Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology

Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-218

  Embick, David ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895611621     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (147)

1. Adger, David, Susana Béjar, and Daniel Harbour. 2001. Allomorphy: Adjacency and Agree. Paper presented at the 23rd GLOW Colloquium, Braga, Portugal.
2. Adger, David, Susana Béjar, and Daniel Harbour. 2003. Directionality of allomorphy:A reply to Carstairs-McCarthy. Transactions of the Philological Society 101:1 109-115.
3. Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Functional structure in nominals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Allen, Margaret. 1979. Morphological investigations. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
5. Anderson, Stephen. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Andrews, Avery. 1990. Unification and morphological blocking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8:4 507-557.
7. Aranovich, Raúl, Sharon Inkelas, Orhan Orgun, and Ronald Sprouse. 2005. Opacity in phonologically conditioned suppletion. Paper presented at the Thirteenth Manchester Phonology Meeting.
8. Arnott, David Whitehorn. 1970. The nominal and verbal systems of Fula. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
9. Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
10. Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Bachrach, Asaf, and Michael Wagner. 2006. Syntactically driven cyclicity vs. output-output correspondence: The case of adjunction in diminutive morphology. Paper presented at the Penn Linguistics Colloquium.
12. Bergsland, Knut. 1976. Lappische Grammatik mit Lesestücken. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
13. Bhatt, Rajesh, and David Embick. 2003. Causative derivations in Hindi. Ms., University of Texas and University of Pennsylvania.
14. Blevins, Juliette. 1999. Untangling Leti infixation. Oceanic Linguistics 38:2 383-403.
15. Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1999. Implications of Itelmen agreement asymmetries. In Steve S. Chang, Lily Liaw, and Josef Ruppenhofer, eds., Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistics Society 25, 299-310. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Linguistics Society.
16. Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2000. The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. In Kleanthes K. Grohmann and Caro Struijke, eds., Proceedings of the Maryland Mayfest on Morphology 1999, 35-71. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 10. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Department of Linguistics.
17. Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. Syncretism without paradigms: Remarks on Williams 1981, 1994. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, eds., Yearbook of morphology 2001, 53-85. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2008. Paradigms (optimal and otherwise): A case for skepticism. In Asaf Bachrach and Andrew Nevins, eds., Inflectional identity, 29-54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Bobaljik, Jonathan David, and Susi Wurmbrand. 2002. Notes on agreement in Itelmen. Linguistic Discovery 1.
20. Bonet, Eulália. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
21. Bonet, Eulália, Maria-Rosa Lloret, and Joan Mascaró. 2007. Allomorph selection and lexical preference: Two case studies. Lingua 117:9 903-927.
22. Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Explaining morphosyntactic competition. In Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, eds., Handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 1-44. Oxford:Blackwell.
23. Bromberger, Sylvain, and Morris Halle. 1989. Why phonology is different. Linguistic Inquiry 20:1 51-70.
24. Buck, Carl Darling. 1933. Comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
25. Burzio, Luigi. 1998. Multiple correspondence. Lingua 104:1-2, 79-109.
26. Bye, Patrik. 2008. Allomorphy: Selection, not optimization. In Sylvia Blaho, Patrik Bye, and Martin Krämer, eds., Freedom of analysis?, 63-92. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
27. Carstairs, Andrew. 1987. Allomorphy in inflexion. London: Croom Helm.
28. Carstairs, Andrew. 1988. Some implications of phonologically conditioned suppletion. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, eds., Yearbook of morphology 1988, 67-94. Dordrecht: Foris.
29. Carstairs, Andrew. 1990. Phonologically conditioned suppletion. In Wolfgang Dressler, Hans Luschützky, Oskar Pfeiffer, and John Rennison, eds., Selected papers from the Third International Morphology Meeting, 17-24. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
30. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1992. Contemporary morphology. London:Routledge.
31. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2001. Grammatically conditioned allomorphy, paradigmatic structure, and the Ancestry Constraint. Transactions of the Philological Society 99:2 223-245.
32. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2003. Directionality and locality in allomorphy: A response to Adger, Béjar, and Harbour. Transactions of the Philological Society 101:1 117-124.
33. Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum, eds., Readings in English transformational grammar, 184-221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
34. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, eds., The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, eds., Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89-156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A life in language, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
38. Chung, Inkie. 2007. Ecology of PF: A study of Korean phonology and morphology in a derivational approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
39. Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83:1, 8-42.
