Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations

Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-37

  Embick, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847647967     PISSN: 0167806X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11049-006-9002-9     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bhatt, R., & Pancheva, R. (2004). Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, 35(1), 1-45.
3. Bobaljik, J. (1994). What does adjacency do? In H. Harley & C. Phillips (Eds.), The morphology-syntax connection (pp. 1-32). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL 21.
4. Bresnan, J. (1973). The syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 275-343.
5. Bresnan, J. (1999). Explaining morphosyntactic competition. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 1-44). Oxford: Blackwell.
6. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. di Sciullo, A. M., & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Embick, D. (2000). Features, syntax and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(2), 185-230.
9. Embick, D. (2003). Locality, listedness, and morphological information. Studia Linguistica, 57(3), 143-169.
10. Embick, D. (2005). Linearization and local dislocation: Derivational mechanics and interactions to appear in Linguistic Analysis.
11. Embick, D., & Halle, M. (2005). On the status of stems in morphological theory. In T. Geerts & H. Jacobs (Eds.), Proceedings of going romance 2003 (pp. 59-88) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Embick, D., & Halle, M. (forthcoming) Distributed morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
13. Embick, D., & Marantz, A. (2006). Architecture and blocking. ms., University of Pennsylvania and MIT.
14. Embick, D., & Noyer, R. (2001). Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(4), 555-595.
15. Fox, D., & Pesetsky, D. (2005). Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics, 31, 1-45.
16. Giegerich, H. (2001). Synonymy blocking and the elsewhere condition: Lexical morphology and the speaker. Transactions of the Philological Society, 99(1), 65-98.
17. Halle, M. (1997). Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 30, 425-449.
18. Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111-176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Hankamer, J., & Mikkelsen, L. (2005). When movement must be blocked: A response to Embick and Noyer. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), 85-125.
20. Heim, I. (2000). Degree operators and scope. In B. Jackson & T. Matthews (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT X. (pp. 40-64). Cornell University, Ithaca: CLC Publications.
21. Kennedy, C. (1997). Comparison and polar opposition. In A. Lawson (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT 7 (pp. 240-257). Ithaca: CLC Publications.
22. Kennedy, C. (1999). Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Garland.
23. Kennedy, C. (2001). Polar opposition and the ontology of "degrees". Linguistics and Philosophy, 24, 33-70.
24. Kennedy, C. (2002). Comparative deletion and optimality in syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20(3), 553-621.
25. Kiparsky, P. (2005). Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms. Yearbook of Morphology, 2004, 113-135.
26. Kroch, A. (1994). Morphosyntactic variation. In K. Beals (Ed.), Papers from the 30th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on variation and linguistic theory (pp. 180-201). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
27. Lechner, W. (1999). Comparatives and DP-Structure. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
28. Lechner, W. (2004). Ellipsis in comparatives. Berlin: de Gruyter.
29. Marantz, A. (1984). On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Marantz, A. (1988). Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. In M. Hammond & M. Noonan (Eds.), Theoretical morphology (pp. 253-270) San Diego: Academic Press.
31. Marantz, A. (1995). A late note on late insertion. In Explorations in generative grammar (pp. 357-368). Seoul: Hankuk Publishing.
32. Marantz, A. (2001). Words and things. Handout, MIT.
33. Marantz, A. (2003). Blocking. Handout, MIT.
34. McCawley, J. D. (1988). The syntactic phenomena of English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Newell, H. (2004). A late adjunction solution to bracketing paradoxes. Paper presented at NELS 35.
36. Pesetsky, D. (1979). Russian morphology and lexical theory. ms., MIT.
37. Pesetsky, D. (1985). Morphology and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 193-246.
38. Poser, W. J. (1992). Blocking of phrasal constructions by lexical items. In I. Sag & A. Szabolsci (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp. 111-130). Stanford: CSLI.
39. Richards, N. (2002). A distinctness condition on linearization. ms., MIT.
40. Speyer, A. (2005). Bracketing paradoxes as cases of word-internal adjunction. ms., University of Pennsylvania.
41. Sproat, R. (1985). On Deriving the lexicon. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
42. Williams, E. (2004). Dumping lexicalism. to appear In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces.