Improved model calculation of atmospheric CO2 increment in affecting carbon stock of tropical mangrove forest

Tellus, Series B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-11

  Ray, Raghab ^a   Chowdhury, Chumki ^a   Majumder, Natasha ^a   Dutta, Manab Kumar ^a   Mukhopadhyay, Sandip Kumar ^a   Jana, Tapan Kumar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA   (India)

Author keywords

Box model; Carbon stock; India; Mangrove forest

Indexed keywords

ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; ATMOSPHERIC DYNAMICS; BELOWGROUND BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); MANGROVE; ORGANIC CARBON; ATMOSPHERE-BIOSPHERE INTERACTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TROPICAL FOREST;

SUNDARBANS; BAY OF BENGAL; INDIA; INDIAN OCEAN; SUNDARBANS NATIONAL PARK; WEST BENGAL;

AVICENNIA;

EID: 84894885720     PISSN: 02806509     EISSN: 16000889     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.18981     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. 2 increment and climate: evidence for stability and change in role of the tropical and boreal-temperate zone. Chemosphere. 59, 1595-1612.
2. Alongi, D. M. 2009. The Energetics of Mangrove Forest. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherland, pp. 11, 24.
3. Barrett, K. 1998. Oceanic ammonia emissions in the Europe and their trans boundary fluxes. Atmos. Environ. 32, 381-391.
4. Bartlett, K. B., Bartlett, D. S., Harris, R. C. and Sebacher, D. I. 1987. Methane emission along a salt marsh salinity gradient. Biogeochemistry. 4, 183-202.
5. Berger, U., Rivera-Monroy, V. H., Doyle, T. W., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Duke, N. C. and co-authors. 2008. Advances and limitations of individual based models to analyze and predict dynamics of mangrove forest: a review. Aquat. Bot. 89, 260-274.
6. 2 over Phanerozoic time. Am. J. Sci. 294, 56-91.
7. Biswas, H., Mukhopadhyay, S. K., De, T. K., Sen, S. and Jana, T. K. 2004. Biogenic controls on the air-water carbon dioxide exchange in the Sundarban mangrove environment, of Bay of Bengal, India. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49(1), 95-101.
8. Bouillon, S., Borges, A. V., Castafieda-Moya, E., Diele, K., Dittmar, T. and co-authors. 2008a. Mangrove production and carbon sinks: a revision of global budget estimates. Glob. Biogeochem. Cy. 22(GB2013), 12. DOI: 10.1029/2007GB003052.
9. Bouillon, S., Connolly, R. M. and Lee, S. Y. 2008b. Organic matter exchange and cycling in mangrove ecosystem; recent in sights from stable isotope studies. J. Sea. Res. 59, 44-58.
10. 2 enhances biological contributions to elevation change in coastal wetlands by offsetting stressors associated with sea-level rise. J. Ecol. 97, 67-77.
11. Chmura, G. L., Anisfeld, S. C., Cahoon, D. R. and Lynch, J. C. 2003. Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Glob. Biogeochem. Cy. 17(4), 1111. DOI: 10.1029/2002 GB001917.
12. 2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Glob. Change. Biol. 7, 357-373.
13. 2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia. 113, 299-313.
14. Dewar, R. C. 1991. An analytical model of carbon storage in the trees. Tree Physiol. 8, 239-258.
15. Donato, D. C., Kauffman, J. B., Murdiyarso, D., Kurnianto, S., Stidham, M. and co-authors. 2011. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nature. Geoscience. 4, 93-297.
16. Enquist, B. J., Economo, E. P., Huxman, T. E., Allen, A. P., Ignace, D. D. and co-authors. 2003. Scaling metabolism from organisms to ecosystems. Nature. 423, 639-642.
17. Frost, B. W. and Franzen, N. C. 1992. Grazing and iron limitation in the control of phytoplankton stock and nutrient concentration: a chemostat analogue of the Pacific equatorial upwelling zone. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 83, 291-303.
18. 4 in a tropical mangrove forest canopy. Atmos. Environ. 42, 4172-4184.
19. Ganguly, D., Dey, M., Sen, S. and Jana, T. K. 2009. Biosphere-Atmosphere exchange of NOx in the tropical mangrove forest. J. Geophys. Res. 114, G04014. DOI: 10.1029/2008JG000852.
20. Gattuso, P., Prakignoulle, M. and Wollast, R. 1998. Carbon and carbonate metabolism in coastal aquatic ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 405-434.
21. Ghosh, A., Dey, N., Bera, A., Tiwari, A., Sathyaniranjan, K. B. and co-authors. 2010. Culture independent molecular analysis of bacterial communities in the mangrove sediment of Sundarban, India. Saline. Syst. 6, 1.
22. Gilman, E. L., Ellison, J., Duke, N. C. and Field, C. 2008. Threats to mangroves from climate change and adaptation options. Aquat. Bot. 89, 237-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.009.
23. Giri, C., Ochieng, E., Tieszen, L. L., Zhu, Z., Singh, A. and coauthors. 2011. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 154-159.
24. Golder, D. G. 1972. Relations among stability parameters in the surface layer. BLM. 3, 47-58.
25. Grace, J., Malli, Y., Higuchi, N. and Meir, P. 2001. Productivity of tropical forest. In: Terrestrial Global Productivity (eds. J. Roy, B. Samgier and H. A. Mooney). Academic press, San Diego, pp. 401-426.
