Preface to the anniversary edition

The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology: Anniversary Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Bijker, Wiebe ^a,b   Pinch, Trevor ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b University of York ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895568577     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (84)

1. Alac, M. 2009. "Moving android: On social robots and body-in-interaction." Social Studies of Science 39(4): 491-528.
2. Barad, K. 2003. "Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs 28(3): 801-831.
3. Beunza, D., and Stark, D. 2004. "Tools of the trade: The socio-technology of arbitrage in a Wall Street trading room." Industrial and Corporate Change 13(2): 369-400.
4. Bijker, W. E. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
5. Bijker, W. E. 2003. "The need for public intellectuals: A space for STS." Science, Technology & Human Values 28(4): 443-450.
6. Bijker, W. E. 2010. "How is technology made? That is the question!" Cambridge Journal of Economics 34(1): 63-76.
7. Bijker, W. E., Bal, R., and Hendriks, R. 2009. The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
8. Bijker, W. E., and Law, J., eds. 1992. Shaping Technology / Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
9. Bijsterveld, K. 2008. Mechanical Sound: Technology, Culture, and Public Problems of Noise in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
10. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., and Barthe, Y. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
11. Callon, M., and Latour, B. 1992. "Don't throw the baby out with the bath school!" A reply to Collins and Yearley, in Science as Practice and Culture, A. Pickering, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 343-368.
12. Carlson, B. W. 1991. Innovation as a Social Process: Elihu Thomson and the Rise of General Electric, 1870-1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Collins, H. M. 1983. "An empirical relativist programme in the sociology of scientific knowledge," in Science Observed, K. D. Knorr Cetina and M. Mulkay, eds. Beverly Hills: Sage, 85-114.
14. Collins, H. M. 2010. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Collins, H. M., and Evans, R. 2002. "The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience." Social Studies of Science 32(2): 235-296.
16. Collins, H. M., and Evans, R. 2003. "King Canute meets the Beach Boys: Responses to the third wave." Social Studies of Science 33(3): 435-452.
17. Collins, H. M., and Pinch, T. J. 2007. "Who is to blame for the Challenger explosion?" Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 38: 254-255.
18. Collins, H. M., and Yearley, S. 1992. "Epistemological chicken," in Science as Practice and Culture, A. Pickering, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 301-326.
19. Coopmans, C. 2011. "Face value: New medical imaging software in commercial view." Social Studies of Science 41(2): 155-176.
20. Feenberg, A. 2006. "Symmetry, asymmetry, and the real possibility of radical change: Reply to Kochan." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37: 721-727.
21. Feenberg, A. 2010. Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
22. Forman, P. 2007. "The primacy of science in modernity, of technology in postmodernity, and of ideology in the history of technology." History and Technology: An International Journal 23(1): 1-152.
23. Garud, R., and Ahlstrom, D. 1997. "Technology assessment: a socio-cognitive perspective." Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 14: 25-48.
24. Garud, R., and Karnoe, P. 2001. Path Dependence and Creation. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
25. Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
26. Gorman, M. E. 2010. Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
27. Harremoës, P., Gee, D., MacGarvin, M., Stirling, A., Wynne, B., and Vaz, S. G., eds. 2002. The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings. London: Earthscan Publications and European Environment Agency.
28. Hecht, G. 1998. The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
29. Hecht, G. 2011. Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
30. Hommels, A. 2005. Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
31. Hommels, A., Peters, P., and Bijker, W. E. 2007. "Techno therapy or nurtured niches? Technology studies and the evaluation of radical innovations." Research Policy 36(7): 1088-1099.
32. Hughes, T. P. 1998. Rescuing Prometheus. New York: Pantheon Books.
33. Hughes, T. P. 2004. Human-Built World: How to Think about Technology and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Hughes, T. P., Hughes, A. C., Allen, M. T., and Hecht, G. 2001. Technologies of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
35. Ihde, Don. 1979. Technics and Praxis. Dordrecht: Reidel.
36. Jasanoff, S. 2003. "Breaking the waves in science studies: Comment on H. M. Collins and Robert Evans, 'The Third Wave of Science Studies.'" Social Studies of Science 33(3): 389-400.
37. Jasanoff, S., ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. New York: Routledge.
38. Johnson, D. G., and Wetmore, J. M. 2009. Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
39. Knorr Cetina, K., and Bruegger, U. 2000. "The market as an object of attachment: Exploring postsocial relations in financial markets." The Canadian Journal of Sociology 25(2): 141-168.
40. Kochan, J. 2006. "Feenberg and STS: Counter-reflections on bridging the gap." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37: 702-720.
41. Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
42. Latour, B. 1999. Pandora's Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
43. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (ANT). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Latour, B., and Yaneva, A. 2008. "Give me a gun and I will make all buildings move: An ANT's view of architecture," in Explorations in Architecture: Teaching, Design, Research, R. Geiser, ed. Basel: Birkhäuser, 80-89.
45. Law, J. 2002. Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
46. Law, J., and Hassard, J., eds. 1999. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
47. Leonardi, P. M. 2010. "From road to lab to math: The co-evolution of technological, regulatory, and organizational innovations for automotive crash testing." Social Studies of Science 40(2): 243-274.
48. MacKenzie, D. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Finance Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
49. MacKenzie, D., and Spinardi, G. 1995. "Tacit knowledge and the uninvention of nuclear weapons," in Knowing Machines: Essays on Technical Change, D. MacKenzie, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 215-260.
50. MacKenzie, D. S., and Spinardi, G. 1988. "The shaping of nuclear weapon system technology: US fleet ballistic missile guidance and navigation: 1: From Polaris to Poseidon." Social Studies of Science 18: 419-463.
51. MacKenzie, D., and Wajcman, J., eds. 1985. The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator Got Its Hum. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
52. Mayntz, R., and Hughes, T. P., eds. 1988. The Development of Large Technical Systems. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
53. McCarthy, E., and Kelty, C. 2010. "Responsibility and nanotechnology." Social Studies of Science 40(3): 405-432.
54. Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
55. Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., and Callon, M. 2007. "An introduction to market devices." The Sociological Review 55: 1-12.
56. Nowotny, H. 2008. Insatiable Curiosity: Innovation in a Fragile Future. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
57. Orlikowski, W. 1992. "The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations." Organization Science 3: 397-427.
58. Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Pinch, T. 1996. "Social construction of technology: A review," in Technological Change: Methods and Themes in the History of Technology, R. Fox, ed. Amsterdam: Harwood, 17-36.
60. Pinch, T. 2010. "On making infrastructure visible: Putting the non-humans to rights." Cambridge Journal of Economics 34(1): 77-89.
61. Pinch, T., and Bijsterveld, K., eds. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Pinch, T., and Svedberg, R., eds. 2008. Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
63. Pinch, T., and Trocco, F. 2002. Analog Days. The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer. Cambridge. Mass.: Harvard University Press.
64. Rip, A. 2003. "Constructing expertise: In a third wave of science studies?" Social Studies of Science 33(3): 419-434.
65. Rothschild, J., ed. 1983. Machina Ex Dea: Feminist Perspectives on Technology. New York: Pergamon.
66. Rottenburg, R. 2009. Far-Fetched Facts: A Parable of Development Aid. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
67. Shrum, W., Genuth, J., and Chompalov, I. 2007. Structures of Scientific Collaboration. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
68. Smith, M. R., and Marx, L., eds. 1995. Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, second edition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
69. Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Summerton, J., ed. 1994. Changing Large Technical Systems. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
71. Swierstra, T., van Est, R., and Boenink, M. 2009. "Taking care of the symbolic order: How converging technologies challenge our concepts. Nanoethics 3: 269-280.
72. Thompson, E. 2004. The Soundscape of Modernity. Architectural Acoustics and the Culture of Listening in America, 1900-1933. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
73. Verbeek, P.-P. 2005. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
74. Visvanathan, S. 1998. "A celebration of difference: Science and democracy in India." Science 280(5360): 42-43.
75. Winner, L. 1991. "Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology," in The Technology of Discovery and the Discovery of Technology: Proceedings of The 6th International Conference of The Society for Philosophy and Technology, C. Pitt and E. Lugo, eds. Blacksburg, Va.: Society for Philosophy and Technology, 503-519.
76. Winner, L. 1993. "Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology." Science, Technology, & Human Values 18(3): 362-378.
77. Woodhouse, E., Hess, D., Breyman, S., and Martin, B. 2002. "Science studies and activism: Possibilities and problems for reconstructivist agendas." Social Studies of Science 32(2): 297-319.
78. Woolgar, S. 1991. "The turn to technology in social studies of science." Science, Technology, and Human Values 16(1): 20-50.
79. Wyatt, S. 2008. "Technological determinism is dead; long live technological determinism," in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, third edition, E. J. Hacket, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 165-180.
80. Wynne, B. 2003. "Seasick on the third wave? Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism: Response to Collins and Evans (2002)." Social Studies of Science 33(3): 401-417.
81. Wynne, B., Felt, U., Callon, M., Gonçalves, M. E., Jasanoff, S., Jepsen, M., et al. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Brussels: Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission.
82. Yates, J., and Orlikowski, W. J. 1992. "Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media." The Academy of Management Review 17(2): 299-326.
83. Zuiderent-Jerak, T. 2010. "Embodied interventions, interventions on bodies: Experiments in practices of science and technology studies and hemophilia care." Science, Technology & Human Values 35(5): 677-710.
84. Zuiderent-Jerak, T., Strating, M., Nieboer, A., and Bal, R. 2009. "Sociological refigurations of patient safety; ontologies of improvement and 'acting with' quality collaboratives in healthcare." Social Science & Medicine 69(12): 1713-1721.