Validation of patient specific surgical guides in total hip arthroplasty

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 113-120

  Sakai, Takashi ^a   Hanada, Toshihisa ^b   Murase, Tsuyoshi ^a   Kitada, Makoto ^c   Hamada, Hidetoshi ^a   Yoshikawa, Hideki ^a   Sugano, Nobuhiko ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Nakashima Medical Ltd   (Japan)

^c OSAKA KOSEI NENKIN HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Computed tomography; Patient specific surgical guide; Resurfacing; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ORTHOPEDICS;

ACCURACY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTACT TYPE; CORONAL PLANES; NARROW BASE; PATIENT SPECIFIC; PATIENT SPECIFIC SURGICAL GUIDE; PRE-OPERATIVE PLANNING; RESURFACING; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY;

ARTHROPLASTY;

RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SPECIFIC SURGICAL GUIDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACETABULUM; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CADAVER; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84895821472     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1547     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M, et al. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 354: 28-38.
2. Murase T, Oka K, Moritomo H, et al. Three-dimensional corrective osteotomy of malunited fractures of the upper extremity with use of a computersimulation system. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 2375-2389.
3. Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP. Computer-assisted total knee Arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 444: 184-192.
4. Kunz M, Rudan JF, Xenoyannis GL, Ellis RE. Computer-assissted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 600-606.
5. Raaijmaakers M, Gelaude F, De Smedt K, et al. A custom-made guide-wirepositioning device for hip surface replacement Arthroplasty: description and first results. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 161-167.
6. Andenaert E, De Smedt K, Gelaude F, et al. A custom-made guide for femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development and validation study. Comput Aided Surg 2011; 16: 304-309.
7. Kitada M, Sakai T, Murase T, et al. Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation. Int J Med Robot 2013; 9: 223-229.
8. Hananouchi T, Saito M, Koyama T, et al. Tailor-made surgical guide based on rapid prototyping technique for cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty. Int J Med Robot 2009; 5: 164-169.
9. Hananouchi T, Saito M, Koyama T, et al. Tailor-made surgical guide reduces incidence of outliers of cup placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 1088-1095.
10. Zhang YZ, Chen B, Lu S, et al. Preliminary application of computer-assisted patient-specific acetabular navigational template for total hip arthroplasty in adult single development dysplasia of the hip. Int J Med Robot 2011; 7: 469-474.
11. Miki H, Yamanashi W, Nishii T, et al. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 946-952.
12. Martha PE, Hafez MA, Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM, 3rd. Variation in acetabular anatomy with reference to total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 308-313.
13. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 282-288.
14. Shon WY, Baldini T, Peterson MG, et al. Impingement in total hip arthroplasty: a study of retrieved acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 427-435.
15. Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 530-534.
16. Amstutz HC, Lodwig RM, Schurman DJ, Hodgson AG. Range of motion studies for total hip replacements. A comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975; 111: 124-130.
17. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 815-821.
18. Cobb JP, Kannan V, Dandachli W, et al. Learning how to resurface cam-type femoral heads with acceptable accuracy and precision: the role of computed tomography-based navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90-A(Suppl): 57-64.
19. Steppacher SD, Kowal JH, Murphy SB. Improving cup positioning using a mechanical navigation instrument. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 423-428.
20. Kitada M, Nakamura N, Iwana D, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26: 674-679.