Climate change and range expansion of an aggressive bark beetle: Evidence of higher beetle reproduction in naïve host tree populations

Journal of Applied Ecology

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1036-1043

  Cudmore, Timothy J ^a   Björklund, Niklas ^b   Carroll, Allan L ^c   Staffan Lindgren, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Climate change; Climatic suitability class; Co evolution; Lodgepole pine; Mountain pine beetle; Range expansion; Reproductive success; Selection pressure; Suitability; Susceptibility

Indexed keywords

AGE CLASS; BEETLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; COEVOLUTION; CONIFEROUS FOREST; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; FITNESS; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HERBIVORE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; MORTALITY; PEST SPECIES; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; POPULATION OUTBREAK; RANGE EXPANSION; REPRODUCTIVE PRODUCTIVITY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS;

CANADA;

COLEOPTERA; DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE; HEXAPODA; PINUS CONTORTA; PINUS MUGO; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 77956111157     PISSN: 00218901     EISSN: 13652664     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01848.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Amman GD. Mountain pine beetle brood production in relation to thickness of lodgepole pine phloem. Journal of Economic Entomology 1972, 65:138-140.
2. Amman GD. Population changes of the mountain pine beetle in relation to elevation. Environmental Entomology 1973, 2:541-547.
3. Amman GD, McGregor MD, Cahill DB, Klein WH. Guidelines for reducing losses of lodgepole pine to the mountain pine beetle in unmanaged stands in the Rocky Mountains. 1977, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report, INT-36, pp
4. Aukema BH, Carroll AL, Zhu J, Raffa KF, Sickley T, Taylor SW. Landscape level analysis of mountain pine beetle in British Columbia, Canada: spatiotemporal development and spatial synchrony within the present outbreak. Ecography 2006, 29:427-441.
5. Berryman AA, Dennis B, Raffa KF, Stenseth NC. Evolution of optimal group attack, with particular reference to bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecology 1985, 66:898-903.
6. Björklund N, Lindgren BS. Diameter of lodgepole pine and mortality caused by the mountain pine beetle: factors that influence the relationship and their applicability for susceptibility rating. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2009, 39:908-916.
7. Björklund N, Lindgren BS, Shore TL, Cudmore T. Can predicted mountain pine beetle net production be used to improve stand prioritization for management? Forest Ecology and Management 2009, 257:233-237.
8. Cabrera H. Phloem structure and development in lodgepole pine. Theory and Practice of Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Lodgepole Pine Forests 1978, 54-63. Kibbee DLBerryman AAAmman GDStark RW. eds, Forest, Wildlife & Range Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID
9. Carroll AL, Taylor S, Régniere J, Safranyik L. Effects of climate change on range expansion by the mountain pine beetle in British Columbia. Mountain Pine Beetle Symposium: Challenges and Solutions 2004, 223-232. Shore TL, Brooks JE, Stone JE, eds, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC
10. Clark E. Terpene composition of lodgepole and jack pine and its relationship to the success of the mountain pine beetle. 2008, MSc Thesis, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC
11. Coupé R, Stewart AC, Wikeem BM. Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir Zone. Ecosystems of British Columbia 1991, 223-236. Meidinger D, Pojar J, eds, Crown Publications, Victoria, BC
12. Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytologist 2005, 167:353-375.
13. Furniss RL, Carolin VM. Western Forest Insects 1977, USDA Forest Service Misc. Publ. No. 1339, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
14. Ghandi KJK, Herms DA. Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forest of eastern North America. Biological Invasions 2010, 12:389-405.
15. Hanski I, Erälahti C, Kankare M, Ovaskainen O, Sirén H. Variation in migration propensity among individuals maintained by landscape structure. Ecology Letters 2004, 7:958-966.
16. Hemingway RW, McGraw GW, Barras SJ. Polyphenols in Ceratocystis minor infected Pinus taeda: fungal metabolites, phloem and xylem phenols. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1977, 25:717-722.
17. Herms DA, Mattson WJ. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology 1992, 67:283-335.
18. Hopkins AD. The bioclimatic law as applied to entomological research and farm practice. Science Monographs 1919, 8:496-513.
19. Hughes L. Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2000, 15:56-61.
20. Hughes CL, Hill JK, Dytham C. Evolutionary trade-offs between reproduction and dispersal in populations at expanding range boundaries. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (Suppl.) 2003, 269:S147-S150.
21. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Pachauri RKReisinger A. IPCC, eds, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp
22. Jepsen JU, Hagen SB, Ims RA, Yoccoz NG. Climate change and outbreaks of the geometrids Operophtera brumata and Epirrita autumnata in subarctic birch forest: evidence of a recent outbreak range expansion. Journal of Animal Ecology 2008, 77:257-264.
23. Krcmar-Nozic E, Wilson B, Arthur L. The potential impacts of exotic forest pests in North America: a synthesis of research 2000, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Information Report BC-X-387, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC, pp
24. Kurz WA, Dymond CC, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Neilson ET, Carroll AL, Ebata T, Safranyik L. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon: feedback to climate change. Nature 2008, 454:987-990.