40. Dixon, R. M. W. 1976. Rapporteur's introduction. In R. M. W. Dixon, ed., Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 313-314. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
41. Dixon, R. M. W. 1977a. A grammar of Yidił. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Dixon, R. M. W. 1977b. Some phonological rules of Yidiny. Linguistic Inquiry 8:1 1-34.
43. Dixon, R. M. W. 2002. Australian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Dolbey, Andrew. 1997. Output optimization and cyclic allomorph selection. In Brian Agbayani and Sze-Wing Tang, eds., Proceedings of the 15th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 97-112. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
45. Embick, David. 1996. Causativization in Hupa. In Janice Johnson, Matthew Juge, and Jeri Moxley, eds., Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 22, 83-94. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Linguistics Society.
46. Embick, David. 1997. Voice and the interfaces of syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
47. Embick, David. 2000. Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry 31:2 185-230.
48. Embick, David. 2003. Locality, listedness, and morphological identity. Studia Linguistica 57:3 143-169.
49. Embick, David. 2004a. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35:3 355-392.
50. Embick, David. 2004b. Unaccusative syntax and verbal alternations. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Martin Everaert, eds., The unaccusativity puzzle, 137-158. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Embick, David. 2007a. Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25:1 1-37.
52. Embick, David. 2007b. Linearization and local dislocation: Derivational mechanics and interactions. Linguistic Analysis 33:3-4, 303-336.
53. Embick, David, and Morris Halle. 2005. On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken, and Haike Jacobs, eds., Romance languages and linguistic theory 2003, 59-88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
54. Embick, David, and Morris Halle. In preparation. The Latin conjugation. Ms., University of Pennsylvania and MIT.
55. Embick, David, and Alec Marantz. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39:1 1-53.
56. Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32:4 555-595.
57. Ernout, Alfred. 1952/1989. Morphologie historique du latin. 4th ed. Paris:Klincksieck.
58. Flora, Marie Jo Ann. 1974. Palauan phonology and morphology. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
59. Fulmer, Sandra Lee. 1997. Parallelism and planes in Optimality Theory: Evidence from Afar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.
60. Golla, Victor. 1970. Hupa grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
61. Hale, Kenneth. 1976a. Dja:bugay. In R. M. W. Dixon, ed., Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 321-326. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
62. Hale, Kenneth. 1976b. On ergative and locative su‰xal alternations in Australian languages. In R. M. W. Dixon, ed., Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 414-417. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
63. Hale, Kenneth. 1976c. Tya.pukay (Djaabugay). In Peter Sutton, ed., Languages of Cape York, 236-242. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
64. Hale, Kenneth, Jeanne LaVerne, and Paula Pranka. 1990. On suppletion, selection, and agreement. In Carol Georgopoulos and Roberta Ishihara, eds., Interdisciplinary approaches to language, 255-270. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
65. Halle, Morris. 1990. An approach to morphology. In Juli Carter, Rose-Marie Déchaine, Bill Philip, and Tim Sherer, eds., Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 20, 150-184. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
66. Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang, and Martha McGinnis, eds., PF: Papers at the interface, 425-449. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30. Cambridge, MA:MIT, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
67. Halle, Morris, and William J. Idsardi. 1995. General properties of stress and metrical structure. In John Goldsmith, ed., The handbook of phonological theory, 403-443. Oxford: Blackwell.
68. Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, eds., The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111-176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1994. Some key features of Distributed Morphology. In Papers on phonology and morphology, ed. by Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley, and Tony Bures, 275-288. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21. Cambridge, MA: MIT, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
70. Halle, Morris, and K. P. Mohanan. 1985. Segmental phonology of Modern English. Linguistic Inquiry 16:1 57-116.
71. Halle, Morris, and Bert Vaux. 1998. Theoretical aspects of Indo-European nominal morphology: The nominal declensions of Latin and Armenian. In Jay Jasanoff, H. Craig Melchert, and Lisi Oliver, Mír curad: Studies in honor of Calvert Watkins, 223-240. Innsbruck: Institut fü r Sprachwissenschaft der Universitä t Innsbruck.
72. Halle, Morris, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1987. An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73. Hargus, Sharon. 1993. Modeling the phonology-morphology interface. In Sharon Hargus and Ellen M. Kaisse, eds., Studies in Lexical Phonology, 45-71. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
74. Harley, Heidi. 2005. On the causative construction. Ms., University of Arizona.
75. Hayes, Bruce. 1982. Metrical structure as the organizing principle of Yidiny phonology. In Harry van der Hulst and Norval Smith, eds., The structure of phonological representations, 97-110. Dordrecht: Foris.
76. Idsardi, William J. 1992. The computation of prosody. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
77. Idsardi, William J. 2000. Clarifying opacity. The Linguistic Review 17:2-4, 337-350.
78. Inkelas, Sharon. 1993. Nimboran position class morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11:4 559-625.
79. Inkelas, Sharon, and C. Orhan Orgun. 1995. Level ordering and economy in the Lexical Phonology of Turkish. Language 71:4 763-793.
80. Jacobsen, Wesley M. 1992. The transitive structure of events in Japanese. Tokyo:Kurosio.
81. Josephs, Lewis S. 1975. Palauan reference grammar. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
82. Josephs, Lewis S. 1990. New Palauan-English dictionary. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
83. Kager, René. 1996. On a‰x allomorphy and syllable counting. In Ursula Kleinhenz, ed., Interfaces in phonology, 155-171. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
84. Kager, René. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Kenstowicz, Michael. 1996. Base-identity and uniform exponence: Alternatives to cyclicity. In Jacques Durand and Bernard Laks, eds., Current trends in phonology:Models and methods, 363-393. Salford: European Studies Research Institute.
86. Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical Morphology and Phonology. In Linguistic Society of Korea, ed., Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected essays from SICOL-1981, 3-91. Seoul: Hanshin.
87. Kiparsky, Paul. 1996. Allomorphy or morphophonology? In Rajendra Singh and Richard Desrochers, eds., Trubetzkoy's orphan, 13-31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
88. Kiparsky, Paul. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17:2-4, 351-366.
89. Kisseberth, Charles. 1970. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1:3 291-306.
90. Klein, Thomas B. 2003. Syllable structure and lexical markedness in creole morphophonology:Determiner allomorphy in Haitian and elsewhere. In Ingo Plag, ed., The phonology and morphology of creole languages, 209-228. Tübingen:Niemeyer.
91. Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.
92. Kratzer, Angelika. 1994. The event argument and the semantics of voice. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
93. Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring, eds., Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109-137. Dordrecht:Kluwer.
94. Kroch, Anthony. 1994. Morphosyntactic variation. In Katharine Beals et al., eds., CLS 30: Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 2, The Parasession on Variation and Linguistic Theory, 180-201. Chicago:University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.
95. Lapointe, Steven. 1999. Stem selection and OT. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, eds., Yearbook of morphology 1999, 263-297. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
96. Lewis, Charlton T., and Charles Short. 1969. A Latin dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
97. Lewis, Geoffrey. 1967. Turkish grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
98. Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. The organization of the lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
99. Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
100. Łubowicz, Anna. 2005. Opaque allomorphy in OT. In Donald Baumer, David Montero, and Michael Scanlon, eds., Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 261-269. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
101. Maiden, Martin. 2004. Morphological autonomy and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology 2004, 137-175.
102. Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
103. Marantz, Alec. 1988. Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. In Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan, eds., Theoretical morphology, 253-270. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
104. Marantz, Alec. 1995. A late note on late insertion. In Young-Sun Kim et al., eds., Explorations in generative grammar, 357-368. Seoul: Hankuk.
105. Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Alexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark, and Alexander Williams, eds., Proceedings of the 21st Penn Linguistics Colloquium, 201-225. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics.
106. Marantz, Alec. 2001. Words and things. Handout, MIT.
107. Marantz, Alec. 2007. Phases and words. In Sook-Hee Choe, ed., Phases in the theory of grammar, 199-222. Seoul: Dong In.
108. Marlett, Stephen, and Joseph Stemberger. 1983. Empty consonants in Seri. Linguistic Inquiry 14:4 617-639.
109. Marvin, Tatjana. 2002. Topics in the stress and syntax of words. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
110. Mascaró, Joan. 2007. External allomorphy and lexical representation. Linguistic Inquiry 38:4 715-735.
111. McCarthy, John. 2002. A thematic guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
112. McCarthy, John. 2005. Optimal paradigms. In Laura Downing, Tracy Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen, eds., Paradigms in phonological theory, 170-210. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
113. McCarthy, John. 2008. The serial interaction of stress and syncope. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26:3 499-546.
114. McCarthy, John, and Alan Prince. 1993. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Technical Report a3. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.
115. McCarthy, John, and Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Jill Beckman, Suzanne Urbanczyk, and Laura Walsh Dickey, eds., Papers in Optimality Theory, 249-384. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
116. McIntosh, Mary. 1984. Fulfulde syntax and verbal morphology. Boston: Kegan Paul.
117. Meiser, Gerhard. 1998. Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
118. Meiser, Gerhard. 2003. Veni vidi vici: Die Vorgeschichte des lateinischen Perfektsystems. Munich: C. H. Beck.
119. Mester, R. Armin. 1994. The quantitative trochee in Latin. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12:1 1-61.
120. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1994. (S)ase as an elsewhere causative and the syntactic nature of words. In Program of the Conference on Theoretical Linguistics and Japanese Language Teaching, 61-76. Tsuda University.
121. Nash, David. 1979. Yidiny stress: A metrical account. In Edwin Battistella, ed., Proceedings of North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 9, 112-130. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
122. Niedermann, Max. 1908. Une loi rythmique proéthnique en latin. In Mélanges de linguistique offerts áM. Ferdinand de Saussure. Librairie de la Société de Linguistique de Paris. Geneva: Slatkine Reprints edition, 43-57.
123. Noyer, Rolf. 1993. Mobile a‰xes in Huave: Optimality and morphological wellformedness. In Erin Duncan, Donka Farkas, and Philip Spaelti, eds., Proceedings of the Twelfth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 67-82. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
124. Noyer, Rolf. 1997. Features, positions and a‰xes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland.
125. Noyer, Rolf. 1998. Impoverishment Theory and morphosyntactic markedness. In Steven Lapointe, Diane Brentari, and Patrick Farrell, eds., Morphology and its relation to syntax and phonology, 264-285. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
126. Odden, David. 1993. Interaction between modules in Lexical Phonology. In Sharon Hargus and Ellen M. Kaisse, eds., Phonetics and phonology 4: Studies in Lexical Phonology, 111-144. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
127. Oltra-Massuet, Isabel. 1999. On the notion of theme vowel: A new approach to Catalan verbal morphology. Master's thesis, MIT.
128. Oltra-Massuet, Isabel, and Karlos Arregi. 2005. Stress by structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 36:1 43-84.
129. Orgun, C. Orhan, and Andrew Dolbey. 2007. Phonology-morphology interaction in a constraint-based framework. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss, eds., The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 103-124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
130. Pak, Marjorie. 2008. The postsyntactic derivation and its phonological reflexes. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
131. Paster, Mary. 2006. Phonological conditions on a‰xation. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
132. Patz, Elizabeth. 1991. Djabugay. In Barry J. Blake and R. M. W. Dixon, eds., The handbook of Australian languages, vol. 4, 245-347. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
133. Pesetsky, David. 1979. Russian morphology and lexical theory. Ms., MIT.
134. Poser, William J. 1992. Blocking of phrasal constructions by lexical items. In Ivan Sag and Anna Szabolcsi, eds., Lexical matters, 111-130. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
135. Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.
136. Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
137. Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.
138. Siegel, Dorothy. 1978. The Adjacency Constraint and the theory of morphology. In M. J. Stein, ed., Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 8, 189-197. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Assocation.
139. Smyth, Herbert Weir. 1920. Greek grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
140. Sommer, Ferdinand. 1914. Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre. Heidelberg:Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.
141. Sproat, Richard. 1985. On deriving the lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
142. Svenonius, Peter. To appear. Spatial P in English. In Guglielmo Cinque and Luigi Rizzi, eds., The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
143. Vaux, Bert. 2003. Syllabification in Armenian, Universal Grammar, and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 34:1 91-125.
144. Wagner, Michael. 2005. Prosody and recursion. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
145. Williams, Edwin. 1981. On the notions lexically related and head of a word. Linguistic Inquiry 12:2 245-274.
146. Wolf, Matthew. 2008. Optimal interleaving: Serial morphology-phonology interaction in a constraint-based model. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
147. Yu, Alan. 2004. The morphology and phonology of infixation. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.