Differences in the constitutive terpene profile of lodgepole pine across a geographical range in British Columbia, and correlation with historical attack by mountain pine beetle

Canadian Entomologist

Volumn 142, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 557-573

  Clark, Erin L ^a   Carroll, Allan L ^b   Huber, Dezene P W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; CHEMICAL DEFENSE; CONIFEROUS FOREST; CORRELATION; PEST OUTBREAK; PEST RESISTANCE; PHEROMONE; PHLOEM; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; PHYTOGEOGRAPHY; SURVIVAL; TERPENE;

BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA;

COLEOPTERA; CONIFEROPHYTA; CURCULIONIDAE; DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE; HEXAPODA; PINUS CONTORTA; PINUS ECHINATA; PINUS MUGO;

EID: 78649617311     PISSN: 0008347X     EISSN: 19183240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4039/n10-022     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Amman, G.D. 1972. Mountain pine beetle brood production in relation to thickness of lodgepole pine phloem. Journal of Economic Entomology, 65: 138-140.
2. Amman, G.D., and Cole, W.E. 1983. Mountain pine beetle dynamics in lodgepole pine forests. Part II: Population dynamics. United States Forest Service General Technical Report INT-145.
3. Amman, G.D., and Pace, V.E. 1976. Optimum egg gallery densities for the mountain pine beetle in relation to lodgepole pine phloem thickness. United States Forest Service Research Note INT-209.
4. Atkins, M.D. 1966. Behavioral variation among scolytids in relation to their habitat. The Canadian Entomologist, 98: 285-288. doi:10.4039/Ent98285-3.
5. Bell, W.J. 1990. Searching behaviour: the behavioural ecology of finding resources. Chapman and Hall, New York.
6. Berryman, A.A. 1976. Theoretical explanation of mountain pine beetle dynamics in lodgepole pine forests. Environmental Entomology, 5: 1225-1233.
7. Borden, J.H. 1985. Aggregation pheromones. In Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology. Edited by G.A. Kerkut and L.I. Gilbert. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. pp. 257-285.
8. Borden, J.H., Ryker, L.J., Chong, L.J., Pierce, F., H.D., Johnston, B.D., and Oehlschlager, A.C. 1987. Response of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to five semiochemicals in British Columbia lodgepole pine forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17: 118-128. doi:10. 1139/x87-023.
9. Carroll, A.L., Taylor, S.W., Régnière, J., and Safra-nyik, L. 2004. Effects of climate change on range expansion by the mountain pine beetle in British Columbia. In Proceedings of the Mountain Pine Beetle Symposium: Challenges and Solutions, Kelowna, British Columbia, 30-31 October 2003. Edited by T.L. Shore, J.E. Brooks, and J.E. Stone. Natural Resources Canada, Victoria, British Columbia. pp. 223-232.
10. Christiansen, E., Waring, R.H., and Berryman, A.A. 1987. Resistance of conifers to bark beetle attack: searching for general relationships. Forest Ecology and Management, 22: 89-106. doi:10. 1016/0378-1127(87)90098-3.
11. Cole, W.E., and Amman, G.D. 1969. Mountain pine beetle infestations in relation to lodgepole pine diameters. United States Forest Service. INT-95.
12. Cole, W.E., Guymon, E.P., Jensen, C.E. 1981. Monoterpenes of lodgepole pine phloem as related to mountain pine beetles. United States Forest Service Research Paper INT-281.
13. Conn, J.E., Borden, J.H., Scott, B.E., Friskie, L.M., Pierce, Jr., H.D., and Oehlschlager, A.C. 1983. Semiochemicals for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolyti-dae) in British Columbia: field trapping studies. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13: 320-324. doi:10.1139/x83-045.
14. Conn, J.E., Borden, J.H., Hunt, D.W.A., Holman, J., Whitney, H.S., Spanier, O.J., Pierce, Jr., H.D., and Oehlschlager, A.C. 1984. Pheromone production by axenically reared Dendroctonus ponderosae and Ips paraconfusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 10: 281-290. doi:10.1007/BF00987856.
15. Coyne, J.F., and Lott, L.H. 1976. Toxicity of substances in pine oleoresin to southern pine beetles. The Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society, 11: 297-301.