25. Liebhold AM, MacDonald WL, Bergdahl D, Mastro VC. Invasion by exotic forest pests: a threat to forest ecosystems. Forest Science 1995, 41:1-49.
26. Logan JA, Powell JA. Ghost forests, global warming, and the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). American Naturalist 2001, 47:160-172.
27. Ecosystems of British Columbia, BC 1991, Meidinger DPojar J. eds, Ministry of Forests, Victoria, BC, Special Report No. 6, pp. Crown Publications, Victoria, BC
28. Meidinger D, Pojar J, Harper WL. Sub-Boreal Spruce Zone. Ecosystems of British Columbia 1991, 209-221. Meidinger D, Pojar J, eds, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, BC. Special Report No. 6, Crown Publications, Victoria, BC
29. Niemelä P, Mattson WJ. Invasion of North American forests by European phytophagous insects. BioScience 1996, 46:741-753.
30. Poland T, McCullough D. Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America's ash resource. Journal of Forestry 2006, 104:118-124.
31. Raffa KF, Berryman AA. The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecological Monographs 1983, 53:27-49.
32. Raffa KF, Berryman AA. Interacting selective pressures in conifer-bark beetle systems: a basis for reciprocal adaptations? American Naturalist 1987, 129:234-262.
33. Raffa KF, Aukema BH, Bentz BJ, Carroll AL, Hicke JA, Turner MG, Romme WH. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. BioScience 2008, 58:501-517.
34. Raupp MJ, Shrewsbury PM, Herms DA. Ecology of herbivorous arthropods in urban landscapes. Annual Review of Entomology 2010, 55:19-38.
35. Régnière J. A generalized approach to landscape-wide seasonal forecasting with temperature-driven simulation models. Environmental Entomology 1996, 25:869-881.
36. Reid RW. Biology of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus monticolae Hopkins, in the East Kootenay region of British Columbia III. Interaction between the beetle and its host, with emphasis on brood mortality and survival. The Canadian Entomologist 1963, 95:225-238.
37. Rosenzweig C, Casassa G, Karoly DJ, Imeson A, Liu C, Menzel A, Rawlins S, Root TL, Seguin B, Tryjanowski P. Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 79-131. Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE, eds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
38. Safranyik L. Development of a technique for sampling mountain pine beetle populations in lodgepole pine. 1968, PhD Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
39. Safranyik L. Effects of climate and weather on mountain pine beetle populations. Theory and Practice of Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Lodgepole Pine Forests 1978, 77-84. Kibbee DLBerryman AAAmman GDStark RW. eds, Forest, Wildlife & Range Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID
40. Safranyik L. Mountain pine beetle: biology overview. Symposium on the Management of Lodgepole Pine to Minimize Losses to the Mountain Pine Beetle 1988a, 9-13. Amman GD. ed, Intermountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Kalispell, MT
41. Safranyik L. Estimating attack and brood totals and densities of the mountain pine beetle in individual lodgepole pine trees. The Canadian Entomologist 1988b, 120:323-331.
42. Safranyik L, Carroll AL. The biology and epidemiology of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests. The Mountain Pine Beetle: a Synthesis of its Biology and Management in Lodgepole Pine 2006, 3-66. Safranyik L, Wilson B. eds, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC
43. Safranyik L, Shrimpton DM, Whitney HS. An interpretation of the interaction between lodgepole pine, the mountain pine beetle and its associated blue stain fungi in western Canada. Management of Lodgepole Pine Ecosystems 1975, 406-428. Baumgartner DM, ed, Washington State University Cooperative Extension Service, Pullman, WA
44. Schaefer PW. Foreign exploration for emerald ash borer and its natural enemies. Proceedings of the Emerald Ash Borer Research and Technology Development Meeting 2005, 67-68. Mastro VCReardon R. eds, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV
45. Simmons AD, Thomas CD. Changes in dispersal during species' range expansions. American Naturalist 2004, 164:378-395.
46. Struble GR, Johnson PC. The mountain pine beetle. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Forest Pest Leaflet 1955, 2:4.
47. Sturgeon KB. Monoterpene variation in ponderosa pine xylem resin related to western pine beetle predation. Evolution 1979, 33:803-814.
48. Sturgeon KB, Mitton JB. Evolution of bark beetle communities. Bark Beetles in North American Conifers 1982, 350-384. Mitton J B, Sturgeon K B. eds, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX
49. Taylor SW, Carroll AL, Alfaro RI, Safranyik L. Forest, climate and mountain pine beetle outbreak dynamics in western Canada. The Mountain Pine: A Synthesis of Biology, Management, and Impacts on Lodgepole Pine 2006, 67-94. Safranyik L, Wilson WR, eds, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC
50. Thomas JA, Rose RJ, Clarke RT, Thomas CD, Webb NR. Intraspecific variation in habitat availability among ectothermic animals near their climatic limits and their centres of range. Functional Ecology 1999, 13(Suppl. 1):55-64.
51. Williams AM, Liebhold AM. Climate change and the outbreak ranges of two North American bark beetles. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2002, 4:87-99.
52. Wood SL. A revision of the bark beetle genus Dendroctonus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Great Basin Naturalist 1963, 13:1-117.
53. Wood CS, Unger L. Mountain pine beetle: a history of outbreaks in pine forests in British Columbia, 1910 to 1995. 1996, Victoria, BC, pp
54. Yanchuk AD, Murphy JC, Wallin KF. Evaluation of genetic variation of attack and resistance in lodgepole pine in the early stages of a mountain pine beetle outbreak. Tree Genetics & Genomes 2008, 4:171-180.