Embodied interventions-interventions on bodies: Experiments in practices of science and technology studies and hemophilia care

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 677-710

  Zuiderent Jerak, Teun ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

compliance; hemophilia care; intervention; normativity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955730049     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243909337119     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Bal, R., and F. Mastboom. 2007. Engaging with technologies in practice: Travelling the North-west passage. Science as Culture 16 (3):253-66.
2. Berg, M. 1997. Rationalizing medical work: Decision-support techniques and medical practices. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Berg, M. 1998. The politics of technology: On bringing social theory into technological design. Science, Technology, & Human Values 23 (4):456-90.
4. Bloor, D. 1976. Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5. Blume, S. 2000. Land of hope and glory; exploring cochlear implantation in the Netherlands. Science, Technology, & Human Values 25 (2):139-66.
6. Borst-Eilers, E. 1999. Beleidsvisie hemofilie. Den Haag, Ministery van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport, 6.
7. Callon, M., and V. Rabeharisoa. 2004. Gino's lesson on humanity; genetics, mutual entanglements and the sociologist's role. Economy and Society 33 (1):1-27.
8. Campbell, N., and V. Eubanks. 2004. Making sense of imbrication: Popular technology and 'inside-out' methodologies. Toronto, ON: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference2004.
9. Charney, E. 1975. Compliance and prescribance. Am J Dis Child 129 (9):1009-10.
10. Clark, A. 1991. Social worlds/arena theory as organizational theory. In Social organization and social process; Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss, ed. D. R. Maines. New York, Aldine De Gruyter: 119-57.
11. Clark, A. 1997. A social worlds research adventure; The case of reproductive science. Grounded theory in practice, eds. A. L. Strauss and J. M. Corbin. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE: 63-94.
12. Collins, H. 1990. Captives and victims; Comments on Scott, Richards and Martin. Science, Technology, & Human Values 16 (2):249-51.
13. Collins, H. 2004. Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (2):125-43.
14. Collins, H.M. 1984. Researching spoonbending: concepts and practice of participatory fieldwork. In Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice, eds. C. Bell and H. Roberts, 54-69. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
15. Conein, B., N. Dodier, and L. Thévenot. 1993. Les objects dans l'action; De la maison au laboratoire. Paris: Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.
16. Conrad, P. 1985. The meaning of medications; Another look at compliance. Social Science & Medicine 20 (1):29-37.
17. de Wilde, R. 1996. Ironies of the eighth day; Reflections on the modern faith in the compatibility of community, democracy, and technology. Bielefeld: 4S/EASST.
18. Dodier, N. 1998. Clinical practice and procedures in occupational medicine: A study of the framing of individuals. In Differences in medicine, eds. M. Berg and A. Mol, 53-85. Durham: Duke University Press.
19. Downey, G.L., and J. Dumit. 1997a. Cyborgs & citadels: Anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
20. Downey, G.L., and J. Dumit. 1997b. Locating and intervening; An introduction. In Cyborgs & citadels: Anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies, eds. G. L. Downey and J. Dumit, 5-29. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
21. Downey, G.L., and J.C. Lucena. 1997. Engineering selves. In Cyborgs & citadels; Anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies, eds. G. L. Downey and J. Dumit. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press: 117-42.
22. Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ''Mode 2'' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29 (2):109-23.
23. Forsythe, D.E. 1996. New bottles, old wine; Hidden cultural assumptions in a computerized explanation system for migraine sufferers. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 10 (4):551-74.
24. Fortun, K. 2001. Advocacy after Bhopal; Environmentalism, Disaster, New World Orders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE.
26. Giles, J. 2006. Sociologist fools physics judges. Nature 2006 (442):8.
27. Gomart, E. 2002. Methadone; Six effects in search of a substance. Social Studies of Science 32 (1):93-135.
28. Guthman, J., and M. DuPuis. 2006. Embodying neoliberalism: economy, culture, and the politics of fat. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (3):427-48.
29. Haraway, D.J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women; The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
30. Haraway, D.J. 2004. The Haraway reader. New York: Routledge.
31. Hess, D. 1997. If you're thinking of living in STS; A guide for the perplexed. In Cyborgs & Citadels; Anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies, eds. G. L. Downey and J. Dumit. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
32. Hess, D. 2001. Ethnography and the development of science and technology studies. In Handbook of ethnography, eds. P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, L. Lofland and J. Lofland. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE.
33. Jensen, C. Bruun. 2007. Sorting attachments; On intervention and usefulness in STS and health policy. Science as Culture 16 (3): 237-51.
34. Jensen, C. Bruun. 2008. Sociology, systems and (patient) safety; knowledge translations in healthcare policy. Sociology of Health & Illness 30 (2): 309-24.
35. Jones, P. 1984. Living with Haemophilia. Lancaster: MTP Press Limited.
36. Keulartz, J., M. Schermer, M. Korthals, and T. Swierstra. 2004. Ethics in technological culture; A programmatic proposal for a pragmatist approach. Science, Technology, & Human Values 29 (1):3-29.
37. Latour, B. 2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 30 (2):225-48.
38. Law, J. 2004. Matter-ing: Or how might STS contribute?. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/sociology/papers/law-matter-ing.pdf (accessed May 7, 2007).
39. Mannucci, P.M. 2003. Hemophilia: Treatment options in the twenty-first century. J Thromb Haemost 1 (7):1349-55.
40. Markussen, R. 1996. Politics of intervention in design; feminist reflections on the scandinavian tradition. AI & Society 10 (2):127-41.
41. Martin, B. 1993. The critique of science becomes academic. Science, Technology, & Human Values 18 (2):247-59.
42. Martin, B. 1996. Sticking a needle into science; The case of polio vaccines and the origin of AIDS. Social Studies of Science 26 (2):245-76.
43. Martin, B., E. Richards, and P. Scott. 1991. Who's a captive? Who's a victim? Response to Collins's method talk. Science, Technology, & Human Values 16 (2):252-5.
44. McDonald, H., A. Garg, and B. Haynes. 2002. Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions. Journal of the American Medical Association 288 (22):2868-79.
45. Mol, A. 2002. The body multiple; ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
46. Mouffe, C. 2000. The democratic paradox. London, New York: Verso.
47. Pasveer, B. 1992. Shadows of knowledge-Making a representing practice in medicine; X-ray pictures and pulmonary tuberculosis, 1895-1930. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
48. Scott, P., E. Richards, and B. Martin. 1990. Captives of controversy: The myth of the neutral social researcher in contemporary scientific controversies. Science, Technology, & Human Values 15 (4):474-94.
49. Star, S.L., and A. Strauss. 1999. Layers of silence, arenas of voice; The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 (1): 9-30.
50. Steen Carlsson, K., S. Hojgard, A. Glomstein, S. Lethagen, S. Schulman, L. Tengborn, A. Lindgren, E. Berntorp, and B. Lindgren. 2003. On-demand vs. prophylactic treatment for severe haemophilia in Norway and Sweden: Differences in treatment characteristics and outcome. Haemophilia 9 (5):555-66.
51. Strathern, M. 1991. Partial connections. Savage, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
52. Suchman, L. 1995. Representations of work; Making work visible. Communications of the ACM 38 (9):56-64.
53. Suchman, L. 2000. Making a case; 'knowledge' and 'routine' work in knowledge production. In Workplace studies: recovering work practice and informing system design, eds. P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh and C. Heath, 29-45. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Suchman, L., and R. Trigg. 1992. Understanding practice: Video as a medium for reflection and design. In Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems, 65-90. Edited by Joan Greenbaum and Morten Kyng. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
55. Thévenot, L. 1993. Essai sur les objets usuels. In Les objets dans l'action; De la maison au laboratoire, eds. B. Conein, N. Dodier and L. Thévenot. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales: 85-111.
56. van der Ploeg, I. 2001. Prosthetic bodies. The construction of the fetus and the couple as patients in reproductive technologies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
57. van Houten, D.J. 2000. Disability and citizenship: Empowerment of marginals. In Approaching a new milennium. Lessons from the past, prospects for the future, eds. D. Apollon, O. B. Fure and L. Sråsand. Bergen: University of Bergen.
58. Willems, D. 1995. Tools of care; Explorations into the semiotics of medical technology. PhD Diss., University of Maastricht, Maastricht.
59. Willems, D. 2000. Managing one's body using self-management techniques; Practicing autonomy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):23-38.
60. Willems, D. 2001. Dokters en patiënten in kleine medische technologie. In Ingebouwde normen, medische technieken doorgelicht, eds. M. Berg and A. Mol, 61-70. Utrecht: Van der Wees.
61. Woodhouse, E., D. Hess, S. Breyman, and B. Martin. 2002. Science studies and activism; Possibilities and problems for reconstructivist agendas. Social Studies of Science 32 (2):297-319.
62. Woodhouse, E., and J.W. Patton. 2004. Special issue on STS and the social shaping of design. Design Issues 20 (3):1-80.
63. Woolgar, S. 1983. Irony in the social studies of science. In Science observed, eds. K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay. Beverly Hills: SAGE:239-66.
64. Woolgar, S., C. Coopmans, D. Neyland, and E. Simakova. 2005. Does STS Mean Business 2?. http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/news/archives/Main/Does+STS+Mean+Business+2.htm (accessed April 18, 2007).
65. Woolgar, S., D. Neyland, C. Coopmans, and E. Simakova. 2004. Does STS Mean Business?. http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/news/archives/Main/Does+STS+Mean+Business.htm (accessed April 18, 2007).
66. Wouters, P., and A. Beaulieu. 2007. Critical accountability; Dilemma's for interventionist studies of e-science. Journal of Computer-Mediated Cummunication 12 (2):583-99.
67. Zuiderent, T. 2002. Blurring the Center; On the politics of ethnography. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14 (2):59-78.
68. Zuiderent-Jerak, T., and C. Bruun Jensen. 2007. Unpacking 'Intervention' in Science and Technology Studies. Science as Culture 16 (3):227-35.