16. Craighead, F.C., Miller, J.M., Evenden, J.C., and Keen, F.P. 1931. Control work against bark beetles in western forests and an appraisal of its results. Journal of Forestry, 29: 1001-1018.
17. Dahlsten, D.L. 1982. Relationship between bark beetles and their natural enemies. In Bark beetles in North American conifers: a system for the study of evolutionary biology. Edited by J.B. Mit-ton and K.B. Sturgeon. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas. pp. 140-182.
18. Elkinton, J.S., and Wood, D.L. 1980. Feeding and boring behavior of the bark beetle Ips paraconfu-sus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on the bark of a host and its non-host tree species. The Canadian Entomologist, 112: 797-809. doi:10.4039/Ent112797-8.
19. Forrest, G.I. 1980. Geographical variation in the monoterpenes of Pinus contorta oleoresin. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 8: 343-359. doi:10.1016/0305-1978(80)90037-X.
20. Franceschi, V.R., Krokene, P., Christiansen, E., and Krekling, T. 2005. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytologist, 167: 353-376. PMID: 15998390 doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137. 2005.01436.x. (Pubitemid 41576975)
21. Franklin, E.C., and Snyder, E.B. 1971. Variation and inheritance of monoterpene composition in longleaf pine. Forest Science, 17: 178-179.
22. Gershenzon, J., and Croteau, R.B. 1991. Terpenoids. In Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites. Edited by G.A. Rosenthal and M.R. Berembaum. Academic Press, San Diego, California. pp. 165-219.
23. Gilmore, A.R. 1977. Effects of soil moisture stress on monoterpenes in loblolly pine. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 3: 667-676. doi:10.1007/BF00988066.
24. Hanover, J.W. 1966. Genetics of terpenes: I. Gene control of monoterpene levels in Pinus monticola Dougl. Heredity, 21: 73-84. doi:10.1038/hdy.1966.5.
25. Hanover, J.W., and Furniss, M.M. 1966. Monoter-pene concentration in Douglas-fir in relation to geographic location and resistance to attack by the Douglas-fir beetle. In Joint Proceedings of the Second Genetics Workshop of the Society of American Foresters and the Seventh Lake States Forest Tree Improvement Conference. United States Forest Service Research Paper NC-6. pp. 23-28.
26. Herms, D.A., and Mattson, W.J. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 67: 283-335. doi:10. 1086/417659.
27. Huber, D.P.W., Gries, R., Borden, J.H., and Pierce, H.D., Jr. 2003. A survey of antennal responses by five species of coniferophagous bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to bark volatiles of six species of angiosperm trees. Chemoecology, 10: 103-113. doi:10.1007/PL00001811.
28. Huber, D.P.W., Ralph, S., and Bohlmann, J. 2004. Genomic hardwiring and phenotypic plasticity of terpenoid-based defenses in conifers. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 30: 2399-2418. PMID:15724963 doi:10.1007/s10886-004-7942-2. (Pubitemid 40249013)
29. Hughes, P.R. 1973. Effect of a-pinene exposure on trans-verbenol synthesis in Dendroctonus ponder-osae Hopk. Naturwissenschaften, 60: 261-262. doi:10.1007/BF00625726.
30. Hunt, D.W.A., Borden, J.H., Lindgren, B.S., and Gries, G. 1989. The role of autoxidation of a-pinene in the production of pheromones of Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 19: 1275-1282.
31. Hynum, B.G., and Berryman, A.A. 1980. Dendroc-tonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Pre-aggregation landing and gallery initiation on lod-gepole pine. The Canadian Entomologist, 112: 185-191. doi:10.4039/Ent112185- 2.
32. Keeling, C.I., and Bohlmann, J. 2006. Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defense of conifers against insects and pathogens. New Phytologist, 170: 657-675. PMID:16684230 doi:10.1111/j. 1469-8137.2006.01716.x.
33. Klepzig, K.D., Kruger, E.L., Smalley, E.B., and Raffa, K.F. 1995. Effects of biotic and abiotic stress on induced accumulation of terpenes and phenolics in red pines inoculated with bark beetle-vectored fungus. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 21: 601-626. doi:10.1007/BF02033704.
34. Klepzig, K.D., Smalley, E.B., and Raffa, K.F. 1996. Combined chemical defenses against an insect- fungal complex. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 22: 1367-1388. doi:10.1007/BF02027719.
35. Lee, S., Kim, J.-J., and Breuil, C. 2006. Pathogeni-city of Leptographium longiclavatum associated with Dendroctonus ponderosae to Pinus contorta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36: 2867-2872. doi:10.1139/X06-194. (Pubitemid 46622540)
36. Lewinsohn, E., Gijzen, M., Muzika, R.M., Barton, K., and Croteau, R. 1993. Oleoresinosis in grand fir (Abies grandis) saplings and mature trees. Plant Physiology, 101: 1021-1028. PMID:12231755.
37. Logan, J.A., and Powell, J.A. 2001. Ghost forests, global warming, and the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). American Entomologist, 47: 160-172.
38. Mickey, R.M., Dunn, O.J., and Clark, V.A. 2004. Applied statistics analysis of variance and regression. JohnWiley&Sons,Inc.,Hoboken,NewJersey.
39. Mitton, J.B., and Sturgeon, K.B. 1982. Biotic interactions and evolutionary change. In Bark beetles in North American conifers: a system for the study of evolutionary biology. Edited by J.B. Mit-ton and K.B. Sturgeon. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas. pp. 3-20.
40. Moeck, H.A., and Simmons, C.S. 1991. Primary attraction of mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to bolts of lodgepole pine. The Canadian Entomologist, 123: 299-304. doi:10.4039/Ent123299- 2.
41. Pitman, G.B. 1971. Trans-verbenol and alpha-pinene: their utility in manipulation of the mountain pine beetle. Journal of Economic Entomology, 64: 426-430.
42. Pureswaran, D.S., and Borden, J.H. 2003. Test of semiochemical mediated host specificity in four species of tree killing bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmental Entomology, 32: 963-969. doi:10.1603/0046-225X-32.5. 963.
43. Pureswaran, D.S., Gries, R., and Borden, J.H. 2004. Quantitative variation in monoterpenes in four species of conifers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 32: 1109-1136. doi:10.1016/j.bse.2004. 04.006.
44. Pureswaran, D.S., Sullivan, B.T., and Ayres, M.P. 2006. Fitness consequences of pheromone production and host selection strategies in a tree-killing bark beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Oecologia, 148: 720-728. doi:10. 1007/s00442-006-0400-9.
45. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from http://www. R-project.org [accessed September 2008].
46. Raffa, K.F., and Berryman, A.A. 1982. Physiological differences between lodgepole pines resistant and susceptible to the mountain pine beetle and associated microorganisms. Environmental Entomologist, 11: 486-492.
47. Raffa, K.F., and Berryman, A.A. 1983a. Physiological aspects of lodgepole pine wound responses to a fungal symbiont of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleop-tera: Scolytidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 115: 723-734. doi:10.4039/Ent115723-7.
48. Raffa, K.F., and Berryman, A.A. 1983b. The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolyti-dae). Ecological Monographs, 53: 27-49. doi:10. 2307/1942586.
49. Raffa, K.F., and Berryman, A.A. 1987. Interacting selective pressures in conifer 2 bark beetle systems: a basis for reciprocal adaptations? The American Naturalist, 129: 234-262. doi:10.1086/284633.
50. Raffa, K.F., Aukema, B.H., Bentz, B.J., Carroll, A.L., Hicke, J.A., Turnder, M.G., and Romme, W.H. 2008. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. BioScience, 58: 501-517. doi:10.1641/B580607. (Pubitemid 351881194)
51. Reid, R.W., Whitney, H.S., and Watson, J.A. 1967. Reactions of lodgepole pine to attack by Den-droctonus ponderosae Hopkins and blue stain fungi. Canadian Journal of Botany, 45: 1115-1126. doi:10.1139/b67-116.
52. Rockwood, D.L. 1973. Variation in the monoter-pene composition of two oleoresin systems of loblolly pine. Forest Science, 19: 147-153.
53. Rudinsky, J.A. 1962. Ecology of Scolytidae. In Annual review of entomology. Edited by E.A. Steinhaus and R.F. Smith. Annual Reviews, Inc., Palo Alto, California. pp. 327-348.
54. Safranyik, L., and Carroll, A.L. 2006. The biology and epidemiology of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests. In The mountain pine beetle: a synthesis of biology, management, and impacts on lodgepole pine. Edited by L. Safranyik and W.R. Wilson. Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Victoria, British Columbia. pp. 3-66.
55. Safranyik, L., Shrimpton, D.M., and Whitney, H.S. 1974. Management of lodgepole pine to reduce losses from the mountain pine beetle. Victoria, BC. Technical Report No. 1, Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Victoria, British Columbia.
56. Seybold, S.J., Huber, D.P.W., Lee, J.C., Graves, A.D., and Bohlmann, J. 2006. Pine monoterpenes and pine bark beetles: a marriage of convenience for defense and chemical communication. Phyto-chemistry Reviews, 5: 143-178. doi:10.1007/s11101-006-9002-8. (Pubitemid 44114868)
57. Shepherd, R.F. 1966. Factors influencing the orientation and rates of activity of Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 98: 507-518. doi: 10.4039/Ent98507-5.
58. Smith, R.H. 1963. Toxicity of pine resin vapors to three species of Dendroctonus bark beetles. Journal of Economic Entomology, 56: 827-831.
59. Smith, R.H. 1965. Effect of monoterpene vapors on the western pine beetle. Journal of Economic Entomology, 58: 509-510.
60. Smith, R.H. 1975. Formula for describing effect of insect and host tree factors on resistance to western pine beetle attack. Journal of Economic Entomology, 68: 841-844.
61. Smith, R.H. 1983. Monoterpenes of lodgepole pine xylem resin: a regional study in western United States. Forest Science, 29: 333-340.
62. Squillace, A.E. 1971. Inheritance of monoterpene composition in cortical oleoresin of slash pine. Forest Science, 17: 381-387.
63. Sturgeon, K.B. 1979. Monoterpene variation in ponderosa pine xylem resin related to western pine beetle predation. Evolution, 33: 803-814. doi:10.2307/2407647.
64. Tabachnick, B.G., and Fidell, L.S. 2001. Using mul-tivariate statistics. 4th ed. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts.
65. Taylor, S.W., and Carroll, A.L. 2004. Disturbance, forest age, and mountain pine beetle outbreak dynamics in BC: a historical perspective. In Mountain Pine Beetle Symposium: Challenges and Solutions, Kelowna, British Columbia, 30- 31 October 2003. Edited by T.L. Shore, J.E. Brooks, and J.E. Stone.Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Victoria, British Columbia. pp. 41-51.
66. Thompson, J.N. 1997. Evaluating the dynamics of coevolution among geographically structured populations. Ecology, 78: 1619-1623. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1619:ETDOCA]2.0.CO;2.
67. Tomlin, E.S., Borden, J.H., and Pierce, H.D., Jr. 1997. Relationship between volatile foliar ter-penes and resistance of Sitka spruce to the white pine weevil. Forest Science, 43: 501-508.
68. Wallin, K.F., and Raffa, K.F. 1999. Altered constitutive and inducible phloem monoterpenes following natural defoliation of jack pine: implications to host mediated interguild interactions and plant defense theories. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25: 861-880. doi:10.1023/A:1020853019309.
69. Wallin, K.F., and Raffa, K.F. 2000. Influences of host chemicals and internal physiology on the multiple steps of postlanding host acceptance behavior of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmental Entomology, 29: 442-453. doi:10. 1603/0046-225X-29.3.442.
70. Wallin, K.F., and Raffa, K.F. 2004. Feedback between individual host selection behavior and population dynamics in an eruptive herbivore. Ecological Monographs, 74: 101-116. doi:10.1890/02-4004.
71. Waring, R.H., and Pitman, G.B. 1985. Modifying lodgepole pine stands to change susceptibility to mountain pine beetle attack. Ecology, 66: 889-897. doi:10.2307/1940551.
72. Westfall, J., and Ebata, T. 2008. Summary of forest health conditions in British Columbia. Pest Management Report No. 15, British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range, Victoria, British Columbia.
73. Wood, S.L. 1982. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scoly-tidae): a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs No. 6, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.