Cambridge Univ Press, New York).
11. Villoria NB, Hertel TW (2011) Geography matters: International trade patterns and the indirect land use effects of biofuels. Am J Agric Econ 93(4):919-935.
12. Hertel TW, Hummels D, Ivanic M, Keeney R (2007) How confident can we be of CGEbased assessments of free trade agreements? Econ Model 24(4):611-635.
13. Van Meijl H, van Rheenen T, Tabeau A, Eickhout B (2006) The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114(1): 21-38.
14. Havlík P, et al. (2011) Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets. Energy Policy 39(1):5690-5702.
15. Dietrich JP, Schmitz C, Lotze-Campen H, Popp A, Müller C (2013) Forecasting technological change in agriculture-an endogenous implementation in a global land use model. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013. 02.003.
16. Knutti R (2010) The end of model democracy? Clim Change 102(3-4):395-404.
17. Jones CD, et al. (2011) The HadGEM2-ES implementation of CMIP5 centennial simulations. Geosci Model Dev 4(3):543-570.
18. Dufresne JL, et al. (2013) Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: From CMIP3 to CMIP5. Clim Dynam 40(9-10):2123-2165.
19. Moss RH, et al. (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747-56.
20. Hempel S, Frieler K, Warszawski L, Schewe J, Piontek F (2013) A trend-preserving bias correction-the ISI-MIP approach. Earth Syst Dynam Discuss 4(1):49-92.
21. Van Vuuren DP, Kok MTJ, Girod B, Lucas PL, de Vries B (2012) Scenarios in global environmental assessments: Key characteristics and lessons for future use. Global Environ Change 22(4):884-895.
22. Kriegler E, et al. (2012) The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: A new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environ Change 22(4):807-822.
23. Rosegrant MW, IMPACT Development Team (2012) International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT): Model Description (International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC).