Comparison of lodgepole and jack pine resin chemistry: Implications for range expansion by the mountain pine beetle, dendroctonus ponderosae (coleoptera: Curculionidae)

PeerJ

Volumn 2014, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Clark, Erin L ^a   Pitt, Caitlin ^a   Carroll, Allan L ^b   Staffan Lindgren, B ^a   Huber, Dezene P W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bark beetles; Coleoptera; Curculionidae; Plant defense; Scolytinae; Secondary metabolites; Terpenes

Indexed keywords

RESIN; TERPENE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CURCULIONIDAE; DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE; ENANTIOMER; JACK PINE; LODGEPOLE PINE; NONHUMAN; PINE; PLANT DEFENSE;

EID: 84895729418     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21678359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.240     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Birgersson G, Leufvén A. 1988. The influence of host tree response to Ips typographus and fungal attack on production of semiochemicals. Insect Biochemistry 18:761-770 DOI 10.1016/0020-1790(88)90098-4.
2. Boone CK, Aukema BH, Bohlmann J, Carroll AL, Raffa KF. 2011. Efficacy of tree defense physiology varies with bark beetle population density: a basis for positive feedback in eruptive species. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41:1174-1188 DOI 10.1139/x11-041.
3. Borden JH, Pureswaran DS, Lafontaine JP. 2008. Synergistic blends of monoterpenes for aggregation pheromones of the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 101:1266-1275 DOI 10.1603/0022-0493(2008)101[1266:SBOMFA]2.0.CO;2.
4. Borden JH, Conn JE, Friskie LM, Scott BE, Chong LJ, Pierce HDJ, Oehlschlager AC. 1983. Semiochemicals for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in British Columbia: Baited-tree studies. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13:325-333 DOI 10.1139/x83-046.
5. Cerezke HF. 1995. Egg gallery, brood production, and adult characteristics of mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in three pine hosts. The Canadian Entomologist 127:955-964 DOI 10.4039/Ent127955-6.
6. Clark EL, Carroll AL, Huber DPW. 2010. Differences in the constitutive terpene profile of lodgepole pine across a geographical range in British Columbia, and correlation with historical attack by mountain pine beetle. The Canadian Entomologist 142:1-17 DOI 10.4039/n10-022.
7. Cook SP, Hain FP. 1988. Toxicity of host monoterpenes to Dendroctonus frontalis and Ips calligraphus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Entomological Science 23:2870-292.
8. Conn JE, Borden JH, Scott BE, Friskie LM, Pierce HD Jr, Oehlschlager AC. 1983. Semiochemicals for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in British Columbia: Field trapping studies. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13:320-324 DOI 10.1139/x83-045.
9. Conn JE, Borden JH, Hunt DWA, Holman J,Whitney HS, Spanier OJ, Pierce HD Jr, Oehlschlager AC. 1984. Pheromone production by axenically reared Dendroctonus ponderosae and Ips paraconfusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 10:281-290 DOI 10.1007/BF00987856.
10. Cudmore TJ, Björklund N, Carroll AL, Lindgren BS. 2010. Climate change and range expansion of an aggressive bark beetle: evidence of higher reproductive success in naïve host tree populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 47:1036-1043 DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01848.x.
11. Cullingham CI, James PMA, Cooke JEK, Coltman DW. 2012. Characterizing the physical and genetic structure of the lodgepole pine - jack pine hybrid zone: mosaic structure and differential introgression. Evolutionary Applications 5:879-891 DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00266.x.
12. Cullingham CI, Cooke JEK, Dang S, Davis CS, Cooke BJ, Coltman DW. 2011.Mountain pine beetle host-range expansion threatens the boreal forest. Molecular Ecology 20:1-15 DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05086.x.
13. Erbilgin N,Whitehouse C, Shan B, Najar A, Evenden M. 2013. Chemical similarity between historical and novel host plants promotes range and host expansion of the mountain pine beetle in a naïve host ecosystem. New Phytologist 201(3):940-950 DOI 10.1111/nph.12573.
14. Eyles A, Jones W, Riedle K, Cipollini D, Schwartz S, Chan K, Herms DA, Bonello P. 2007. Comparative phloem chemistry of Manchurian (Fraxinus mandshurica) and two North American ash species (Fraxinus americana and Fraxinus pennsylvanica). Journal of Chemical Ecology 33:1430-1448 DOI 10.1007/s10886-007-9312-3.