26. Heidam, N. Z. 1982. Atmospheric aerosol factor models, mass and missing data. Atmos. Environ. 16, 1923-1931.
27. Hutchings, P. and Saenger, P. 1987. Ecology of Mangroves. University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, p. 388.
28. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. 2009. Global Change. Stockholm, Sweden, Issue 74, p. 15.
29. Lewis, S. L., Lopwz-Gongalez, G., Sonke, B., Affum-Buffoe, K., Baker, R. T. and co-authors. 2009. Increasing carbon storage in intact African tropical forests. Nature. 457, 1003-1006.
30. 2 enrichment experiment and eddy-covariance measurements. Ecol. Appl. 11, 239-252.
31. Luo, Y., White, L. W., Canadell, J. G., DeLucia, E. H., Ellsworth, D. S. and co-authors. 2003. Sustainability of terrestrial carbon sequestration: A case study in Duke Forest with inversion approach. Global Biogeochem. Cy. 17(1). DOI: 10.1029/ 2002GB001923.
32. Luo, Z., Jianxin Sun, O., Wang, E., Ren, H. and Xu, H. 2010. Modeling productivity in mangrove forests as impacted by effective soil water availability and its sensitivity to climate change using Biome-BGC. Ecosystems. 13, 949-965.
33. Mandal, S. K., Majumder, N., Chowdhury, C., Ganguly, D., Dey, M. and co-authors. 2011. Adsorption kinetic control of As (III & V) mobilization and sequestration by Mangrove sediment. Environ. Earth. Sci. 65, 2027-2036. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-011-1183-9.
34. 2FIX V.2 approach. Ecol. Model. 64, 177-199.
35. Mery, G. and Kanninen, M. 1999. Forest plantations and carbon sequestration in Chile. In: Forest Transitions and Carbon Fluxes, Global Scenarios and Policies (ed. M. Palo). World Development Studies 15. United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economy Research (UNU/WIDER), Helsinki, pp. 74-100.
36. Miller, P. C. 1972. Bioclimate, leaf temperature, and primary production in red mangrove canopies in south Florida. Ecology. 53, 22-45.
37. Mukhopadhyay, S. K., Biswas, H., De, T. K. and Jana, T. K. 2006. Fluxes of nutrients from the tropical River Hooghly at the land-ocean boundary of Sundarbans, NE Coast of Bay of Bengal, India. J. Mar. Syst. 62, 9-21.
38. Mukhopadhyay, S. K., Biswas, H., De, T. K., Sen, B. K., Sen, S. and co-authors. 2002. Impact of Sundarban mangrove biosphere on the carbon dioxide and methane mixing ratios at the NE Coast of Bay of Bengal, India. Atmos. Environ. 36, 629-638.
39. 2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102, 18052-18056.
40. 2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant. Cell. Environ. 22, 683-714.
41. Phillips, O. L., Malhi, Y., Higuchi, N., Laurance, W. F., Nunez, P. V. and co-authors. 1998. Changes in the carbon balance of tropical forests: Evidence from long-term plots. Science. 282, 439-442.
42. Pruppacher, H. R. and Klett, J. D. 1997. Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation. Kluwer Academic, Netherlands.
43. Ray, R., Ganguly, D., Chowdhury, C., Dey, M., Das, S. and co-authors. 2011. Carbon sequestration and annual increase of carbon stock in a mangrove forest. Atmos. Environ. 45, 5016-5024.
44. Rodhe, H. and Bjorkstrom, A. 1979. Some consequence of nonproportionality between fluxes and reservoir contents in natural systems. Tellus. 31, 269-278.
45. ScienceDaily. 2007. How Will Climate Change Affect India's Monsoon Season? 7 March. Online at: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070308121808.htm.
46. Sherman, R. E., Fahey, T. J. and Martinez, P. 2003. Spatial patterns of biomass and above ground net primary productivity in a mangrove ecosystem in the Dominican Republic. Ecosystems. 6, 384-398.
47. 2-fertilized vegetation on future global climate and carbon dynamics. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31(23), Art. No. L23211.
48. Twilley, R. R., Chem, R. H. and Hargis, T. 1992. Carbon sinks in mangroves and their implications to carbon budget to tropical coastal ecosystem. Water, Air. Soil Pol. 54, 265-288.
49. Urquiza-Haas, T., Doiman, P. M. and Peres, C. A. 2007. Regional scale variation in forest structure and biomass in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico; Effects of forest disturbance. For. Ecol Manag. 247, 80-90.
50. Valentini, R., Matteucci, G., Dolman, A. J., Schulze, E. D., Rebmann, C. and co-authors. 2000. Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature. 404, 861-865, DOI: 10.1038/35009084.
51. Van der Nat, F. J. W. A. and Middelburg, J. J. 2000. Methane emission from tidal freshwater marsh. Biogeochemistry. 49, 103-121.
52. Wesely, M. L. and Hicks, B. B. 1977. Some factors that affect the deposition rates of sulfur dioxide and similar gases on vegetation. JAPCA. 27, 1110-1116.
53. 2 stabilization, climate change and terrestrial carbon sink. Glob. Change. Biol. 6, 817-833.
54. 2 fertilization effect in forests -Estimates of the biotic growth factor based on 58 controlled-exposure studies. In: Biotic Feedbacks in the Global Climate System: Will Warming Feed the Warming? (eds. G. M. Woodwell and F. T. Mackenzie). Oxford University Press, USA, pp. 85-107.
55. Yong, Y., Baipeng, P., Guangcheng, C. and Yan, C. 2011. Processes of organic carbon in mangrove ecosystem. Acta. Ecol. Sin. 31, 169-173.