15. Forrest GI. 1980. Geographic variation in the monoterpenes of Pinus contorta oleoresin. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 8:343-359 DOI 10.1016/0305-1978(80)90037-X.
16. Furniss MM, Schenk JA. 1969. Sustained natural infestation by the mountain pine beetle in seven new Pinus and Picea hosts. Journal of Economic Entomology 62:518-519.
17. Gershenzon J, Croteau RB. 1991. Terpenoids. In: Rosenthal GA, Berembaum MR, eds. Herbivores: Their interactions with secondary plant metabolites. New York: CRC Press, 165-219.
18. Ghandi KJK, Herms DA. 2010. Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forest of eastern North America. Biological Invasions 12:389-405 DOI 10.1007/s10530-009-9627-9.
19. Haack RA, Jendek E, Liu H,Marchant KR, Petrice TR, Poland TM, Ye H. 2002. The emerald ash borer: A new exotic pest in North America. Newsletter of the Michigan Entomological Society 47:1-5.
20. Hunt DWA, Borden JH, Lindgren BS, Gries G. 1989. The role of autoxidation of α-pinene in the production of pheromones of Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19:1275-1282 DOI 10.1139/x89-194.
21. Keane RM, Crawley MJ. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 117:164-170 DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0.
22. Keeling CI, Bohlmann J. 2006. Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defense of conifers against insects and pathogens. New Phytologist 170:657-675 DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01716.x.
23. Langor D, Rice A,Williams D. 2007.Mountain pine beetle invasion of boreal forests. Canadian Silviculture. 2007(1):5-7.
24. Lee S, Kim J-J, Breuil C. 2006. Diversity of fungi associated with the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae and infested lodgepole pines in British Columbia. Fungal Diversity 22:91-105.
25. Lindström M, Norin T, Birgersson G, Schlyter F. 1989. Variation of enantiomeric composition ofα-pinene in Norway spruce, Picea abies, and its influence on production of verbenol isomers by Ips typographus in the field. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15:541-548 DOI 10.1007/BF01014699.
26. Little EL Jr. 1971. Atlas of United States trees. Volume 1: conifers and important hardwoods. 1146. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication.
27. Logan JA, Powell JA. 2001. Ghost forests, global warming, and the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). American Entomologist 47:160-172.
28. Miller DR, Lafontaine JP. 1991. cis-Verbenol: An aggregation pheromone for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 88:34-38.
29. Miller DR, Borden JH. 2000. Dose-dependent and species-specific response of pine bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to monoterpenes in association with pheromones. The Canadian Entomologist 132:183-195 DOI 10.4039/Ent132183-2.
30. Miller DR, Borden JH. 1990. β-phellandrene: Kairomone for pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 16:2519-2531 DOI 10.1007/BF01017475.
31. Miller RH, Berryman AA, Ryan CA. 1986. Biotic elicitors of defense reactions in lodgepole pine. Phytochemistry 25:611-612 DOI 10.1016/0031-9422(86)88008-6.
32. Moeck HA, Simmons CS. 1991. Primary attraction of mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to bolts of lodgepole pine. The Canadian Entomologist 123:299-304 DOI 10.4039/Ent123299-2.
33. Moss EH. 1949. Natural pine hybrids in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Research 27c(5):218-229 DOI 10.1139/cjr49c-018.
34. Poland TM,McCullough DG. 2006. Emerald ash borer: Invasion of the urban forest and the treat to North America's ash resource. Journal of Forestry 104:118-124.
35. Pollack JC, Dancik BP. 1985.Monoterpene and morphological variation and hybridization of Pinus contorta and P. banksiana in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 63:201-210 DOI 10.1139/b85-023.
36. Pureswaran DS, Borden JH. 2003. Test of semiochemical mediated host specificity in four species of tree killing bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmental Entomology 32:963-969 DOI 10.1603/0046-225X-32.5.963.
37. Pureswaran DS, Gries R, Borden JH. 2004. Quantitative variation in monoterpenes in four species of conifers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 32:1109-1136 DOI 10.1016/j.bse.2004.04.006.
38. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org.
39. Raffa KF. 1991. Induced defensive reactions in conifer-bark beetle systems. In: Tallamy DW, Raupp MJ, eds. Phytochemical induction by herbivores. New York: JohnWiley and Sons, Inc, 245-276.
40. Raffa KF, Berryman AA. 1982. Physiological differences between lodgepole pines resistant and susceptible to the mountain pine beetle and associated microorganisms. Environmental Entomology 11:486-492.
41. Raffa KF, Berryman AA. 1983a. The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecological Monographs 53:27-49 DOI 10.2307/1942586.
42. Raffa KF, Berryman AA. 1983b. Physiological aspects of lodgepole pine wound responses to a fungal symbiont of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). The Canadian Entomologist 115:723-734 DOI 10.4039/Ent115723-7.
43. Raffa KF, Berryman AA. 1987. Interacting selective pressures in conifer-bark beetle systems: A basis for reciprocal adaptations? American Naturalist of the United States of America 129:234-262.
44. Raffa KF, Powell EN, Townsend PA. 2013. Temperature-driven range expansion of an irruptive insect heightened by weakly coevolved plant defenses. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA 110:2193-2198 DOI 10.1073/pnas.1216666110.
45. Raffa KF, Berryman AA, Simasko J, Teal W,Wong BL. 1985. Effects of grand fir monoterpenes on the fir engraver Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and its symbiotic fungus. Environmental Entomology 14:552-556.
46. Rebek EJ, Herms DA, Smitley DR. 2008. Interspecific variation in resistance to emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) among North American and Asian ash (Fraxinus spp.). Environmental Entomology 37:242-246 DOI 10.1603/0046-225X(2008)37[242:IVIRTE]2.0.CO;2.
47. Renwick JAA, Hughes PR, Krull IS. 1976. Selective production of cis- and trans-verbenol from (-)-and (+)-α-pinene by a bark beetle. Science 191:199-201 DOI 10.1126/science.1246609.
48. Rudinsky JA. 1962. Ecology of scolytidae. Annual Review of Entomology 7:327-348 DOI 10.1146/annurev.en.07.010162.001551.
49. Safranyik L, Carroll AL. 2006. The biology and epidemiology of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests. In: Safranyik L,Wilson WR, eds. The mountain pine beetle: A synthesis of biology, management, and impacts on lodgepole pine. Victoria, British Columbia: Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, 3-66.
50. Safranyik L, Linton DA. 1982. Survival and development of mountain pine beetle broods in jack pine bolts from Ontario. Canadian Forestry Service Research Notes 2:17-18.
51. Safranyik L, Carroll AL, Régnière J, Langor DW, RielWG, Shorem TL, Peter B, Cooke BJ, Nealis VG, Taylor SW. 2010. Potential for range expansion of mountain pine beetle into the boreal forest of North America. The Canadian Entomologist 142:415-442 DOI 10.4039/n08-CPA01.
52. Seybold SJ. 1993. Role of chirality in olfactory-directed behavior: Aggregation of pine engraver beetles in the genus Ips (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 19:1809-1831 DOI 10.1007/BF00982310.
53. Shrimpton DM. 1973. Extractives associated with wound response of lodgepole pine attacked by the mountain pine beetle and associated microorganisms. Canadian Journal of Botany 51:527-534 DOI 10.1139/b73-064.
54. Smith RH. 1961. The fumigant toxicity of three pine resins to Dendroctonus brevicomis and D. Jeffreyi. Journal of Economic Entomology 54:365-369.
55. Smith RH. 1963. Toxicity of pine resin vapors to three species of Dendroctonus bark beetles. Journal of Economic Entomology 56:827-831.
56. Smith RH. 1965. Effect of monoterpene vapors on the western pine beetle. Journal of Economic Entomology 58:509-510.
57. Smith RH. 1983.Monoterpenes of lodgepole pine xylem resin: a regional study inWestern United States. Forest Science 29:333-340.
58. Wallin KF, Raffa KF. 1999. Altered constitutive and inducible phloem monoterpenes following natural defoliation of jack pine: Implications to host mediated interguild interactions and plant defense theories. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25:861-880 DOI 10.1023/A:1020853019309.
59. Whitehead AT, Scott DT, Schmitz RF,Mori K. 1989. Electroantennograms by mountain pine beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, exposed to selected chiral semiochemicals. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15:2089-209 DOI 10.1007/BF01207440.